Ambitious people are always looking for the next avenue to further themselves. In the case of the wealthy this becomes exponentially harder with increasing success. This is both a function of the rarity of unicorns (think Google, Facebook etc.) & the metrics at that level. 🧵
If you’re worth $10 then making a deal which will increase your wealth to $100k is a massive increase and success, but when you’re worth $100 million or $10 billion it’s not even worth looking at the things which won’t make a percentage change to your net wealth.
Besides for the obvious attraction of power, this is why the wealthy elite are involved in every global issue - there’s money to be made. Take climate change for example. The renewable energy industry is worth $900 billion, but by 2030 it’s estimated to be valued at $2 trillion.
A segue at this point to remind you that 1 million seconds is 11.5 days, a billion seconds is 31.5 years, and a trillion seconds 31 688 years or 31 and a half millennia.
Anyone who has more than $100 million is wealthier than most of us can reasonably conceive at a glance.
If you’re one of these super wealthy folks then you’re looking for exactly this type of investment - massive growth potential with billions of dollars up for grabs. Do any of these people care about ‘climate change’? Maybe, but probably not; cf. Obama’s oceanfront estate.
What they do care about is making sure this is an industry that grows rapidly. That won’t happen by them supporting combustion engined cars (even though they usually buy and own many themselves) or by speaking reasonably about reliable energy generation sources such as nuclear.
Instead they hop on the bandwagon suggesting it will soon be too late to save the planet unless everyone drives an electric vehicle, embraces wind turbines (ouch), and downgrades their lifestyles to ‘save the environment’. All the while investing and benefiting from the changes.
This is why the hypocrisy is so blatant and obvious. None of the elites are going to stop eating meat or flying on private jets because they care about a modeled rise in temperatures by 1 degree, but they expect you to so that they can become even richer.
Many such examples can be found throughout the past few decades, from supporting war under the guise of patriotism whilst investing in arms companies to backing technology they won’t let their own children have access to but from which they profit handsomely.
Historically the solution to this kind of behavior has been violence. The most famous example is the French Revolution. In general the elites consider themselves invincible, and the average man in the street doesn’t see the manipulation until it’s too gross to ignore.
Perhaps this time we can avoid getting to that end. That will however only happen if journalists stop colluding with the elites by misinforming the public. People are being unknowingly led to misery so that the wealthy can become wealthier. It’s a recipe for disaster.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Rogan starts by asking JD what it’s like running for VP of the USA. Vance says that this is the first time in months he’s been in a “public spot without Secret Service in the room”.
Vance goes on to relate the story of how Trump asked him to be his running mate. Says he missed Trump’s first call and when he called back Trump said “JD you just missed a very important phonecall I’m going to have to pick someone else now…just kidding”.
Vance: “Trump hears my son in the background…and he says put him on the phone…and he reads the statement announcing that I’m the VP nominee…and he’s like what do you think about that Ewan…and my son Ewan is like oh that’s pretty good and he gives the phone back to me”
Joe starts by talking to Trump about his appearance on The View in 2015 where is he introduced as “our friend” and hugged by Whoopi Goldberg, and then mentions how Trump suddenly became an enemy when he started winning.
Trump responds by talking about the shift between his pre and post political life. Essentially goes into his popularity as host of The Apprentice (prompted by Rogan) and how he was loved by many on the Left including those at places like The View - “they loved me”.
Joe says that “the thing turned on you” when they found out you were going to be President and many are starting to realise that - cites Ackman and Musk. Asks what it was like being elevated to President.
What I would do as Minister of Health, a thread. 🧵
Usual disclaimer, I’m just a journalist and not a doctor so this is just my totally uninformed opinion.
I also expect Aaron Motsoaledi, the godfather of the doomed NHI to do exactly none of this.
Here goes:
1. Scrap NHI. Centralizing power over healthcare funding and management is a very bad idea. Instead the Ministry should actively seek out public private partnerships where the Department funds projects and the private sector brings their competencies to fulfill such contracts.
One example is that the management of clinics and hospitals should be put out to tender. Private management groups should be tasked with managing public sector health to a high quality and efficiency with clear KPIs. Government as the contractee would have an oversight role.
Part of the reason that younger people globally are so entitled is because they’ve been told that people who have nice things are “privileged” and that this has been given to them not earned.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
If you were a kid who grew up before the 90s then you understood privilege as something to aspire to.
‘That guy drives a really nice car, what a privilege’
‘This lady has such a beautiful home, she’s really privileged’
Privilege was known to be something you earned.
Equally it was understood that to achieve a position of privilege you had to work pretty hard to get there.
Those who didn’t earn their position of privilege were largely mocked e.g. trust fund kids who didn’t work hard but spent money like water.
I’ve had plenty of good faith engagement with my assertion that the outrage and amplification of Kiddie Amin merely plays into his hands and serves as a very effective marketing campaign for his interests.
I think it’s valuable to discuss what the reaction should look like. 🧵
Let’s deal with the most common objection;
“You can’t ignore this kind of behaviour cf. National Socialist Germany”
Yeah I agree. It’s not about ignoring but rather about moderating response and controlling narrative.
As things stand that idiot says one thing and the very people he’s painting as the enemy react exactly as an enemy would. Because he’s targeting a minority this sets up precisely the dynamic he’s attempting to create.
The result of this is quite the opposite of the ideal.