Saw so many people savaging this tweet yesterday that I thought, in the spirit of Christmas, that I would offer some reasons to encourage people to at least stop saying mean things about the person who posted it. 1/
She isn't evil, or crazy. She just suffers from the condition of being a hammer. To a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Some people are just incapable of seeing past their field of expertise and realizing that people have other considerations for how to live their lives 2/
Lawyers can have this same problem. The way they teach you to think in law school, when a client comes to you with a question, you can pretty much always think of a reason why what they want to do might expose them to liability. 3/
So a hammer lawyer just advises their clients against doing anything because of this parade of horribles that might conceivably happen. A good lawyer realizes that the company has to do things to exist and focuses on existential and reasonable dangers. 4/
Which is not to say that the same lawyer shouldn't mention the other possibilities, but should also point out that they are fairly small and unlikely. In any event, you get my point. 5/
This pandemic has exacerbated the problem for hammer epidemiologists. They always started with the erroneous perception that avoiding every conceivable disease is the only priority anyone should have. 6/
Huge portions of the media have spent the last year and a half telling them they're right in that perception. So you can see how a piece of advice that sounds insane like this gets put on Twitter without any sense of shame. It's not her fault. 7/
You don't have to listen. Just let the hammer sit over there and hit things in peace, take into consideration what the hammer says, then balance it with other normal considerations and live your life. Merry Christmas! 8/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Fauci is a bureaucrat. Nothing more, nothing less. He isn't Jesus Christ. Any other bureaucrat who is in charge of millions/billions in grant $, we would encourage aggressive questioning over whether they made mistakes and/or are covering their own asses or their friends'. 1/
When it's Fauci, though, aggressive questioning of his funding decisions is treated like an attack on science and truth itself. Just absolutely ridiculous. I realize that for a lot of people Fauci was an important voice last year but let's not lose perspective. 2/
No other bureaucrat possibly in the history of this country would have the media actually taking his side on the question of whether he is lying about funding gain of function research at this point, especially given that email. It's amazing to watch. 3/
In a perfect world both Taylor and I could think and write whatever dumb thing we want and people could decide on their own who they want to read/subscribe to. In Taylor's, everyone who disagrees with her should be fired or kicked off platforms they need for their livelihood.
Top 4 states by population (CA, TX, FL, NY) offer an interesting contrast in how their governments have responded to the pandemic. From an outcomes perspective, there's not a lot to recommend the extra measures imposed on residents of CA and NY. 1/
By deaths per 100K residents: heritage.org/data-visualiza… 1. New York (222.9) 2. Texas (125.8) 3. Florida (123.3) 4. California (103) 2/
I understand the argument that NY deaths should be graded on a curve because more of their cases occurred earlier in the pandemic and before better treatment protocols were developed. 3/
The minimum wage for robots will always be 0 dollars an hour
Your job exists until either 1) your wages, inclusive of benefits, exceed the value you produce, or 2) the technology exists to produce and maintain a robot that could perform it for cheaper than your wages
Governmental efforts to avoid this reality inevitably end with people stuck in poverty producing goods in horribly inefficient ways and yet being terrified of any release from their condition (see, e.g., the farmers in India)
My Octopus Teacher is possibly the worst project ever recorded on video. Everyone involved in making it, funding it, and green lighting it should be fired into the sun.
Most especially this applies to the human protagonist, who somehow expects to be praised for abandoning his entire life, including kids, because he saw a fucking octopus.
The entire conceit of the film is also a transparent lie: it was obviously made with a large film crew and (sadly) was not the project of one weirdo loser. I’m angry that my love of nature documentaries suckered me into watching it.
Boy, am I seeing a lot of overheated and misguided commentary about the Liz Cheney vote. Here's what the vote does and does not mean. 1/
The vote was not at all a referendum on Trump or Trumpism within the House GOP. Trump already won those votes overwhelmingly when only 10 House members voted to impeach him. 2/
It was won before that when virtually all House Republicans, including Cheney, endorsed and voted for Trump in 2020. The overwhelming majority of the House caucus voted both a) not to impeach Trump and b) not to remove Cheney from leadership for disagreeing, 3/