Did it occur to you Wokists that there's almost no difference between your irrational obsession with Fauci, and the hard-core MAGA crowd's obsession with Trump? In essence? None. So y'all are gonna point fingers at each other when people talk about "Mass formation psychosis," 1/
but that doesn't mean it's not happening. Just because you can see it in others, doesn't mean you're not also guilty of participating, it's just the particulars that vary. So how do you know you're really on the outside watching collapse on slow motion? 2/
1. You consult sources from a variety of POV, independent as well as establishment.
2. You identify and question ALL premises, looking for data and objective facts to back up what you're being told.
3. In the absence of data you do your own background research as best you can 3/
4. You ask lots of equations, and are prepared to be wrong about things (and admit people have points when they do)
5. You don't attach virtue or vice to facts, or draw false equivalencies.
6. You provide definitions of words like "they" that are quantifiable and objective. 4/
In other words, names, titles, institutions, not tribes or groups of people organized around arbitrary criteria, immutable characteristics, or even parties unless they have an opportunity to disavow platforms with which they disagree.
7. You avoid terms "always" and "never" 5/
8. Most of all, you can observe your own behavior and thinkings processes, explain them without using anyone else as a foil at all, and are comfortable standing alone in those opinions, even if the majority of those around you snarls and demonizes you. /END
*questions, not equations

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Insomnochick is unafraid and unapologetic

Insomnochick is unafraid and unapologetic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @insomnochick

2 Jan
Dear fellow New Yorkers about to make the same decision I made decades ago: before you leave, get your philosophy straight, please? Otherwise wherever you go, there you'll be, pushing the same collectivist, Gladys-Kravitz busy-bodyism on people in other states. To get started 1/
Remember the following:
1. There can be no human rights without property rights, starting with your body (all of it, for everyone, not just female reproductive parts); 2/
2. There can be no "social" justice without individual liberty; if you think you can "liberate" anyone by subjugating others, you're wrong;
3. Socialism is communism you vote for (once), and it doesn't work. It enslaves people, and leads to mediocrity, misery, and early death;3/
Read 11 tweets
15 Dec 21
This notion that "balance" fixes indoctrination in K12 is silly. First, as a practical matter, school isn't the McNeil Lehrer Report. It's school. It's supposed to select some values to teach, and in public school, they were supposed to be as universal as possible. 1/
Second, there are only so many hours in a class day, and only so much space in the library. Third, creating confusion is the point of wokism; adding more messages helps their cause, it doesn't balance anything or return a child to equilibrium.2
Fourth, children who are pre-rational (and taught by irrational wokists) aren't able to tease out "truth" from competing ideas. They have to be taught and incentivized to do this. Load the library with Locke and Sowell, and their fiction counterparts, and it won't make a dent.3/
Read 8 tweets
14 Dec 21
The argument least likely to persuade me a policy is good or bad: "Well the poor won't be able to --- if that's the plan."

Define "won't be able to?" Will they be literally prohibited? Ok yes, that's bad, but 99.9% of the time this statement means "It will be harder."1/
Yeah, I know, that's why being poor sucks. It's also why charity exists, it's also why we get policies based on whether they literally infringe in liberty, not whether they make something more expensive. Look at why they're more expensive first. 2/
If they make things more expensive because govt is intervening in the market and costing you out, by all means rail against govt, intervention, but be consistent. Don't demand interventions for some things, then balk when the same powerful make rules YOU don't like 3/
Read 10 tweets
14 Dec 21
Fact: very few movies and plays have been made over time with black protagonists telling stories unique to black Americans.
Fallacy: this means it's racist to complain about black actors portraying white historical figures. 1/
I've long wondered what would happen if the people arguing "Race of actors shouldn't matter," even if the real life person, or original fictional character was from a specific ethnic storytelling tradition (see: Snow White, Cinderella, etc) would do if we flipped that script. 2/
"The role of Frederick Douglass will be played by Kevin Costner," or "The Life Story of Richard Pryor, starring Rowan Atkinson."
Why would this be a problem? Shouldn't it matter more if they are good actors? 3/
Read 5 tweets
9 Dec 21
So sick of the "gotcha" game! This is when people demand that I name the exact school, classroom, teacher and lesson plan in my state (or any state) that proves to their satisfaction CRT is being used in K12.

A thread...1/
These are the same people who insist we must teach kids "how to be anti-racist," that "systemic racism" exists and is "everywhere," upholding "whiteness" as the "dominant culture," and "oppressing black and brown people." They insist they know these things to be true because 2/
"disparities in outcomes" by race exist and persist; they insist all efforts to correct these disparities over time have failed because the "systems" are designed to keep them in place, to uphold "white power structures" and to "benefit white people." 3/
Read 7 tweets
3 Dec 21
Dear parents: unless and until you understand who really decides what gets taught in your child's classrooms, you won't be able to understand why reforming the current system is impossible. It starts with recognizing that most "teachers" aren't what or who you think they are. 1/
They were neither selected for their "expertise" at anything, nor are they "well-meaning" by your standards. You make assumptions about the people in control of your children all day at their, and your own, peril.2/
Sucks to be a good teacher reading this, but my guess is good teachers reading this would agree, and be more than happy to go along with what I'm about to propose: parents should assume malicious intentions, and insist upon proof to the contrary, NOT the other way around.3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(