A lot of handwringing about this poll where people say violence against the government can be justified. But the poll doesn’t ask whether it IS CURRENTLY justified. It asks whether it can EVER or NEVER be justified. And “never” is just obviously wrong. washingtonpost.com/context/dec-17…
Our country was founded by a bunch of people who engaged in violence against the government. If our current government is legitimate, then violence against the government has to be justifiable under at least some circumstances.
The poll really just seems to be testing who passed civics, not whether there’s some groundswell of support for violent revolution next Tuesday.
If you worried about those poll results, ask yourself how you’d answer if they polled you. Would you really say violence against the government can *never* be justified? Under any circumstances? Unless you’re an absolute pacifist I doubt you really believe that.
Answers to the follow-up question of WHEN violence might be justified. “Government takes away rights or freedoms” is a little vague (every real world government does that to some extent) but “dictatorship/coup/military takes over” sounds like a pretty good reason. 
It’s true the number of respondents giving the correct answer has increased over time, but given the popularity of coup/military takeover, I don’t know if that’s just radicalized Fox viewers.
It might, e.g., include folks who previously would not have considered the scenario—because it would have seemed too fanciful—that a president might lose an election and seek to cling to power anyway.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
