Acclaimed Journalist Profile picture
Dec 29, 2021 11 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Ambitious people are always looking for the next avenue to further themselves. In the case of the wealthy this becomes exponentially harder with increasing success. This is both a function of the rarity of unicorns (think Google, Facebook etc.) & the metrics at that level. 🧵
If you’re worth $10 then making a deal which will increase your wealth to $100k is a massive increase and success, but when you’re worth $100 million or $10 billion it’s not even worth looking at the things which won’t make a percentage change to your net wealth.
Besides for the obvious attraction of power, this is why the wealthy elite are involved in every global issue - there’s money to be made. Take climate change for example. The renewable energy industry is worth $900 billion, but by 2030 it’s estimated to be valued at $2 trillion.
A segue at this point to remind you that 1 million seconds is 11.5 days, a billion seconds is 31.5 years, and a trillion seconds 31 688 years or 31 and a half millennia.

Anyone who has more than $100 million is wealthier than most of us can reasonably conceive at a glance.
If you’re one of these super wealthy folks then you’re looking for exactly this type of investment - massive growth potential with billions of dollars up for grabs. Do any of these people care about ‘climate change’? Maybe, but probably not; cf. Obama’s oceanfront estate.
What they do care about is making sure this is an industry that grows rapidly. That won’t happen by them supporting combustion engined cars (even though they usually buy and own many themselves) or by speaking reasonably about reliable energy generation sources such as nuclear.
Instead they hop on the bandwagon suggesting it will soon be too late to save the planet unless everyone drives an electric vehicle, embraces wind turbines (ouch), and downgrades their lifestyles to ‘save the environment’. All the while investing and benefiting from the changes.
This is why the hypocrisy is so blatant and obvious. None of the elites are going to stop eating meat or flying on private jets because they care about a modeled rise in temperatures by 1 degree, but they expect you to so that they can become even richer.
Many such examples can be found throughout the past few decades, from supporting war under the guise of patriotism whilst investing in arms companies to backing technology they won’t let their own children have access to but from which they profit handsomely.
Historically the solution to this kind of behavior has been violence. The most famous example is the French Revolution. In general the elites consider themselves invincible, and the average man in the street doesn’t see the manipulation until it’s too gross to ignore.
Perhaps this time we can avoid getting to that end. That will however only happen if journalists stop colluding with the elites by misinforming the public. People are being unknowingly led to misery so that the wealthy can become wealthier. It’s a recipe for disaster.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Acclaimed Journalist

Acclaimed Journalist Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jonathan_Witt

Jan 16
This is the way. 🧵

Part of the reason that younger people globally are so entitled is because they’ve been told that people who have nice things are “privileged” and that this has been given to them not earned.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Image
If you were a kid who grew up before the 90s then you understood privilege as something to aspire to.

‘That guy drives a really nice car, what a privilege’

‘This lady has such a beautiful home, she’s really privileged’

Privilege was known to be something you earned.
Equally it was understood that to achieve a position of privilege you had to work pretty hard to get there.

Those who didn’t earn their position of privilege were largely mocked e.g. trust fund kids who didn’t work hard but spent money like water.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 13
In many ways the South African Jewish community is responsible for the situation in which they find themselves.

For years community leaders have courted ANC politicians in the naive belief that the crocodile would eat them last.

There has been little to no investment 🧵
in building relationships with those where there is actually common ground - Afrikaners, the Zulu nation, Christians (especially the ZCC) etc.

Furthermore Jewish business moguls have refused to back allies in the media space. I speak from personal experience having approached
many CEOs and business leaders, several of whom were Jewish, to help fund the @Renegade_Report.

They all refused and instead continue to this day to support the very same media outlets and journalists who openly hate them.

To be clear Jews are not responsible for antisemitism
Read 5 tweets
Aug 4, 2023
I’ve had plenty of good faith engagement with my assertion that the outrage and amplification of Kiddie Amin merely plays into his hands and serves as a very effective marketing campaign for his interests.

I think it’s valuable to discuss what the reaction should look like. 🧵
Let’s deal with the most common objection;

“You can’t ignore this kind of behaviour cf. National Socialist Germany”

Yeah I agree. It’s not about ignoring but rather about moderating response and controlling narrative.
As things stand that idiot says one thing and the very people he’s painting as the enemy react exactly as an enemy would. Because he’s targeting a minority this sets up precisely the dynamic he’s attempting to create.

The result of this is quite the opposite of the ideal.
Read 15 tweets
Mar 9, 2023
Human attention span together with the nature of time means that the contemporary relevance of any event has a finite limitation.

There are many recent examples of this.

2 years later video evidence shows the Jan 6 riots at the Capitol were not what we were told they were. 🧵
It doesn’t matter though because enough people were fooled on the day, and in the weeks which followed. The goal of making people believe that this was a seminal event has been achieved and regardless of any evidence to the contrary now, a significant portion of the US and the
global population will always believe the lie. Facts be damned.

The pandemic also presents us with numerous examples of this phenomenon. When a virus started infecting people across the world it was obvious that it’s origin was very likely a laboratory.

Those in power did
Read 8 tweets
Feb 28, 2023
There is a very weird view amongst some pandemic skeptics (the group of people right about almost everything covid related) that believing a virus escaped a lab following gain of function testing makes you a fool. There are so many inconsistencies in this thinking. 🧵
Firstly if you don’t believe the overwhelming evidence of a lab leak which those in power across politics, science, and the media have tried to hide for 3 years then you assumptively believe those same people including Fauci who said this was a natural event.
This is an incredibly odd and easily refutable position to hold, however if you’re stuck on natural evolution theory then it makes no difference if others are saying that gain of function is dangerous. This is objectively true - we should not be dangerously enhancing viruses.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 24, 2023
Francis Harris, @fharris2011, chose to pick a fight this evening because I noted that those in power seem to want anything but peace as an outcome to the war in Ukraine.

Why would a former deputy editor at The @Telegraph behave like this?

So I went digging. 🧵
Mr Harris is now the “Managing Editor” at CEPA.

What is CEPA you ask?

Well it’s the Centre for European Policy Analysis of course.

Sounds innocuous enough, right?

Yeah I thought so too, and then I went to have a look at their funders.
Oh will you look at that;

Lockheed Martin

and the US State Department amongst others.

Yeah it boggles the mind why a person who works for an organisation like this would be against peace.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(