Nick Mark MD Profile picture
Dec 25, 2021 19 tweets 10 min read Read on X
Nothing conveys so much scientific ignorance so concisely as “Dandelion 22.7pH”
It’s a common misconception that you can’t have a pH above 14.

You actually CAN have a strong base with pH >14 (or an acid with a pH <0). It’s just super duper hard to dissolve that much base in water.

🧪 Let’s look at what it would take to make a BASIC solution with pH=22!
1/
First off what do we mean when we say BASIC?

I guess it could be any of these things…
2/ ImageImageImageImage
In a chemistry sense, a base is a substance that reacts with an acid.

Water (H₂O) exists as an equilibrium between H+ and -OH:
H₂O ⇌ H⁺ + ⁻OH

In water, a BASE increases the concentration of hydroxide [⁻OH] & decreases the [H⁺]

Now we need a way to measure that!
3/ Image
pH is often taught as a “scale from 0 to 14.” For 99% of uses this simplification works just fine.

But what pH actually measures is the activity of H+ ions, which we approximate with the decimal logarithm of H+ concentration.

pH = log₁₀[H+]

At pH =7, [H+] is 10⁻⁷ mol/L
4/ ImageImage
Notice that at a pH of 7, the concentration of ⁻OH is also 10⁻⁷ mol/L.

Because at pH =7, the [H⁺] = [⁻OH], the pH is the same as the pOH. This is why pH=7 is “neutral”; its neither acidic nor basic because there’s the same amount of acid [H⁺] & base [⁻OH] present
3/ Image
Quick sidebar: people have said that pH “isn’t metric”.

I can see why it’s confusing - a “scale from 0 to 14, where 7 is neutral” seems arbitrary (like water freezing at 32°F & boiling at 212°F).

But the unit we use to calculate pH is mol, which is about as SI as it gets!
4/ Image
Another sidebar: at my college, there was a 14 floor science library. As a tribute to pH, each floor was colored according to litmus paper for that pH.

Ugly brutalist architecture but a cool little design touch eh?
5/ ImageImageImageImage
Back to making crazy basic solutions:
If we want to raise the pH of of water (make it more basic), we need to add a base.

A strong base typically releases ⁻OH & can pull protons (H⁺) off of water. This decreases the amount of [H⁺] & raises the pH.
6/ Image
If we add 100g of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to water, this will raise the pH a lot! But how much?
(Definitely don’t try this at 🏠)

NaOH molar mass is 40 g/mol
So 100g of NaOH /(40 g/mol) = 2.5 mol NaOH

So if we dissolve 100gm in 1 L of water we = 2.5 M solution.
7/ ImageImageImage
NaOH is a strong base so it dissociates completely, therefore [OH-] = 2.5 M

Now we can plug that in & calculate the pH

pH = 14 - pOH

-log(2.5M OH) = -0.40

So pH = 14 - (-0.40)
pH = 14.40

👀 We just made a solution with pH >14.
8/
We did it. We made a solution with a pH of 14.4.

If we use that 14 floor science library analogy we’d be floating about half a floor above the roof!

It’s also super caustic & dangerous. ⚠️🧪
Seriously don’t try this.

So we got >14. But how high can we make the pH go?
9/ Image
Can we get the pH higher by adding more NaOH? Hell Yes!

The solubility of NaOH in water is 1000 gm/L.

So instead of dissolving 100gm and making a 2.5M solution we can dissolve 1000gm and make at 25M solution. 😱

-Log₁₀(25) = -1.4
pH = 14 - (-1.4)
pH = 15.4

A pH of 15!
10/ ImageImageImage
We got to a pH of 15.4!

Using our highly precise science library analogy we are now hovering well above the roof.

But we are still well short of the dandelions putative pH=22.

11/ Image
While we are making 25M NaOH, we are gonna run into a couple problems:

First even if it’s *theoretically* possible it’s gonna take *forever* to dissolve this much NaOH in water. Get used to watching this turn

Oh and it’s probably gonna melt the PTFE stir bar.

12/
The second issue is solvation.

Whenever a solute dissolves it becomes surrounded by solvent.

For simplicity we assume that there are far more water molecules than solute. This assumption doesn’t really hold with 25M NaOH.

(The molarity of water itself is 55M)
13/ Image
Bottom line it’s gonna be really really difficult to get the pH much higher than 15 in water.

So should we accept defeat and let the dandelion win? Never!

We are going to need a better solvent
14/ Image
But what solvent should we use? How does pH even work in solvents other than water?

Turns out it’s *complicated* but a unified pH scale was described in 2010 that we can use to help us find the right one!

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.100…
15/ ImageImage
This paper is brilliant btw. Using that original definition of an acid (proton activity) it provides a framework for comparing pH across different solvents.

So now we just need to find the perfect solvent to make a super basic solution to defeat the dandelion!
16/ ImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Mark MD

Nick Mark MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nickmmark

Jul 16
The media silence on this is deafening.

Did he have a head CT? What did it show?
Did he have stitches? Tetanus shot?

