They’ve also successfully ignored, silenced, or punished those who formerly made these same critiques. I know. I’m one of their previous targets. 25 yrs ago they attempted to ruin me.
Social media was unavailable to me then. I had no tools to rally support. They held the cards.
Many - if not most - of the early critics were women. (Which, of course, makes theological and sociological sense.)
But there weren't that many evangelical women with doctorates and we were particularly vulnerable to powerful men running ALL evangelical institutions.
In those days, you had to figure out how to critique and survive.
I was too naive to understand that. I thought that sound academic critique was akin to truthfulness-and the "truth will set you free." So, I wrote, spoke, taught history & doctrine as honestly as possible.
I believed that the powers-that-be would welcome honesty from women. After all, they "welcomed" us to the institutions.
(As far as I know, I was the 1st women to EVER teach theology at any evangelical college. Women w/religion PhDs previously taught XianEd, "women's studies.")
(I was hired in 1991 and survived four years)
I thought that women would be the vanguard of a spiritual and intellectual renewal of evangelicalism - that our care for a life of both heart and mind would energize a new Reformation.
My wide-eyed innocence still makes me wonder what the heck I was thinking.
I trusted them. I trusted Jesus. I did everything they told me to do.
Anyway, becuz there were no real networks for women (there was just one & these fathers of today's TGC worked to undermine that), we were generally isolated. Unaware that other evangelical were doing similar work and suffered similar consequences.
But we all heard the rumors.
And, sitting alone in our offices (our emails were monitored, btw), we were afraid.
A generation of passionate, committed, idealistic evangelical women were controlled, silenced, and made to fit in the system. Or no job. Because guess what? If you once taught at an evangelical college, your chance of getting a job at a secular place was really, really low.
I was lucky (I guess). Somebody (a donor? the gatekeepers? a personal enemy?) decided to make an example of me. So, I was booted. At first, I made a bit of a stink of it, but then I left - and made an entirely new life.
The lucky bit: I didn't grow up in evangelicalism. I was from a mainline Protestant family. They mostly thot evangelicalism was a cult. They were angry that I was hurt but relieved w/my "escape."
My mom was my great cheerleader. "Go for it. Be you. Show those boys who you are."
And so I did exactly what I believed Jesus would have me do. I shook the dust off my feet and went to the next village.
While mainline Protestantism is far from perfect, it can be a really decent village. All the ways I had hoped to "reform" evangelicalism were already there!
There was so much I didn't have to fight - instead, I could contribute with love, appreciation, and expertise in a community that listened to and learned from informed critique!
I could also learn, widen my own view, explore the depth of the spiritual journey...
....make friends with people I'd never otherwise meet, hear stories I never would have heard.
I sometimes wonder who I would have been if I'd stayed.
But I can't imagine because I'm so grateful for the life I've had.
Some women didn't make it though. There was a lot of damage. We know the costs. But, if the pain of an earlier generation of evangelical women has contributed even a shred of courage to the women challenging the system, well, more gratitude.
Our only ask: please remember us.
In memory of her. And her. And them.
Those who went before us. Unnamed. But bearers of truly good news and great joy.
Sidebar: The Danvers Statement was the first organized attempt to take down the one network for evangelical feminists (as we were called in those days).
Danvers codified complementarianism. Evang feminism mostly lost to history. The Reformed guys won that round.
Also, this thread should be a chilling reminder that it isn't really about @kkdumez. It is about a multi-generation challenge to the patriarchal structure of American evangelicalism - and that structure's power to abuse, do violence to, and silence critics.
Especially women who dare step out of place.
Not to be a downer, but they aren't going to give up. The Empire will strike back.
(Final note: There's nothing the evangelical patriarchs hate more than a woman who succeeds without or despite them.)
** side note ** shaking dust off one's feet in this situation was not easy - it took time, courage, trauma work, a big theological journey. Some people might call it "deconstruction." I just called it survival.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The 1st creed, forgotten even by Xians, was of human solidarity:
"The original credo (was) something like this: For you are all children of God in the Spirit. There is no Jew or Greek, no slave or free, no male & female; For you are all one in the Spirit."
-Stephen Patterson
Patterson's stunning, award-winning book, "The Forgotten Creed," argues that the first Xian creed insisted on the unity of humankind in God. That it affirmed hope for a world where ethnicity, class, and gender could not be used to divide.
If you recognize that creed, it is because Paul borrowed it & included it in Galatians.
But, as Patterson suggests, it was actually the 1st baptismal creed.
The earliest creed is about justice. It didn't divide between "us" & "them," but was a creed making us all ONE.
When Manchin shifts now on Biden’s bill, it will confirm something I’ve thought obvious - Youngkin and Manchin have been in cahoots. Probably around some WV - VA oil and gas plot.
It is the only thing that explains Manchin’s behavior.
Think about it - Manchin holds off making VA Dems increasingly angry at Biden and pushes open a political door (like in 2009 and Obamacare) for Youngkin. Then, Manchin shifts and regains Dem cred. In the meanwhile, he & Youngkin strike some sort of WV-VA deal - most likely w/coal
Interesting: Glenn Youngkin's campaign is, in part, about his skill as a business leader. But one of the organizations he runs - Meadowkirk - has a failing score on Charity Navigator due solely to poor financial health and bad governance. charitynavigator.org/ein/262213179
This whole story about the retreat center and the church are, well, weird. Is Youngkin using two religious organizations to reduce tax liability? (I don't know - and they aren't saying)
A couple paragraphs deep in this piece about Youngkin's religious views. He literally started a church in his basement founded on the Alpha program - and then bought them a building (which they rent from him for $1 a year). apnews.com/article/busine…
Does Glenn Youngkin use religion to essentially launder money? The Sweet Deal That VA GOP Governor Candidate Glenn Youngkin’s Foundation Gives To A Church And... via @Forbesforbes.com/sites/giacomot…
This is a troubling story - didn't see it until this evening (been following some threads about Youngkin and religion....)
Worth noting that nobody in the media paid attention to the religious dimensions of last GOP governor, Bob McDonnell, whose ties to far right wing Christian views and groups came into play around policies - and the eventual scandal - of his tenure.