Jon Owen Profile picture
Dec 28, 2021 22 tweets 8 min read Read on X
I know the back story to this, so I'll do a short thread on it.

Nobody comes out of it looking good, except @KarenGee3, who's been giving @CumbriaCC constructive feedback on this scheme until, as my Dad would say, she's blue in the face. Not that it does much good.

(1\n)
(2/n)
Let's go through:

- Where these 'NO CYCLING' markings are;
- Why they've been put in;
- At whose request;
- Current national police guidance that covers cycling on the pavement;
..and, crucially, *why* people might be riding cycles along this stretch of footway/pavement.
These 'NO CYCLING' markings have recently been installed on Shap Road in Kendal. Shap Road has something of a cycle scheme running along it, much of which is shared space. It is certainly not a shining beacon of best practice in designing for active travel.
(3/n)
Note also that Shap Road is home to The Queen Katherine School (QKS), one of Kendal's two secondary schools. We'll come to why that's key shortly.
I cycled along to see for myself this afternoon.
I saw two paint markings, circled in green on this high tech diagram:
(4/n)
This photo is taken looking South, at the northerly of the two markings. QKS's cycle lockers and cycle racks are located here. I'll touch on desire lines and whatnot shortly.
The folks who live here have complained to their county councillor about cyclists on the pavement.
(5/n)
Here's another street view, looking North, with the site of the southerly of the two new 'No Cycling' markings circled in green.

From the resident's POV, having people on cycles fly past their front gate along the narrow pavement is a nuisance and a hazard. I get that.
(6/n)
Let's zoom out, to consider routes to school. Although there's no such thing as strict catchment areas for Kendal's two secondary schools, a fair proportion of QKS's 1,400 students live on Sandylands, one of Kendal's largest housing estates. I've marked it here in pink.
(7/n)
If you want to cycle to QKS from Sandylands, bearing in mind cycle access and storage is in that SW corner, here's the most likely desire line:
Cut through from Broad Ing to Fowl Ing Lane, turn R onto Appleby Rd, then L down Crescent Green, which is one way. But then what?
(8/n)
Heading to QKS by bike from Appleby Rd, as many students do, we find ourselves at the end of Crescent Green, with the school gate just along to our right (North) but, inconveniently, Shap Road cycle lane (blue) on the far side of the busy Shap Rd. With no way to access it.
(9/n)
So you can see why, cycling to school, QKS students might well consider a short ride along the pavement their 'least worst' option for the final stretch to reach the school gate.

Getting home is no better, but we'll get to that.

First, is cycling on the pavement illegal?
(10/n)
In 2014 police chiefs were issued with guidance from the then junior transport minister, which asked for discretion to be exercised in terms of pavement cycling, acknowledging that many cyclists, especially children, are afraid to cycle on the road.
news.npcc.police.uk/releases/suppo…
(11/n)
So cycling on the pavement, whilst illegal and potentially subject to fixed penalty notices, is understood to be something that many people on cycles, especially children and young people, feel forced to do because of their fear of traffic.
Now let's look at the ride home.
(12/n)
Imagine you are a student at The Queen Katherine School (QKS) in Kendal, you live South East of the school, perhaps on the large Sandylands estate (circled pink, below). You've cycled into school. What's your desire line to get home?
(13/n)
I suggest your desire line is something like this:
From the cycle racks at the SW corner of the playing fields, head South along Shap Rd as far as Mint St.
Turn L into Mint St which, like Crescent Green, is one way.
Turn R onto Appleby Rd, then L onto Fowl Ing Lane.
(14/n)
As soon as you leave the school gate nearest the cycle racks, there are three options for heading South:
1. Ride with the traffic on the busy Shap Rd;
2. Cross the road to join the shared path;
3. Nip along the pavement, over the No Cycling marking.

Let's look at option 2
(15/n)
Having dismissed the idea of riding with the traffic, let's examine the detail of trying to cycle South from QKS to get home from school.
Initially, all is good: a button-controlled crossing allows us to reach the shared path on the far side of Shap Road.
(16/n)
So far, so good: we're on a shared path off the road as we pass the laundry.
Opposite the laundry is Crescent Green, which we popped out of this morning, to get to school. It's one way though, so we need to head for the next street South, Mint Street.
(17/n)
Having passed the laundry, we reach the side road junction of Mintsfeet. There's a button controlled crossing here, for both folks on foot and cycle.

