David Fickling Profile picture
Dec 31, 2021 36 tweets 10 min read Read on X
Inspired by this tweet, here's a seasonal 🧵 about colonialism, trade, luxury goods, the Sun King, and the man who invented European cuisine:
Those highly-spiced, sweet-sour flavours we associate with "Christmas foods" in European cultures have always struck me as a weird anomaly.

Mostly, European cooking uses minimal spices and avoids mixing the sweet and the savoury.

That's a stark contrast to most other cuisines. ImageImageImage
I used to think this was just because spices from the tropics weren't much available in Europe, so only got used for special occasions, whereas in places like India they were ubiquitous and thus widely used.

In truth, I think the explanation is close to the opposite.
You can see this if you look back at medieval European cuisine, which was highly spiced, mixed the sweet and savory constantly, and in many ways resembles "Christmas cooking".

Take the banquet for the coronation of Richard III of England in 1483:

nerdalicious.com.au/history/the-co…
This was as highly-spiced as any Indian, Chinese or Jamaican meal. Pound upon pound of ginger, saffron, cloves, rice, sugar. Sweet dishes presented at the same time as the savoury courses, and sugar mixed into the savoury dishes. Image
What's more, there's the question of *where* all those spices in non-European cuisines came from. Look at the range of locations in that tweet quoted at the top of this thread. Even India and Indonesia didn't grow all these spices domestically. Image
How did Jamaican allspice and Mexican chiles make their way into Indian cooking? How did Indonesian nutmeg and cloves get to the same places? Through the spice trade of course. Image
But who, famously, controlled the spice trade in the early modern period?

European colonial powers — the same nations that, until my lifetime, largely excluded those same ingredients from their own cuisines.

They refused to get high on their own supply.

That's weird, right?
I think this is largely down to the influence of one man, François Pierre La Varenne, the most influential chef of the 17th century and I'd argue, history. Image
La Varenne was the chief cook to several prominent aristocrats in the mid-17th century, at the time when Louis XIV, the Sun King, was building up the status of France (and Paris as its capital) as a center of wealth and splendour that would set an example to the rest of Europe.
It's easy to forget now how *anomalous* France is among European nations, but that was very visible in this era.

It was the most populous nation in the world after Ming/Qing China and Mughal India, with an endowment of fertile land far beyond any other European power.
It was also singularly unsuccessful at Empire. Until the colonization of west and central Africa in the late 19th century France had never managed to match the colonial successes of smaller, poorer nations like Spain, Portugal, England and the Netherlands.
Louis XIV's powerful first minister Jean-Baptiste Colbert had an idea for how these qualities could be turned to his advantage: build up France as a centre for producing luxury goods like fabric, exporting to other nations to bring in foreign coin for the royal treasury. Image
Another thing that was happening in this era was that Paris was growing into the largest city in Europe, drawn by the wealth of Louis XIV's court.

With half a million people, only London could compare to it among western European cities. Image
This posed some profound logistical problems.

Cities of that size need a vast surrounding infrastructure to provide them with food, fuel and materials, but the Seine is not a very good trade artery.

It drops just 35 metres over the 450 kilometres between Paris and the sea.
Until the river was dredged and railways crossed the land in the 19th century, barges still often needed to be dragged over the shallow shoals downriver from Paris, and in Paris itself you could wade across parts of the river. Image
Quite a contrast to the Thames, which could float the largest oceangoing vessels of this era direct into the port of London on the daily high tides. Image
So what is the revolution La Varenne carried out in European cookery?

First, spices are minimized and banished to the dessert course. Spices had to be bought from the Dutch and the English, so represented a loss to the royal treasury under Colbert's mercantilist economics.
The same goes for sugar, controlled in this era by the Portuguese and Spanish colonies in the Americas.

(Saint-Domingue, the brutally wealthy French sugar colony that later became Haiti, was barely established in this era). Image
There's another reason for banishing spices and sugar in an aristocratic cuisine: They're *cheap*.

European dominance of ocean trade meant that the price of such delicacies was far below what it had been in the middle ages, when they were status-symbol bling.
What's expensive in a Paris straining at the carrying capacity and transport networks of the Seine basin?

Fresh, local produce, delicately cooked to bring out its flavour and show off its quality.
One of La Varenne's most famous creations is duxelles, that paste of mushrooms, herbs, shallots and butter that you find inside the crust of a Beef Wellington, named after his employer, the Marquis d'Uxelles. Image
To this day fresh mushrooms are hard to transport. In mid-17th century Paris they'd have been an impossible luxury.

La Varenne's was the first European recipe book to include a section on vegetables. I think this isn't because they were humble, but because they were fancy.
Getting vegetables in a good condition on a Parisian dining table in 1650 meant either that you had a fully-functioning kitchen garden amidst some of the costliest real estate in Europe, or you had access to the best transport money could buy.
Colbert's policy of building up France's luxury goods industry was a victim of its own success.

The 1685 anti-Protestant revocation of the edict of Nantes drove many of the country's most skilled artisans into exile, spreading French knowhow and fashion across Europe.
The food fashions of a few Parisian aristocrats from the mid-17th century thus set an enduring template for the whole of Europe.