The NYT ran nonstop stories about Biden’s health after the debate but can’t be bothered to report on the health of someone who was literally shot in the head?
To the people in the replies who say it’s impossible because of “HIPPA”
1. I assume you mean HIPAA
2. A normal presidential candidate would allow his doctors to release the info. This is exactly what happened when Reagan survived an assassination attempt.
washingtonpost.com/obituaries/202…
My advice to journalists is to lookup tangential gunshot wounds (TGSW).

Ask questions like:
- what imaging has he had?
- what cognitive assessments?
- has he seen a neurosurgeon or neurologist?
- he’s previously had symptoms like slurred speech, abnormal gait - are these worse?
Read 4 tweets
Jun 30
You've probably heard "don't give lactated ringers because it raises lactate"

This statement is ~98% false, but there's one crucial practice-changing fact that you need to know.

A 🧵 all about lactic acid and lactated ringers!
1/
Image
Image
First off, we should ackowledge the obvious: Lactated ringers does in fact contain lactate... 28 mEq/L in fact

BUT there's one little detail to remember:
Lactate ≠ Lactic acid

When we measure "lactate" we care about the ACID (H+) which lowers pH & causes organ dysfunction
2/ Image
But the correlation between pH & lactate is really bad!

Look at this analysis of lactate vs pH in 171 ICU patients.

There is a *weak* correlation in people with arterial lactate > 5, but even w/ lactate =10, pH ranged from 7.5 to 7.05. Quite a spread!

3/ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Image
Read 10 tweets
Jun 13
If you intubate you need to read the #PREOXI trial!
-n=1301 people requiring intubation in ED/ ICU were randomized to preoxygenation with oxygen mask vs non-invasive ventilation (NIV)
-NIV HALVED the risk of hypoxemia: 9 vs 18%
-NIV reduced mortality: 0.2% vs 1.1%

#CCR24
🧵
1/

Image
Image
Image
Hypoxemia (SpO2 <85%) occurs in 10-20% of ED & ICU intubations.

1-2% of intubations performed in ED/ICU result in cardiac arrest!

This is an exceptionally dangerous procedure and preoxygenation is essential to keep patients safe.

But what’s the *BEST* way to preoxygenate?
2/
Most people use a non-rebreather oxygen mask, but because of its loose fit it often delivers much less than 100% FiO2.

NIV (“BiPAP”) delivers a higher FiO2 because of its tight fit. It also delivers PEEP & achieves a higher mean airway pressure which is theoretically helpful!
3/
Image
Image
Read 15 tweets
Jun 12
Results from #PROTECTION presented #CCR24 & published @NEJM.
- DB RCT of amino acid infusion vs placebo in n=3511 people undergoing cardiac surgery w/ bypass.
- Reduced incidence of AKI (26.9% vs 31.7% NNT=20) & need for RRT (1.4% vs 1.9% NNT=200)

Potential game changer!

🧵
1/
Image
Image
I work in a busy CVICU & I often see AKI following cardiac surgery.

Despite risk stratification & hemodynamic optimization, AKI remains one of the most common complications after cardiac surgery with bypass.

Even a modest reduction in AKI/CRRT would be great for my patients.
2/ From Nature reviews nephrology  https://www.nature.com/articles/nrneph.2017.119
During cardiac surgery w/ bypass, renal blood flow (RBF) is reduced dramatically. This causes injury, especially in susceptible individuals.

But what if we could use physiology to protect the kidneys?

Renal blood vessels dilate after a high protein meal increasing RBF & GFR!
3/ https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S0022-5223(18)33243-4/fulltext
Read 11 tweets
May 3
A slightly tricky blood gas case:

77 yo with respiratory distress, RR 30, SpO2 80% on non-rebreather at 15 lpm

CXR & TTE are unrevealing

pH 7.58 / PaCO2 24 / PaO2 >500 / HCO3 22

MetHb 0% CarboxyHb 0%

The ABG looks like this: Image
The answer is sulfhemoglobinemia.

Sulfhemoglobinemia is a *permanently* modified hemoglobin associated with exposure to TMP/SMX, dapsone, phenazopyridine, & other amino & nitro compounds.

It has an altered oxy-hemoglobin dissociation curve.

2/

Image
Image
Image
Sulfhemoglobinemia is easily confused with methemoglobinemia. Both have very dark colored blood & present with cyanosis. Diagnosis typically requires a specialized lab.

Spoiler: you may have heard that SulfHb is green. It isn’t really. You’re thinking of Vulcans’ blood.

3/
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 28
This story is absolutely shocking.

Philip Morris International (PMI) spent millions to influence medical education by buying a series of “CMEs” at Medscape!

How else has big tobacco tried to normalize vaping & influence the medical community?

🧵
1/
theexamination.org/articles/medsc…
Recently it was revealed that Philip Morris International (PMI) had SPONSORED CME materials about smokeless tobacco products on Medscape.

I had the opportunity to review these “CME” materials & they are pretty shocking!
2/

Image
Image
Image
One truly incredible thing about this “CME” was that it has NO DISCLOSURE SLIDE!

The fact that people teaching about vaping don’t disclose their financial ties to the tobacco industry is absolutely bonkers!

Why isn’t there a sunshine act for this?
3/
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(