Hussein Aboubakr Mansour Profile picture
Jan 5, 2022 11 tweets 2 min read Read on X
The point I’m trying to make is that the assumption that Islamists are somehow disingenuously manipulating progressivism is wrong. Perhaps this is the case for the older generation of Islamist male leaders but not for the new one. The new antisemitism in America is a potent /1
eclectic mixture of deadly toxins from both East and West. This is what's responsible for the upsurge in the popularity of terrorists such as Leila Khalid and Ghassan Kanfani, icons from the era of international Marxist Palestinian terror, and not say, Sayyed Qutb or Sheikh /2
Ahmed Yassin. Anyone familiar with the history of antisemitism knows of its remarkable ability of transmutations. In last November’s Zahara Billoo’s speech, one can hardly find references from the traditional Islamist repertoire. Instead, her speech with filled progressive /3
platitudes about Black Lives Matter, police accountability, homelessness, poverty, the environment, and Palestine. To assume that both Billoo and her Muslim audience were engaged in some elaborate theatrics of pretending to be progressive while secretly planning to take the /4
world back to 7th century Arabia requires the same level of imaginative delusional thinking required by the belief in a global Jewish conspiracy. I take them for their words. The new antisemitism is hip, young, cool, and educated. It is diverse, multicultural, articulate, /5
well-traveled, progressive, and upwardly mobile. It is queer, poetic, with a lisp, and good on social media. The new antisemitism is not about Christ-killers, racial pathogens, immoral capitalists, or conspiring internationalists, it is about the enemies of equality, human /6
rights, and progress. The irony of course, and the heartbreak, is that American Jews quintessentially defined progressivism. And just like what happened with religion once before, what was once a Jewish endeavor is quickly becoming THE anti-Jewish endeavor.
There is a case for here for authoritarian affinity and for a totalitarian impulse that is underlying the ideological structure. Thinking that progressivism is a fixed ideology of good words and good deeds and that those antisemites don't represent "real progressivism,"
or don't represent "real" feminism, is any less naive, or really narcissistic, than saying this is not "real" Islam or that was not "real" communism. Those who seek power seek power whether it was in the name of the proletariat, the umma, the future generations,
liberation, or "our communities of color." The impulse to total power so one may totally transform a totally bad reality to a totally good reality can be be done for the sake of the workers, Allah, minorities, women, etc.
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hussein Aboubakr Mansour

Hussein Aboubakr Mansour Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HusseinAboubak

Jun 1
I recently realized that Darryl Cooper is not only the most popular writer on Substack but also a widely influential figure online. Curious about his appeal, I decided to listen to him, and accidentally I fell right into his account of Jewish history and Christianity (I don't know if that's all he does). Despite approaching it with good faith, particularly when he opened with the phrase “as a Christian,” I found the experience painful and couldn't go on past 20 mins or so. Within 20 minutes, he arrived at the astonishing claim that “the central conflict in all the Gospels” was about the Jews finally accepting the Gentiles. This is simply false. I have no idea where Cooper derives his theology from, but it bears little resemblance to any serious reading of the texts. The Gospels are not structured around this all. Their central conflict concerns the identity of Jesus himself—his claim to messiahship and divine sonship—and that is what culminated in his crucifixion. If this is his approach to all topics, then the man is creating a whole alternative reality that is parasitic on this one. That's not at all different than what leftist scholars have been doing for decades.
It was only 20 mins but the whole thing was bizarre. His understanding of Christian theology is that god basically designed for himself a pedagogical journey so he might experience those little dramas of those little humans. So God basically is Faust, in it for the experience!! It's so stupid you feel its some stupid Hollywood kitsch.
What I find heartbreaking is that the man had the heart to call himself a Christian as he was quite blatantly sacrificing the very heart of Christian theology (who is Jesus?), unequivocally throwing it out, in order to replace it with what is clearly obsessive antisemitism.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 1
This is happening in most museums I visited in the UK, Spain, and Germany. The informational plaques are often just exercises in narcissistic resentment talking about the white gaze, constructing whiteness, orientalizing, and all the cacophomisms that are clearly American in origin.
This was from the Thyssen museum in Madrid. Just read the bolded words Image
Currently, the Kurpfälzisches museum in Heidelberg has a special exhibition on Orientalism and the construction of whiteness. As a historical corrective, they staged portraits of a bunch of black people in European 16th-century attire to de-orientalize them. If I were black, I would have been very insulted.Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 20, 2024
There is a beautiful conflict that has been playing out between bourgeois Arabs whose path to white liberal status goes through the trauma of Western colonialism and others whose path to the same status goes through guilt over Islamic imperialism and terrorism.
Both paths ultimately involve achieving the same goal: elite liberal status, which is the contemporary form of whiteness. One strategy hinges on victimhood, the other on guilt. Still, both end up reinforcing the same liberal orthodoxy—essentially playing into the larger framework that privileges these narratives in the first place. They’re both trying to prove their worth to the same ideological gatekeepers but from different sides of the historical ledger.
Some less sophisticated ones are confused and alternate between both strategies. They don't quite get it.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 2, 2024
I have a lot of reservations about the New Atheists, especially with their atheism as a socio-cultural and political project, but their atheism remains a thousand times more preferable and acceptable than the radical Feuerbachean atheism of Žižek and Marxist thinkers. 🧵
The former, while locked in a truly cartoonish understanding of religion and of the self, remains infinitely more honest and safer. It is very cartoonishness is indeed a testimony to its sincerity.
Its superficiality makes it much safer, like a child who thinks he built his treehouse all on his own and doesn't know that the work was actually done by his father. What the child thinks is of secondary importance to the fact that the treehouse is sturdy and safe for the child.
Read 10 tweets
Jan 27, 2024
Israel should never concede real advantages in exchange for mere promises which their fulfillment is left to circumstance and good-will. The world of states is not determined by legal commitments or moral principles but by interest.
What determines the policy of the United States in the Middle East is not any moral or ideological considerations but how American interests in the region are conceived by Washington.
The only other considerations that historically qualified these considerations have always been the Jewish and later the Evangelical votes for the D and R respectively.
Read 15 tweets
Dec 16, 2023
I have been engaged in pro-Israel circles for over a decade, watching them losing, and sadly only forseeing them to lose even more. The complete denial of the reality of what is the Palestinian Cause actually and the dogmatic insistance on making it /1
newyorker.com/news/annals-of…
Image
exclusively an Islamist/Jihadist issue, a rude intruder on pristine Western political life, the only instance in which the American liberal Jewish establishment actually links up with hawkish conservatives, is both the result of complete mystification of reality as well as /2 Image
the ideological refusal of aknowledging the reality of the tent in which one made their bed. Making it a foreign import of an exotic type of fascism from faraway lands, can make us comfortably delinate identity boundaries in which the forces of civilization and Western glamor /3
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(