Weird, because the anti-Jewish riots and massacres in the early 20th century and the insistence on preventing Jewish immigration, including during the holocaust, seems to say otherwise.

But maybe this is a new development. If so, a shame it came too late
Amer: We never had a problem with you returning here.

Constant Palestinian rhetoric: "Go back to Europe, colonizer!"
Amer: The problem wasn't your return

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Pap…
I'll be honest, the belated recognition that "opposing Jewish presence in Israel" is a losing argument is a good thing.

Again, shame it came this late.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Akiva Cohen

Akiva Cohen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AkivaMCohen

26 Dec
Hey, #LitigationDisasterTourists, let's talk about this defamation suit for a minute. Moss and Freeman were the GA election workers on Rudy's CCTV video with the "suitcases" that were "under the table". They're now suing OAN, its owners, and Rudy for defamation
This is a lawsuit that will need to clear the "actual malice" bar. They were election workers performing a government function (counting ballots); commentary on that type of thing needs freedom to be vigorous. So defamation liability can only exist if they can prove1 of 2 things:
1) OAN & Rudy actually knew that the things they were broadcasting about Freeman and Moss were false.

2) OAN & Rudy didn't know for certain they were false but subjectively had serious doubts about whether it was false.
Read 18 tweets
21 Dec
OK, let's talk about this Alex Berenson complaint. It's a chonky boy, clocking in at 228 paragraphs and 70 pages, and I'm actually in quite a bit of pain at the moment (did something to my back) so this will definitely break across a few days. But we'll do our best
So this is a pretty straight up suit, Berenson v. Twitter. California requiring numbered pleading paper (those numbers down the side) is an abomination, but it's always nice to see the causes of action laid out up front. What are they? Image
Like all good litigators, Berenson's team leads with his strongest argument, which is ... that a private company violated the First Amendment
Read 320 tweets
15 Dec
OK, litigation disaster tourists, time to look at John Eastman's lawsuit to stop Verizon from turning his communications metadata over to the January 6 Committee

Full complaint here storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
We'll roll through his arguments, but here's the tl;dr:

This complaint is the legal equivalent of flop sweat - dude is *terrified*, and I look forward to the country finding out exactly why.
Eastman is suing both the January 6 Committee (which issued the subpoena) for a declaration that the subpoena is invalid, and Verizon (to whom the subpoena was issued) for an injunction to stop it from complying
Read 106 tweets
14 Dec
Here's what @ZahraBilloo said in the speech @CAIRNational is defending:

"let's fight the root causes, and that's what this conversation is about. The connection between islamophobia and zionism"
"this is not a hidden connection. All of you in this room and hopefully everyone within six degrees of separation from you knows that islamophobia is a well-funded conspiracy- a well-funded project, a well-funded project to marginalize us to imprison us to deport us to silence us
"they're afraid of our advocacy. They know that muslims fight for black lives matter ... and most importantly they know what my parents taught us that muslims fight for palestine that muslims will fight for a free palestine and so they must come after us"
Read 8 tweets
9 Dec
From litigation disaster tourism to cutting edge copyright (and constitutional) issues. cc @questauthority.

Also (and I'm hesitant to say this given how good the @DWTLaw attorneys Cher has are) I think she's left her best legal argument sitting on the table
Which is this: The copyright termination provisions apply only to rights grants "executed by the author." Here, she has a Marital Settlement agreement that was (per her complaint) so-ordered by the California state court
AFAICT, she should be arguing that a so-ordered stipulation identifying and providing for the distribution of community property as part of a divorce settlement is a grant *by the Court*, not "by the author", in exactly the same way a contested divorce judgment would be
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(