GDPR isn't even that brutal in terms of data regulations. It makes you wonder what American companies are collecting that makes it so hard for them to be compliant.
GDPR basically says data that is personally identifiable (can be used to say who you are in real life) belongs to you.
Companies must have your consent or legal justification to use or transfer your personal data. You can withdraw that consent at any time.
GDPR also includes some guidelines for how companies can implement these regulations.
Here's the thing: GDPR is fairly easy to implement for a company that actually cares about data privacy. You want to work with those companies anyway.
From a data perspective, personally identifiable information isn't even that necessary for most purposes. We don't need to know who you are to do 99% of the things we really need to do.
Many companies addicted to doing things they don't need to do with your private data though.
Full disclosure: In real life I'm a Big Data guy. I build data systems across the entire board, including data privacy and security. I breath this stuff, and I love it. I know what we can do with data and that's why I support these (late and soft) steps to make it user centric.
I'll also add that while GDPR is cool, companies really invested in working around it can do so and correlate your data to figure out who you are without violating the rules. It takes a lot of infrastructure to do it though, Google and Facebook.
Bad actors will remain bad actors
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A diagram like this helps to explain why race isn't biologically real.
Let's do a thread
So humans are 99.9% the same genetically. In this diagram, the SNPs (think of them as places where people differ) that are known are grouped by the locations of people who carry them.
What we can see is that almost all of humanity's genetic diversity is found within Africa 2/
Those in Europe and those in Asia contain almost a subset of the genetic diversity found in Africa.
This is the same sort of pattern you'd see if Africa was again split into Nigeria and not-Nigeria.
So those outside Africa are like smaller groups within Africa. 3/
What's often labeled culture is simply rational behaviors given a people's environment.
One of the reasons I often criticize the "culture" explanation for disparate racial outcomes is that it's built on the assumption that some "races" behave more irrationally compared to others within the same environment.
An assumption of cognitive inferiority in terms of decision making and behaviors in my mind can't be separated from the view that there is something inherently wrong with those "races" relative to others.
Some people instinctively oppose calling out racism because they see being against racism as being woke, and they've decided anything woke is bad.
It's a weird kind of ideological partisanship where people will turn off their critical thinking rather than be seen as endorsing any kind of "wokeness".
A plea to the so-called anti-woke is not to paint yourself into such a corner that your "tribe" is racism, if only the subtle kind.
If you agree with the goal, then use your voice to call out racism.