I wrote about how the people who encouraged the Jan 6th insurrection are succeeding with a different strategy a year on: taking control of the machinery of elections. 🧵 donmoynihan.substack.com/p/a-year-on-th…
I've been studying election administration on and off for almost two decades. The concerted attack we are seeing now on local election officials is new. 2/
Steve Bannon has pushed a "precinct strategy"--where Trumpists dedicated to the Big Lie capture the local GOP apparatus--as a means of "taking over all the elections.” (Local party officials appoint key election roles in many states). It's working. 3/ propublica.org/article/heedin…
In addition to the bottom-up "precinct strategy" state laws that give legislatures more control over election positions allows a top-down approach. Here is how it's been used in Georgia. 4/ donmoynihan.substack.com/p/a-year-on-th…
The formal efforts to take control of key election positions is being complemented by an informal but widespread strategy of intimidation of election officials who refused to conform to the Big Lie narrative. This should be a much bigger story. 5/ graphics.reuters.com/USA-ELECTION/T…
If you are a local election official who did a good job in 2020, there is a good chance you have faced accusations of engaging in fraud, or threats to your life. Not surprisingly, many of these officials are quitting. 6/
Again, it's key to understand that formal instruments of power are used to the same end as informal intimidation. Bogus "election audits" are used to threaten election officials. In WI, a former Judge who declared the election was stolen is threatening to jail election officials.
Here is why attacks on election officials matter: a wrench in Trump's 2020 plan to get legislatures to overturn their results was that election officials refused to give them the ammunition to do so. Replace them w Trump loyalists, and the outcome looks very different in 2024. 8/
People are most worried about another attempt to overturn a presidential election. But even if Trumpist targeting of election officials does not determine the 2024 results, it is still doing real damage to our democracy in two ways: undermining competence and legitimacy. 9/
Running election is a complex task, w high stakes and no do-overs, and which we delegate mostly to local government. As we replace experienced and competent professionals with people largely motivated by conspiracy theories, the quality of election administration will fall. 10/
Most Republicans share the false belief of the Jan 6th insurrectionists: that US elections are illegitimate. Their actions show why such beliefs are dangerous for democracy. The current attack on election officials increases the chance Dems will come to share those views. 11/
What to do? The DOJ and local police should be prosecuting death threats to election officials that do not qualify as protected speech. Historically, it's not been a good thing when law enforcement ignored intimidation in American elections. 12/ graphics.reuters.com/USA-ELECTION/T…
Because of the nature of the US system, and the balance of power right now, most solutions depend on both parties at the national level co-operating to protect elections. And that's just not happening b/c one party believes that undermining democracy benefits them. 13/
Whew! Sorry for the long thread. Thanks for reading and sharing. There will be a lot of Jan 6th takes out there today, so I wanted to contribute by providing fact-based insights about election administration, and why it should have us worried for the future. Fin/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The connections are pretty clear. Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society helped bankroll the work of Ginni Thomas. He also arranged for Clarence Thomas to attend Koch fundraisers. propublica.org/article/claren…
The shared purpose of Leonard Leo, Ginni Thomas, Clarence Thomas and the Koch network was to put right-wing judges on the court. And Clarence Thomas used his public position on the court to raise money for that.
Clarence Thomas used to support the Chevron doctrine, which allows delegation to administrative expertise. But the people who fund the Koch network can't buy off administrators, so they want to remove their influence from the process. Now Thomas agrees with the donors.
Also this guy: young people today can't afford a house because they occasionally buy new clothes
If the people @FinancialReview care for free speech at all, they will do the decent thing and allow replies to this tweet, allowing a full and frank exchange of views.
America has 22 times the firearm homicide rates as the European Union.
We are less safe and less free because of how available guns are in this country. healthdata.org/news-events/in…
America makes up about 15% of gun homicides, and together with five other countries constitutes half of gun homicides in the world. vox.com/2018/8/29/1779…
The reason more people in America are dying from guns is because there are more guns in America.
America is the only country with more guns than people. cnn.com/2021/11/26/wor…
New, from me: I wrote about how the emerging debacle at New College (one-third of faculty gone, students can't find classes, housed in airport hotels) reflects the incompetence of populists like DeSantis.
Competence, the ability to perform organizational core tasks, is an underrated quality. It is an especially overlooked quality by people who value other things, like ideological goals, or believe that existing institutions are corrupt, or who have never actually run things.
Fuck Around (left, celebrating the firing of a faculty who criticized the Regents)
and
Find Out: (right, soliciting faculty applications because you don't have enough to teach classes - one-third have left for some reason).
The DeSantis takeover of New College was meant to offer a model of a conservative-run higher ed.
The result is chaos, which is what happens when incompetent people who don't actually care about organizational mission take over public services. insidehighered.com/news/students/…
The NY Times recently featured Chris Rufo to explain how DEI was undermining liberal education.
You know what actually undermines a liberal education?
Losing one-third of faculty.
Not offering core classes to students.
Raging incompetence and blind indifference.
Rufo is seeking to personally recruit replacements. Which is completely at odds with what university trustees are supposed to do. No way that could go wrong, right?
From the internal Texas A&M reports: it was A&M Regents who signaled their opposition to McElroy, at which point the university figured out they would not tenure her.
Seems like the Regents cost A&M $1M. Nice job.
: ... tamus.edu/wp-content/up
Not great when a university President is saying "I'm assuming all texts were deleted" and then tells faculty she was not involved in hiring process. (She has since resigned).