2022 arrives soon. I’d like to give you a prediction about what you will know about COVID by next Christmas. 1st you’re looking for a comparison & keep hearing about flu. By next Christmas you will realize that the correct comparison is “tuberculosis before antibiotics existed.”
Omicron is going to change our whole theory of adaptation and force fatalism. Pandemic fatigue will force some of it, but basically the more informed you are the more fatalistic you will likely be by next Christmas.
Several factors are going to push this. Primarily it’s going to become that the best masks attenuate but are unable to provide enduring protection under many scenarios. Vaccine boosters will help but the circulation will be so constant that breakthroughs will just be given.
Tuberculosis will become the proper comparison. We will have to create specialist COVID care facilities. These will be like sanatoriums of old. We won’t start building them next year or even the year after but this is now inevitable specialized care.
By next Christmas you are going to start to realize that omicron sets back our medical progress incredibly. You are used to thinking of yourself and people you love as reasonably healthy. But more and more journalists are going to write a new story….
The story is going to be about someone with a formerly treatable cancer who died of COVID or about someone who has bi-pass surgery who died of COVID. The implications are going to become clearer and clearer that treatable conditions that lower resistance are now riskier.
By next Christmas you are also going to realize that everyone you know is getting older. And suddenly there are going to be sharper lines about mortality. It will be your 50th birthday or the 50th birthday of someone you love. And the fact of what omicron means will hit you.
The epidemiology is going to reflect this globally in decreasing lifespan. Where before we could all easily imagine living to our 80s and thinking of ourselves as robbed of something when we die slowly at a younger age, death in our 60s is going to seem more normal.
Death in our 70s will be considered very normal.
As this all takes shape, several effects are going to start to show up. One is that cities are going to again start to seem like unhealthy places.
Another is that careers in hospital medicine are going to become less attractive. Specialized services and clinics will help, but infection will simply uncontrollable often in hospitals.
Work from home is going to be highly desirable.
And lastly if you are a certain age, none of this will seem normal. But to your kids, this will be the way everything always was. That’s adaptation.
The insulting conclusion of the authors of the 2023 systematic review on long term effects of head impact exposure concludes that "some studies" suggest an increased risk from ALS and Dementia. Let's be clear: all of the people in those studies have names.
Its well-known in the history of neurology that denials of peoples' lived experiences, minimizing their suffering, and marginalizing their caregivers begins by unreasonably denying them a name for their condition. Here is how the NYTs put matters in 1983.
Read that carefully: "A problem can be much easier to live with once it has been clearly defined and its cause and consequences understood." These authors rapidly screened "7,512" articles and arrived at the magic number of "28" that fit inclusion criteria.
Oh dear. Even attentive readers of the Consensus will likely miss how this little gem is justified in footnotes 60-61.
The authors cite:
I appreciate that the titles are hard to read here, so I made you an image. What you are looking at are two studies that relied on the Rochester Epidemiology Project.
Concussion and its afterlives, 1928-Present. A history for those of you trying to get caught up on the day's events. [Thread].
(1) Concussions have long been recognized as dangerous injuries. They have also long been clinical events with legal meaning. Consider that the first history of the topic was published in 1953.
(2) Concussions have long been understood to have strong associations/causal link with chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). By 2023 McKee, A.C., Stein, T.D., Huber, B.R. et al. in Acta Neuropathol 145, 371–394 (2023) reported 645 pathology cases in the literature.
I thought I would help all of my fellow teachers with a one stop shop list of teaching tricks I’ve used to help me prep. Generally, keep it simple and easy to mark and remember it’s about learning not grades.
(1) concept maps. always fun. students like them. Give students a concept. Ask them to connect ideas together and find related ideas. Variations: do it collectively on a chalk board; do it start of term, middle and end. Ask students to compare them across time. Talk about it.
(2) Write one sentence explaining what X was all about: usually a who what when where why sentence. This technique can be folded into PowerPoint deck. Each section, example, case study etc can be followed by a slide asking them to do this. Have them compare with neighbors. Revise
22 April 2017 Paul McCrory submitted an Expert Report in "the Matter of the NHL" for the defense. He stated under oath that I did not understand the history of CTE. He was the lead author of the Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport from 2001 until today.
The Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport from 2001 until now has been relied on by individuals across the world to provide a standard of care for athletes exposed to concussive injuries. It has resolutely denied a relationship between hits to the head and CTE.
Today Professor McCrory has resigned following extensive claims of plagiarism about editorials he published in the "British Journal of Sports Medicine." theathletic.com/news/concussio…