Thread by @AJKayWriter

Anyone who thinks this is new info hasn't been paying attention.

And that's ok.

But all those people who called this out 18mo. ago?

They *were* paying attention.

Maybe we should start listening to them now since - you know - they've been paying attention all this time.

https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1476189028982702080

And their reward for paying attention - mind you - was endless scorn, derision, and moral accusations.

So maybe a little more consideration this time is in order.

And basic human decency aside, this matters because PCR is not fit for the purpose of determining infectiousness and infectiousness is the *only* reasonable justification for quarantining people (and even that is debatable).

Ergo we should not quarantine people based on PCR.

This is also why we should not count everyone who dies within X days of a positive PCR as a "Covid death".

Viral fragments detected at high cycle thresholds hold no information value.

There are a lot of problems with claiming PCR is the "gold standard" and if more people had been paying attention - or at least not attacked those who were - maybe we'd be in a better place.

So let's try something different and actually attempt to learn from our mistakes.

Wild idea, right?

I'm a dreamer, I know.

Here's a flashback to July 2020

https://twitter.com/kylamb8/status/1288542979641290758?s=20