This gives me pause.This is not the direction of my fight. Im not interested in seeing people with DSDs as the problem just because TRAs used them to try&assault women’s boundaries
Contrary to TRA assertion,women like me don’t want to karyotype people before giving them access to female spaces. CAIS is a special case. If youre born into a world that instantly sees you as female because of how you’ve developed you are at the same risk other girls are
Then,when you discover your medical condition and that you will never be pregnant you must have so much grief as a result. Discovering youre genetically male,contrary to the apparent external appearance&development of your own body must be a dissonance or difficulty for many
This is not the same as a boy being born,growing up as a boy, developing as a boy, going through male puberty,then turning round&saying he is like us and we should make room for him. Nothing about his life, from his socialisation to his biology, is complicated or requiring nuance
Especially given most such men have a male paraphilia to drive their transition.
I understand the argument of “not giving an inch”. But the people I’m not giving an inch to are the men who tell me we are the same while trying to redefine me as someone who exists to be penetrated
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Book 3 of 2022 was something a bit special. Taken from a publisher who highlights “forgotten books” I managed to find on kindle “What I remember” by Millicent Garrett Fawcett, the famous suffragist. Her words take you straight back to the 1800s…
She covers her life from her own perspective which is fascinating. Not only to understand the time she lived in (she was 4 when Prince Albert had his great exhibition and 2 at the start of the Irish potato famine) but also to glimpse the world in motion in that era
She met her husband at a party when he overheard her views on Lincoln’s assassination. She was a supporter of the north, horrified by slavery and thought Abe was a hero for fighting against it.
I’m amazed at how apologetic I was when i joined this fight. How much I felt the need to soften the blow of every simple truth in order to protect the very people currently removing my rights and threatening me and my fellow women with outrageous harms for not accepting it.
That isn’t compassion,although it pretends to be&feels like it. When someone stamps on your foot hard,&you feel like you need to apologise for putting your foot in their path,that is part of their harm against you. It’s part of their power&it keeps you subordinated to that power
“Please let me justify why I don’t like someone stamping on my foot. Please understand Im not a hateful vindictive person for saying so.”
That’s where many of us start
Guilty for having human needs and monstered for expressing them.
I’m intending to reread Men Trapped in Men’s Bodies but in the meantime I thought I’d do a thread with some extracts from the narratives of men with autogynephilia from the book
Understanding this paraphilia is imperative for all of us talking about the erosion of women’s rights
I think reading this book means a lot of confusing things fall into place for women
Such as the constant evocations of being a “girl” that we see from transwomen. As well as the surprising desire to have a cervical smear or “gynaecological care” that we have sometimes seen.
Despite the quote attributions, these are the words of anon agp transsexuals, not Lawrence.
This informant explained to me why, perhaps, some transwomen go out in extremely revealing and astonishing outfits. Such as the fishnet, breast revealing, top from yesterday