Douglass Murray tried to destroy my life over tweets that he didn't like with a badly argued and badly written hit piece. So bad, his own fans thought it was embarrassing. In the end, he nuked his own credibility and I enjoyed an outpouring of support. A wonderful start to 2022.
And that's not an exaggeration: Murray called for my professional ruin. I'm a new father, too, and I am just getting started in this industry. Murray's piece had potentially severe consequences for my family. But it took people about 30 seconds to see that his claims were false.
But Murray was also working with Bari Weiss, a supposedly "anti-woke" lib who is never more vicious than against people to her right. Irony: the woman who tried to cancel me is starting a university as an "anti-cancel-culture academic project."
These people built their brand on denouncing frivolous and promiscuous use of bigotry accusations—but they just as eagerly label everyone they dislike with career-ending accusations of "anti-Semite," "racist," etc, without flinching. Why didn't Weiss or Murray contact me first?
The fact that these people can attack from within conservative spaces, with the imprimatur of respectable conservatism, makes them more dangerous than the left. Murray's hit piece on me was amplified by lib journos, by people at The Bulwark and The Dispatch. That's the point.
But the fact that this hit on me was a dud and even backfired—the response to it was overwhelmingly negative—shows that their ability to effectively police people isn't what it used to be, and that is a very good thing. Here's the top comment on Murray's article:
Again, I am tremendously grateful to everyone who defended and supported me. That is ultimately the major difference between now and just a few years ago, when these hits would scatter and demoralize rather than galvanize and unify people.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The whole purpose of the "intellectual dark web" is to ensure genuine opposition to the establishment never takes root. Their problem now, though, is that no one takes them seriously.
It makes sense that the IDW emerged within conservatism because the conservative movement is defined by gatekeeping and purges that protect that establishment above all. But people aren't going along with it anymore. The energy has, indeed, shifted.
The IDW is basically an offshoot of neoconservatism: a bunch of "non-woke libs" welcomed into conservatism who are never more vicious than when attacking people who aren't libs. Old neocons were Trotskyites too but could be insightful sometimes. Can't same the same for IDW types.
MTG has been banned for COVID "misinformation." The move follows the appointment of Twitter's new CEO, Parag Agrawal, who was actually installed by neocon GOP megadonor Paul Singer. Under Agrawal, Twitter's censorship regime has intensified
Before MTG's ban, a new private information policy Agrawal enacted on Nov. 30 also resulted in a Project Veritas affiliated Twitter account being banned for exposing a CNN producer who talked about sex acts with his underage step daughter and solicited pictures of another minor
Now, Agrawal had recently talked specifically about focusing on COVID-19 "misinformation," which is a problem because Agrawal is politically progressive (see the third screenshot) and that censorship will only cut one way, not against people saying we should double mask kids
Getting married and becoming a dad was the best thing that ever happened to me
Remembering all the movies, shows, and jokes that portrayed being married with kids as a drag. Yeah it's not always easy, but it is ultimately the best thing
And if you let it, it's eye opening. Fake political ideologies of conservatism and liberalism vanish and the question becomes what is good for my family and my community
Imagine calling the feds because someone said something mean to you on the internet *in a different country* and then reframing it as an act of bravery
Swalwellian "heroism" is what happens when the virtues of the lowest are elevated as good things, the behavior of the sniveling worm becomes the model
These interviews with advocates of CRT are important:
-they want a narrative of America that emphasizes racial grievances
-Black History Month (February) is insufficient, they want *all* history recast through the lens of racial grievances against whites nbcnews.com/meet-the-press…
I appreciate Jelani Cobb here who says that historical narratives are essentially subjective, and the advocates of CRT has simply chosen to emphasize grievances against white people
The opponents of CRT should not shy away from saying simply, we choose a positive vision of American history, we choose to reject white shaming, anti American, anti Western accounts
Setting aside the fact that the media and liberal intelligentsia lionized people who did things like flip off Trump...
Libs have pissed on Middle Americans, their way of life, their politics, their beliefs, for decades. "Our culture" is built on deriding one half of the country
You don't get to bitch and moan about cultural rot while being indifferent to or downplaying the sustained, increasingly vulgar attacks on the Americans who have been placed on "the wrong side of history" by the freaks who have declared themselves on "the right side of history"
Yes, "Let's Go Brandon" is churlish and in some ways inane because it does not translate into meaningful action. But it's a start, and we should hope that a "fuck you" politics continues to manifest itself in ways like, for example, parents chasing out pro CRT educators