Obviously, this book, which was also labeled a "Pick-A-Path Adventure," uses the same format as classic "Choose Your Own Adventure" books, that exploded in popularity with the first book in 1979.
What I didn't know is that the Endless Quest books were part of a TSR initiative to develop curriculum programs for reading and problem solving! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endless_Q…
If you don't know the format: the books present the reader with choices at key moments, directing you to different pages depending on your choice. Thus you "pick" a "path" through the book, with different endings possible, some good, some horrific.
I still have four of my original Endless Quest books, and I focus on Pillars of Pentegarn because it is the one burned into my brain: it is practically a horror story!
In the book, you "play" as Jaimie, a young boy who can inexplicably talk to animals and hangs out with them in the forest. When his animal friends spot goblins pursuing an adventuring party, he opts to go warn them. (Or not, in which case the story ends immediately!)
In the ruins called the Pillars of Pentegarn, Jaimie meets a wizard, a fighter, and an elven rogue, who have arrived to reclaim the lands for King Pentegarn -- the wizard -- from the evil Dark One.
This book stands out from other Endless Quest books due to it particularly eerie nature. You are playing a rather vulnerable young person, thrust into a catacombs filled with goblins and horrific undead, including the dracolich on the book's cover.
I feel comfortable saying that EVERYONE who has read the book has the scene burned into their minds when the rogue scouts ahead, finds some cursed treasure, and returns as an animated skeleton! This is a magnificently horrific scene.
I did a quick reread through Pillars just to remind myself of the story and see how I would fare, and I'm delighted to say that I got probably the best ending on the first try! (I would've been traumatized if I had skeletonized Lydia again.)
The book is early enough in D&D history that it doesn't have any particular setting. That's part of the charm for me: there's no huge Forgotten Realms lore and backstory to worry about, just a boy, his talking fox and owl friends, and an evil Dark One.
Reading it was a great nostalgia trip, and I will probably dig through the others I own eventually, too! /END
PS somehow I only now just learned that TSR also published a series of "HeartQuest" books, D&D stories with romance, aimed and young women! Now I need to read one...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So here's my hypothesis on the whole Musk twitter deal. 1/
Dude LOVES Twitter. As a narcissist, he can't get enough of the adulation of the right-wing mouth-breathers. But Twitter keeps banning the people he loves, so he becomes convinced that Twitter is a liberal SJW organization. 2/
He decides to teach them a lesson, and make an offer to buy the company. Absolutely convinced that it is a left-wing political site, he's sure they'll refuse his offer, even a ridiculously good offer. Then he can say "aha! they're so woke!" and his fans will cheer. 3/
Hey let's make Twitter like the old days! Speculate with an example of a #FakeTrumpAnnouncement!
"My Fellow Americans, I have recently received intelligence that has made me conclude that pee is not in fact stored in the balls." #FakeTrumpAnnouncement
"Fellow Patriots, I am here tonight to tell you that untreated syphilis is no joke. It can have catastrophic effects on your brain funshionalialialialialialialifunkytownshitfuckality." #FakeTrumpAnnouncement
Rahasia is one of two adventures that the Hickmans originally self-published, along with the other classic Pharaoh. It was originally published by their Daystar West Media in 1980, in a run of no more than 200 copies.
The Hickmans originally wrote and sold D&D adventures to fund their own interest in the hobby. However, they ran into financial difficulties and sold their first two adventures to TSR, who also hired Tracy Hickman as a writer.
Since I've already seen an incredible amount of this abuser logic coming from the pro-forced birth crowd, I wanted to take a moment to address it. I too started out as a person with a "moderate" view of abortion -- which it turns out is exactly what Roe allowed. 1/
But it quickly became clear that the pro-forced birth movement have no interest in making abortion less common. They have no interest in comprehensive sex education, easy access to contraceptives, or resources for family planning and support. 2/
In fact, they largely oppose these motions. Famously, when Sandra Fluke argued before Congress that women should have better access to birth control, she was labeled a "slut." Pro-forced birthers have no interest in any practical means of reducing abortion. 3/