The former Warsaw Pact countries are doing great, making steady progress toward catching up with West Europe.
The Baltics took a huge hit from the fall of the USSR and another huge hit from the 2008 financial crisis, but they have bounced back both times and are on a very positive growth trajectory.
(Plus, the Baltics have pretty high levels of income already)
The Central Asian post-Soviet countries have a mixed performance. Kazakhstan looks pretty good. Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, not so much.
But the Caucasus countries and the East European post-Soviet states are doing quite badly.
Why are Georgia, Ukraine, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Moldova doing so badly?
In a word: War.
These countries all have separatist regions and/or wars with neighbors.
Essentially, the post-communist countries that have managed to join the EU and reorient their economies toward the West have flourished, while those who have been unable to do so, and have been mired in intractable conflicts with other post-Soviet states, have languished.
So that divergence pretty clearly illustrates what's at stake for Ukraine in its current conflict with Russia.
But anyway, the latest statistics should give us great optimism about the transition away from communism. As long as countries can avoid conflict, the natural forces of economic catch-up work like they ought to.
Vintage Lego battle: Space Police vs. ragtag anarchist protester fleet
Who will win??
"ACAB!!!" the anarchists shout over the subspace network as they bravely dive their homemade fighter craft at the massive police battlecruiser
The Space Police have bulked up their armaments, due to years of surplus military equipment getting dumped on the market after the war against the Star Wars Lego sets
The thing is, while I think activists, intellectuals, media figures and politicians would benefit from crafting patriotic narratives that fit the middle option in this poll, I myself am not sure which I would pick.
Eight years ago I was very sure that America was one of the best countries in the world. I couldn't say THE best, having been to countries that were in their own way just as good. But definitely one of the best.
Now, I am not sure anymore.
Our culture has become far less gentle, tolerant, and accepting - and, possibly as a result, less creative. Our institutions haven't collapsed as much as some believe, but many are cleaely dysfunctional in a way most other rich countries' institutions are not.
This thread illustrates what always, to me, seemed like the fundamental problem with the BBB bill. No one could ever really decide what it was *about*. I had my own ideas for what it should be about, but everyone else had their own ideas.
For a long time the bill's main selling point was "it's big". That seemingly allowed every progressive to sort of graft their dreams onto the idea of the bill, even though it only really had the potential to be transformative in a couple of areas.
I feel like BBB has become a symbolic stand-in for the fact that a lot of progressives want America to change in a lot of different ways, all at once.
And the bill was just never going to be able to do that.
These reports paint Xi Jinping as a mercurial, arrogant micromanager -- the kind of leader who is good at scaring everyone into saying he's a great leader, but who is bad at actually managing an organization.
Apparently Xi is personally responsible for China maintaining its "Zero Covid" policy in the face of new variants, even though everyone is advising him to scrap it. China's whole economy will probably suffer as a result.