Here’s a useful @JosephPolitano piece attacking my argument on inflation and concentration. (Ht @GeorgeSelgin) apricitas.substack.com/p/are-rising-c…
I think my response to @JosephPolitano is that his analysis is divorced from the underlying reality of commerce. Like most macro-economists, he assumes that individual markets are generally competitive, and that concentration is not the norm.
Take this argument on how meatpacking monopolists don't really matter because meat is a small portion of the CPI. This only makes sense if you assume that meatpacking is an outlier. But is it? No.
75% of U.S. industries have gotten more concentrated over the last 25 years, with higher profit margins, larger firm size, and fewer new entrants. This is probably a *secular* shift in our markets. It's not just meat. econpapers.repec.org/article/ouprev…
This lack of curiosity about the economy shows in his solutions. He argues, for instance, that the Department of Commerce should not increase tariffs on Canadian lumber. They aren't tariffs, they are duties, and they are set by anti-dumping law. They aren't discretionary.
He also does a rhetorical dance, where he implies solutions that attack individual markets by taking on corporate power won't work to reduce inflation, but then suggests a number of his own solutions that facilitate corporate power in individual markets will work.
He argues for repealing the Jones Act, which would let foreign ships traffic from U.S. port to U.S. port. This might help Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Alaska a bit, but almost no one else. The jam-up at the Port of LA/Long Beach has zero to do with domestic maritime trade.
A far better solution on the table is the Ocean Shipping Reform Act to re-regulate shipping. But of course that, plus other eminently reasonable choices like re-regulating railroads, is not noticed by macro-economists.
He also argues that Biden keeping the Port of LA/Long Beach open 24/7 should be seen as a success for Biden. Once again, that's just not reality. As @mercoglianos has pointed out, the ports aren't really open 24/7.
The point here isn't that @JosephPolitano is wrong about the cause of inflation. It's just that there's a massive gap between the macro guys' analytical framework and the reality of the economy they discuss with such confidence.
I am not an economist. And because of that, in February of 2020, I predicted shortages in the economy as a result of the coming pandemic, because I knew that the just-in-time system economists adored was dangerously thin. wired.com/story/covid-19…
Macro-economists have work to do in terms of building out models that make sense. They missed the Covid shortage problem, the financial crisis, and the China shock. The models they use to measure the macro-economy - because they avoid talking power - just don't reflect reality.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt Stoller

Matt Stoller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @matthewstoller

3 Jan
This is good. It shows the Biden administration has recognized that the forty year experiment of consolidation in every industry is a failure.
If concentration is systemic, then taking on monopolists is an inflation-fighting strategy. 60% of inflation increases are going to corporate profits. mattstoller.substack.com/p/corporate-pr…
Meat is an obvious case. Back in October I pointed out that the economists blocking action on meatpacking consolidation had manipulated data to protect monopolists. Higher beef prices are one result. mattstoller.substack.com/p/economists-t… Image
Read 24 tweets
2 Jan
Rather amusing to see a debate over price controls as if we have a functional government who could implement them in time to do anything about inflation. Adorable!
People who cite John Kenneth Galbraith as controlling inflation often neglect to point out that there was a large competent bureaucracy and public support to implement them. What are we gonna do today? Hire McKinsey?
The anti-monopoly movement spent years studying how to organize the bureaucracies and it’s still really hard to turn the ship around. The idea you can snap your fingers and return to a WWII model of economic organization should be embarrassing to its proponents.
Read 4 tweets
1 Jan
I’ve lost huge amounts of respect for academic historians over the last fifteen years, with superficial and cringe essays like this. Elite historians are increasingly just MSNBC pundits with phd’s. politico.com/news/magazine/…
I remember under Obama how ‘top’ historians just loved him, and ignored his policy choices. Under Trump they mostly followed the same obnoxious groupthink.
Like all progressive institutions, the university system is in crisis. And academics should expect political attacks because they are upholding an increasingly illegitimate order.
Read 5 tweets
31 Dec 21
I love writing my newsletter, but I always get nervous before hitting send. This year BIG hit 50,000 subscribers, and that's a lot of people if I get something wrong.

The top five pieces for BIG this year were...
(1) Amazon Prime Is an Economy-Distorting Lie mattstoller.substack.com/p/amazon-prime…
(2) The War in Afghanistan Is What Happens When McKinsey Types Run Everything mattstoller.substack.com/p/the-war-in-a…
Read 8 tweets
29 Dec 21
Inspired by Larry Summers and his tirade against antitrust, I looked into inflation and market power. It turns out 60% of the rise in inflation is going to corporate profits. mattstoller.substack.com/p/corporate-pr…
This is the corporate profit increase from 2019 to 2021, from $1T to $1.7T, or $2,126 per American. Yes, you pay more than two thousand dollars a year more for everything than you did before the pandemic, purely because corporate profits have gone up that much.
"For every American man, woman and child in the U.S., corporate America used to make about $3,081 in 2019, and today corporate America makes about $5,207 in 2021. That’s an increase of $2,126 per person." mattstoller.substack.com/p/corporate-pr…
Read 6 tweets
21 Dec 21
There's an enterprising career waiting for a business historian willing to debunk Hovenkamp's problematic historical work. He's just wrong that 19th century anti-monopoly policy was merely about gov't privilege. Ultra vires suits were the keystone.
Hovenkamp is a deeply influential pro-monopoly advocate, a sort of Diet Bork who spread a more annoying and difficult to administer version of Chicago School philosophy throughout the courts.
Here's our piece on Hovenkamp's disastrous philosophy and legacy.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(