Context thread:
• The defense bill is DOUBLE the COMBINED costs of COVID stimulus + infrastructure + Build Back Better. (Where are the deficit hawks like @Sen_JoeManchin?)
• And it's unnecessary: U.S. defense $ exceed Russia + China + the next 9 countries COMBINED. ... 1/
@Sen_JoeManchin Some will argue, as @BroadbrainTV does here, that it's ok because "the defense bill is a jobs bill." And that's sort of true: the defense industry accounts for at least 800,000 jobs and 10% of U.S. manufacturing. is.gd/Brn8g0 ...
2/...
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV But as a job creator, defense sucks. About 14MM people work in manufacturing; at 10% of total manufacturing, defense should employ about 1.4MM, but actually employs about half that, because defense toys' materials, research, etc. are expensive compared to labor cost. ...
3/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV So: national defense is important, but the U.S. would be perfectly secure with a fraction of what we spend. Again: we spend more than Russia, China, and the next 9 countries (most of them our allies!) COMBINED. 4/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV And yes, jobs are important, except "clean energy and health care spending create 50 percent more jobs than the equivalent amount of spending on the military. Education spending creates more than twice as many jobs." is.gd/1ZhBoI; is.gd/JDjAde 5/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV So if we don't need it militarily, and could create more jobs by spending the same $ on domestic programs, WHY do we spend so much on defense?
Congress. The invisible third leg of the "military-industrial complex" that hippie peacenik Dwight Eisenhower warned us about. 6/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV I mean, it's not JUST Congress, but Congress is the key, because defense contractors have carefully ensured that every single Congresscritter has a stake in defense spending. There's no district that doesn't have defense jobs: ...
7/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV "The defense industry has carefully crafted business to maximize congressional interest. The new Ford-class aircraft carrier is built of parts that are made in 330 of 435 congressional districts and forty-five states." is.gd/kvvuVF 8/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV (Quote above is from some hippie peacenik source... (checks notes)... the U.S. Military Academy at West Point website.) 9/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV And this crap doesn't just hurt the U.S. people economically. It affects foreign policy, and makes us LESS safe!
E.g.: one 9f the largest recipients of U.S. military aid is Israel – a wealthy country that already has the strongest military in its region (incl. 60 nukes). ...
10/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV Israel doesn't need U.S. aid. Israel's use of American-paid-for, American-made weapons (incl. in its illegal occupation of Palestinian land and repression of Palestinian protesters) are a HUGE reason many in the Islamic world fear and hate us. It's one reason 9/11 happened.
11/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV So if our military aid to Israel isn't needed by Israel, doesn't strengthen the U.S. militarily (we have no bases there), and poisons many people's perceptions of the U.S., why do we give it?
Because that aid comes with a catch: Israel must spend our $ on U.S.-MADE weapons.
12/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV So U.S. military aid to Israel (and to many other countries) is really a slush fund: under the guise of "foreign aid," we're actually just giving U.S. taxpayer $ to the U.S. defense industry. 13/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV To sum up:
• Showing "fiscal discipline" by voting against BBB or other domestic programs while ignoring the bloated defense budget is, as Garrison Keillor once put it, like trying to lose weight by giving up anchovies. (Hi, @Sen_JoeManchin, you disingenuous putz!) 16/
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV • Congresscritters worried about constituents' defense jobs should pay more attention to the reality that defense spending is COSTING their constituents jobs, because MORE people could be well-employed by spending those $ on butter, not guns. ...
17/
• We voters and activists need to pressure our representatives to acknowledge Ike's truth: that both national security AND employment would not only be preserved, but BETTER served, by radically reducing the "defense" budget and investing the $ in people instead.
18/18
@Sen_JoeManchin@BroadbrainTV P.S.: Also, and always, f*ck @Sen_JoeManchin and his faux concern for fiscal discipline. You can't be a serious deficit hawk AND vote for the bloated defense budget, you schmuck.
P.P.S.: Great comment from @BroadbrainTV. The decoupling is the key.
You: "I don't want to support Elmo's Twitter, but this still is where the cool kids are, and I value this community."
Me: "Yes, community matters! But your community is relocating. Here are some of the great writers, thinkers, and kind souls currently active on Mastodon: 1/
This feels like a good time to remind everyone that six days from now my bride and I will climb on @HawaiianAir #25 to celebrate our 30th anniversary by learning to sail on a 33' sailboat cruising Molokai, Lanai, + Maui + earning our @__ASA__ 101, 103, 104 certifications. 1/
I share this so that my fellow Olds can remember who they are: ageless magical beings who are still 5 and 21 and 35 and 50. We've experienced most of the ages, and so we are all of them.
2/
@HawaiianAir@__ASA__ And I share this so you Youngs can learn that youth is delightful but not conclusive. That age should not be denigrated (and ffs stop picking on Pelosi, the greatest SOTH since LBJ; maybe better).
3/
From a trial lawyer's perspective, this short hearing on Alex Jones' emergency motion to suppress the contents of his cell phone is amazeballs. Short thread: 1/
First, trial judges generally bend WAY over backwards to protect lawyers from possible legal malpractice actions, and put privilege-waiver genies back in the bottle when possible. Why? Bec they want the case to be about *the case*, not setups for a later malpractice action.
2/
For a judge to *not* at least grant temporary protection while a lawyer gets his sh*t together is remarkable.
But Jones abused discovery so badly all along that this judge has already defaulted him as a penalty -- the nuclear remedy for discovery abuse, almost never seen.
3/
We all know the Second Amendment: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
What many don't know is the Constitution's *other* militia clauses that give the 2A context: 1/
Yes, "militia" is discussed OUTSIDE the 2A. Constitution Article 1 Section 8 gives Congress power over national defense, including the army, navy – and militia. If we want to understand what the 2A means by "well-regulated militia," that's where we have to start.
2/
First, note that the Framers didn't trust standing armies; they knew Caesar had led his troops across the Rubicon to crush the Republic, + foresaw that a too-strong standing army could topple their nascent democracy in a military coup (as we've seen countless times elsewhere). 3/
I hope everyone understands this, but in case they don't:
The Senate gives votes to land, not people. Wyoming has 2 senators per 290,000 people; California has 2 senators per 20 million people. It's the ultimate "gerrymander." 1/
The antidemocratic Senate —> an antidemocratic Electoral College —> undemocratic Presidential elections.
President + Senate choose SCOTUS justices.
Therefore, in our supposedly "democratic" republic, the Executive, Supreme Court, and half the Legislature are undemocratic.
2/
Making it worse, the Constitution allows itself to be amended in any way EXCEPT changing how the Senate is elected.
The Framers didn't trust us to change the two seats per state Senate formula.