Thread by @thecuriousbelle

Since you can't show a final SC criminal conviction of ANY of the Marcoses that cements your #MarcosMagnanakaw outcry, can you show a "findings of fact", in ANY court decisions in PH & abroad, that PROVES the Marcos wealth came from "Kaban ng Bayan"? Now, you have no excuses.

Too narrow daw ang final & executory SC conviction. Eh di gawin nating broad. Anything that you can find, in ANY court decisions, in PH and abroad, that proves the wealth came from Kaban ng Bayan, you can show.

You can no longer make this excuse: 1. "HOW CAN YOU SUE SOMEONE WHO IS DEAD?" Hindi talaga kayo nagbabasa. My challenge says: "ANY OF THE MARCOSES". There's Imelda, BBM, Imee, Irene. So, don't make this excuse ha.

You can't make this excuse: 3. IMPOSSIBLE ANG DECISION NA HINAHANAP. -- Dahil wala kayo after 35 years, kaya impossible? Dahil hindi fit sa narrative ninyo, kaya impossible? Kaya "Findings of Fact" na lang hinihingi ko in ANY court decisions in PH and abroad. Go, hanap na!

You can't make this excuse: 4. WALANG PLUNDER LAW NOONG TIME NA IYON -- "Findings of Fact" na nga lang in ANY decisions - civil or criminal, Sandiganbayan or SC, Pilipinas or abroad, na NAGPAPATUNAY (hindi presumptions) na nanggaling sa "Kaban ng Bayan" ang yaman, OK?

Don't make this excuse: 5. THE CRONIES CONFESSED NA MAY NINAKAW -- So, may confessions at witnesses pala kayo. Bakit hindi ginamit ng PCGG sa mga kaso? Or, I'm pretty sure ginamit. Pero hindi pa rin napatunayan na ninakaw sa Kaban ng Bayan? Bakit, anong mali sa confessions?

Don't make this excuse: 6. SINABI NI LEE KUAN YEW NA MAY NINAKAW. Saan tayo maniniwala, sa court decision ba or sa opinion ng isang tao?

You can't make this excuse: 2. YOU CAN'T SUE SOMEONE WHO IS NOT IN PH - Then, show a court decision abroad. Ang daming na-file sa U.S.

You can't make this excuse: 7. SINABI NI SERENO SA FACEBOOK NA NINAKAW SA KABAN - If she TRULY believes na ninakaw sa Kaban ng Bayan, bakit hindi nya sinulat sa 2012 & 2017 SC decisions ng civil forfeiture cases na sya ang pontente ng mga decisions na ito?

So, saan tayo maniniwala: sa mga sinulat na SC decisions ni Sereno sa civil forfeiture cases na walang nakalagay na sa Kaban ng Bayan nanggaling ang yaman, or sa storytelling nya sa Facebook? And when you ask her, she will block you.

Saan tayo maniniwala: sa legitimate na PEER-REVIEWED, CROSS-EXAMINED, and VERIFIED na COURT DECISIONS by no other than the Supreme Court JUSTICES, or sa mga kwento nya sa Facebook? I am asking this question so you can also think about it.

Bakit tinawag na "ILL-GOTTEN WEALTH" kung hindi ninakaw iyan sa kaban? Since Feb. 28, 1986 (3 days after EDSA 1), when Cory Aquino signed EO 1, iyan na ang term na ginamit to refer to the wealth of the Marcoses WITHOUT PROOF na ninakaw. Check the WHEREAS CLAUSES of that EO 1.

BAKIT HINDI MA-EXPLAIN NG MARCOSES KUNG SAAN NANGGALING ANG YAMAN? Kaya nga na-forfeit ang ibang assets in favor of the Republic, because that is what RA 1379 says. Pero, nasaan ang criminal liability dito na nagpapatunay na ninakaw iyan sa Kaban ng Bayan? Assuming kayo?

The interpretation of the facts INSIDE A COURT trumps all the interpretations and assumptions of historians, politicians, mainstream media, citizens, and legal students OUTSIDE OF COURT. Please remember this.