We found @Reuters' favorite trick. After the "once-prosperous country" come the "once-booming oil capital" and the "once-flourishing western oil state of Zulia." We'd call Reuters a once-respectable media outlet but who are we kidding really?
So the story is how a migration flux of some 5,000 Venezuelan migrants a month across the Mexico-US border is "emptying" the major city of Maracaibo (1.7 million people) and the oil-producing state of Zulia (almost 5 million people).
You really can't make this s*** up!
Surely Reuters must have done some major research to back up this absurd claim. You better sit down for this: journalist Mariela Nava talked to eight families! Oh and then there's an anti-government NGO saying there are "neighborhood areas with few people left." Case closed!
Later on there's more fun w/ numbers. Some other useful source says there's a net 1400 people a week crossing into Colombia. Even assuming they're all from Maracaibo it would take 11 years to "empty" half the city. Never mind journalism standards, Reuters needs a calculator
Unmissable of course is a dishonest depiction of sanctions. "Critics say" mismanagement is also to blame, and the oil industry collapse is just due "in part" to murderous US sanctions. Yes,being hit by a truck aggravated the patient's life, he was already suffering from migraines
To set the record straight, there has been indeed a huge migration in recent years as the crisis takes its toll. UN estimates are 5-6M, though many Venezuelan sources argue figures are lower. It is a serious issue. But to claim a major Venezuelan city is being "emptied" is a joke
Also completely dishonest is to claim there's an issue w/ Venezuelan migration into the US. 50,000 people a year is next to nothing, both in terms of US-Mexico border traffic and Vzlan migration in general. But that racist, anti-immigrant dog whistle is not going to blow itself
And for an honest look at the slew of unilateral sanctions levied against the Venezuelan oil industry, as well as their impact, check out the following infographic: venezuelanalysis.com/images/15301
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Neocolonial plundered. Following the January 3 strikes and kidnapping of President Maduro, the Trump administration has moved in to impose control over Venezuelan resources, w/ Western conglomerates moving in under favorable conditions. Follow our thread/infographic
In recent weeks, the Venezuelan govt + National Assembly have fast-tracked reforms to attract foreign investment.Pro-business overhauls to hydrocarbon and mining laws slashed fiscal responsibilities, expanded concessions and removed the leading state role established under Chávez
Private corporations can now take over operations and sales, even if they are minority partners in joint ventures. The reforms, which followed years of devastating US economic sanctions, also established the possibility of taking disputes to international arbitration
Venezuelan Acting President Delcy Rodríguez gave a televised address earlier with some significant announcements on upcoming reforms. We'll have a report soon, and follow-up content once those reforms are in motion, but here's the gist of it (thread)
The most important announcement was an upcoming reform to the country's Labor Law. Approved in 2012, this is an absolute pillar of Chávez's legacy. But the private sector has upped complaints that present labor rights are too onerous and more flexibility is in order
As an aside, the Venezuelan gov't in recent years, under sanctions, has prioritized non-wage bonuses and kept wages frozen and devalued to almost nothing. In her speech, Rodríguez criticized past wage increases that were "irresponsible" and caused inflation. She announced an increase for May Day but it's likely to be bonuses, not salaries
The Venezuelan National Assembly approved a reform to the country’s Hydrocarbon Law in its first discussion. A second discussion and final vote are expected soon. This is arguably the country’s most important piece of legislation, so let’s look at what’s at stake 🧵🧵🧵
Some background: Venezuela’s present energy legislation was established under the Hugo Chávez govts. It was first approved in 2001 and later had some amendments. In essence, it reaffirmed the state’s sovereignty over natural resources and established control over the oil industry
Chávez’s reforms mandate that state oil company PDVSA hold majority stakes (in some cases at least 60%) and run oilfield operations. Taxes on oil profits were set 50%, royalties were raised (in some cases from 1%) to 30% across the board
The bar is always high (or low, rather), but every now and then the New York Times delivers an all-time masterpiece of journalistic dishonesty and pliant service to US imperialism. This is a piece about (imaginary ties) between Hezbollah and Venezuela: 🧵 archive.is/FPrMQ
First off, the US kidnapped/abducted Maduro. But US exceptionalism runs so deep that corporate stenographers believe Washington can just "seize" foreign leaders. But the relevant part here is that all we have here are claims by Rubio and US officials
This section is just empty fluff meant to malign Iran and Venezuela. Notice the nonsense of saying the countries are "bound by anti-American ideology" like it's some kind of bad taste in music, as opposed to the result of decades of imperialist attacks
A controversial afternoon (on Twitter) after the orangeman-in-chief lashed out at Colombia after the Petro government refused to accept repatriation flights with shackled migrants in military airplanes. Trump threatened tariffs and sanctions, Petro replied defiantly
Trump's disgusting (even by his standards) xenophobic and imperialist antics barely a week into his term have drawn fierce rebukes across the hemisphere. Honduran President Xiomara Castro called for an extraordinary summit in a few days
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro also voice his support, telling his Colombian counterpart he can count on the "strength and experience" of the Venezuelan people and calling for further regional unity
🧵When it comes to reporting about Venezuela, there is no corporate outlet even remotely close to the level of dishonesty of the New York Times. Seriously, it's one piece of misrepresented bullsh*t after another. Follow this thread as we break it down
This is the piece:
The article is not to be taken seriously b/c it starts from a blatant lie. US "prodding" has nothing to do with Venezuela holding elections. It is dictated by the Constitution that they be held this year and they were never in doubt shorturl.at/LFusR
Anyone not high on Western exceptionalism would actually be ashamed of their government meddling in other countries' affairs. But alas, this is the NYT.
In corporate media spiel, "restoring democracy" just means a US puppet being back in the presidential palace