La Varenne's main work, La Cuisinier François, remains in print for nearly 200 years and is pirated across Europe.
Original copies are still rare for a reason any cook will recognise: chefs simply used them to death, turning pages with sticky messy fingers until the book fell to bits.
The challenges of France's farm economy and Paris's feeble trade links didn't go away.

Take energy. London was powered from the middle ages with coal ("sea-coal") boated down from Northumbria. Some of the first air pollution laws date from 1285, banning coal-burning in London. Image
Amsterdam had peat dug out of its polders to provide energy for warmth and cooking, but Paris had neither.

All its energy was wood from the Morvan forest in the foothills of the Alps, barged down the Seine. Image
For most of the 18th century Paris had been trying to build canals to improve access for the wood barges, but it came too late for Louis XIV's successors. Image
Wood inflation in the bitter winter of 1788-9, along with the wider inflation that followed, was one reason that the people of Paris were ready for revolution by the summer of 1789. Image
Even now, France is the only EU country that's self-sufficient in food. And its heavily agricultural economy meant that industrialization was relatively light compared to its neighbours.
We think of France as the home of egalité, but until the 1960s and the European Common Agricultural Policy, its farm-dependent economy led to unusual, almost Latin American-style levels of inequality.
(ends)
Thanks for reading. I like to end the year with a big tweet thread on something non-work related.

If you liked this, here is one from last year about how a ship-eating clam helped spark the Industrial Revolution:

And one from the previous year about why we've never seen evidence of alien civilizations:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Fickling

David Fickling Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @davidfickling

May 11
A thing people really do not understand about US companies fretting about their per-car EV losses stories is that this is almost entirely a spurious issue about the unique way US accountants treat certain types of R&D spending. 🧵

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
When you hear a Ford executive saying “we are losing $100k per EV” your bullshit detector should be flashing red hot.

An F-150 Lightning EV costs about $55k to buy. It does not cost anything like $155k to make.

It’s 98 kWh battery will be, at $140/kWh, a bit under $14k.
And battery prices are considerably below that right now. Ford should be getting it for $12k or less. A Chinese company will be paying below $10k.
Read 25 tweets
Mar 26
I've long been a huge fan of @michaelxpettis and agree with him about most aspects of China's economy, but I think there's good evidence that clean tech, at least, is seeing solid, operationally-financed, productivity-enhancing growth right now. 🧵

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
A pretty common argument you hear these days to justify trade restrictions on Chinese EVs, solar panels, and batteries is that the industries are only prospering because of unfair subsidies. I don't think that's supported by the data:

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
The argument goes something like this: China is awash in easy money from state banks; its renewable manufacturers are undercutting overseas rivals; ergo, its comparative advantage isn’t scale, efficiencies or innovation, but the availability of cheap government cash.
Read 14 tweets
Aug 15, 2023
You may think you've heard recently that demand for crude oil is running at record levels — but we're still below a peak we hit five years ago.

A 🧵 to explain why:

#oott #climate
bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
Last September I made one of the scariest calls I've made as a columnist — a prediction that consumption of crude oil had already peaked, despite predictions that this was a decade or more in the future:

To have some accountability I went for a two-part wager:

1. that output of crude oil and condensates had already peaked;

2. that output of crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids had already peaked;

(we'll get to the terminology in a minute...)

Read 23 tweets
Jul 14, 2023
Let's talk polymetallic nodules!

A thread on something that's (depending on your taste) a looming environmental disaster, or a key to the energy transition.

(Spoiler: I think both arguments are wrong)

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
You may be inclined to ask, polymetallic whats?

Well, much of the ocean floor is strewn with these potato-sized pebbles, which appear to form through complex processes over millions of years and are rich in manganese and other useful base metals. Image
From time to time, people have thought about mining these nodules. The most famous case was an extraordinary Cold War caper in the 1970s, when Howard Hughes set up a fake nodule mining company as cover for a CIA operation to salvage a sunken Soviet nuclear submarine. Image
Read 29 tweets
Apr 4, 2023
OPEC+: "It's weird and troubling that the world isn't investing in more upstream oil production!"

Also OPEC+: *Doesn't invest in upstream oil*

Also also OPEC+: *Cuts output, adding to low-cost spare capacity that deters rivals from investing upstream*

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
I would like to suggest that the best explanation for this contradictory series of facts is that oil demand is in decline and every party is behaving rationally.

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
If you think oil demand is in fact rising then the entire global oil industry, with ~$3 trillion of annual revenues and ~$500 billion of annual capex, has taken a collective decision to just leave trillions of money on the table for ~reasons~
Read 6 tweets
Mar 30, 2023
Today I want to tell a story about the con artists of cryptoland, and how they have a lot more in common with the founding fathers of modern capitalism that one might initially think (thread):

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
At this point it's pretty clear that cryptoland is in deep trouble. Sam Bankman-Fried can now add allegations of bribing Chinese officials to the string of accusations stemming from the collapse of crypto exchange FTX: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
His nemesis Changpeng Zhao is now facing a lawsuit against his rival Binance exchange from the CFTC: bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(