On the far side, though, is where the trouble kicks in: how is a person on a cycle supposed to get to Mint Street?
(18/n)
There's no safe means of crossing Shap Road to reach Mint Street, which we've established is the preferred route home from school for large numbers of Queen Katherine School students. Shap Road is perennially busy.
So is there a designated crossing a bit further on..?
(19/n)
The next crossing you come across that allows you to safely cross Shap Road is here (circled). Not only is that some 450m from where we actually want to cross, it will also necessitate backtracking to get home. It's a poor option, in amongst no good options.
(20/n)
Before I wrap up, a bit of local politics.
After some resident complaints, these 'No Cycling' markings have been put in at the request of the county councillor. The same Lib Dem cllr was bitterly opposed to the whole Shap Rd cycle scheme. I guess there's votes in NIMBYism.
(21/n)
22 of 22.
Faced with no good options in terms of a safe and reasonably direct route to and from school, children are forced to choose a 'least worst' route: one which sees them cycling along a short stretch of pavement.

It's up to us to offer them better, safer options.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jon Owen

Jon Owen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @anotherJon

Mar 6, 2022
Thread:

"I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that"

- Bad Science guy Ben Goldacre adopted this as his catchphrase a while ago as part of his push to get folk to engage with scientific topics on the basis of evidence, no matter how tricky that may become.
(1/n)
Seeking out, making sense of and basing positions, policies and actions on evidence is hard. It's hard because it takes critical thinking, it's hard because evidence is often complex and ambiguous and - crucially - evidence frequently confounds our preconceptions.
(2/n)
So, given how hard it is to base positions, policies and actions on evidence, it's unsurprising that we are inclined to take an easier path, one in which we simply run with our preconceptions and fallacies, and don't open them up to challenge: we call this common sense.
(3/n)
Read 21 tweets
Dec 1, 2021
These news stories based on DfT statistical releases hope to have us saying "Oh, that's terrible" and, of course, every death on the roads is a preventable tragedy.

But they always have the nerd in me questioning whether the stats are being used with integrity.

A thread.
1/n
2/n
At the end of June, a bunch of journalists picked up on a stat within a DfT data release that there had been a 40% increase in cycling fatalities in 2020 compared to 2019.

A 40% increase in cyclists dying on the UK's roads?
Perfect fodder for "Oh, that's terrible" stories.
3/n
More people dying on the UK's roads is, of course, tragic, regardless of their mode of transport.

But the thing is, we'd not long before been told that the amount of cycling being done had also hugely increased.

And surely the best metric is the casualty rate by distance?
Read 17 tweets
Oct 31, 2021
"Why don't cyclists use the cycle lanes?" has become a common refrain.

There are many reasons why. This is just one of them.
📷 @NiallMcFarland
"Why don't cyclists use the cycle lanes?" has become a common refrain.

There are many reasons why they might not. This is just one of them.
📷 @eatsruns
"Why don't cyclists use the cycle lanes?" has become a common refrain.

There are many reasons why they might choose not to. This is just one of them.
Read 10 tweets
Oct 30, 2021
A poll for the Daily Mail finds:

🌍 Only 9% think climate change isn't happening

🌍 62% think it's not too late to tackle it

🌍 74% think a 2050 net zero target is either too late (44%) or about right (30%)

🌍 60% think the govt is doing too little

Yes, in the Daily Mail.
..Just as @LeoHickman says, this poll should be taken with a massive pinch of salt, but they're interesting nonetheless, and the results are quite similar to surveys whose methodology is much less questionable.

For example, the British Social Attitude survey 35 from 2018:
In 2018 the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) found 93% of UK adults think climate change (CC) is definitely or probably happening, so that remaining 7% aligns reasonably well with the Mail's 9%.

Thing is, NatCen found only 2% claiming CC is definitely not happening:
Read 4 tweets
Jan 20, 2018
Thread.
1/ Irate driver: "Cyclists should get out of my way. They don't pay road tax."
2/ I'm going to argue that whilst I understand the roots of this anger, it's baseless and in fact, if anyone's freeloading it's motorists.
3/ This line of thought has been promoted by @CyclingMikey joining a 'to-and-fro' with an angry driver and offering this infographic:
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(