Exclusive: Leading charity heads and barristers have condemned the #BordersBill as "overtly racist" newstatesman.com/politics/2022/…
100 civil society figures, including the heads of @samaritans, @RunnymedeTrust and @MABOnline1 described the bill as “a route to disenfranchisement and even deportation of people of colour on an unprecedented scale”.
Signatories also include the barrister @JolyonMaugham and authors @neilhimself and @nikeshshukla
The open letter describes clause nine as “merely the pinnacle of a raft of legislation that has already subjected the citizenship of millions of Britons of foreign heritage, including those born and raised in the United Kingdom, to the caprice of the home secretary”.
It warns that the bill “will effectively make the government unchallengeable and refuge and asylum practically impossible”, and calls on political parties and MPs to “reject it at the first opportunity”.
The #BordersBill "raises a guillotine over the necks of black and brown people in the UK," Jolyon Maugham told the @NewStatesman newstatesman.com/politics/2022/…
You can view the full open letter here, via @WritersofColour mediadiversified.org/2022/01/04/joi…
See our video below on the implications of Clause 9 of the Bill, would would affect the citizenship rights of an estimated six million people in England and Wales (2 in every 5 people from an ethnic minority)
The #BordersBill also targets asylum seekers. Clause 10 would create two classes of asylum seeker, based not on whether they are at risk of persecution but on how they arrived in the UK.
The Bill would allow Priti Patel to discriminate against those who arrived irregularly or via a third "safe" country. She would be allowed to restrict their access to public funds, their rights to family reunion and their rights to acquire British citizenship.
If they happen to give birth to children during those ten years, those children would also be denied citizenship (until the age of 10, or until their parents get citizenship).
The UNHCR @Refugees describes Clause 10 of the #BordersBill as “a recipe for mental and physical ill health, social and economic marginalisation, and exploitation," and says it means that “more women and children are likely to attempt dangerous journeys”. newstatesman.com/politics/2022/…
Read the full open letter, organised by @UK_CAGE and @WritersofColour, here mediadiversified.org/2022/01/04/joi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben van der Merwe

Ben van der Merwe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_BvdM

5 Jan
The government has responded to the petition to repeal Clause 9 of the #BordersBill, which has topped 314k signatures.

Thread 🧵
petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6015…
Government: "Deprivation on ‘conducive to the public good’ grounds [...] has been possible for over a century"
Reality: Deprivation purely on 'conducive to the public goods grounds' has only been possible since 2006. Before then, it was only ever an additional requirement.

E.g. The individual must have committed fraud or treason AND deprivation must be conducive to the public good.
Read 9 tweets
5 Jan
This is untrue.
The facts on removing 🇬🇧 citizenship:

➡️ Deprivation was only possible for treason until 2002
➡️ You can't appeal a decision of which you haven't been notified
➡️ It can be used against any dual citizen if deemed "conducive to the public good"
The #BordersBill allows the government to withhold notification if it is deemed:

➡️ In the interests of national security,
➡️ In the UK's diplomatic interests, or
➡️ Otherwise in the public interest.”
The Home Office until recently was claiming that the Home Secretary couldn't leave anyone stateless.

They've quietly removed that false claim from their 'fact sheet', but it's still up on Twitter.
Read 4 tweets
25 Aug 19
I spent five months undercover in Generation Identity with @hopenothate

I found:
- Links to terrorist group National Action
- Links to the Navy and Trident
- The inside story of their split with Europe

Full story: hopenothate.org.uk/inside-generat…

THREAD:

1/ Back in March, I made a fake Facebook profile and added people on the most extreme, violent fringes of the far-right. People who posted things like this after the Christchurch massacre.

2/ Getting into these circles apparently made me a prime recruitment target. Within days a GI member tried to start a conversation by sending me their DNA ancestry test. Totally normal.
Read 39 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(