Garland's speech was a call for patience — and a promise of full justice. He explained how massive, complex investigations proceed—from the bottom up, from the small fry to the big fish.
Above all, he pledged that DOJ has "no higher priority," would do "whatever it takes for justice to be done," and would hold "all January 6th perpetrators, at any level, accountable under law—whether they were present that day" at the Capitol or not.
As @RepLizCheney put it in voting to impeach, “The President of the United States summoned this mob, assembled the mob, and lit the flame of this attack.” And he did it all in plain sight.
Garland mustn't fear claims that prosecuting Trump would be political. @SenMinorityLder all but called for Trump's prosecution in February: “We have a criminal justice system in this country,” he said, and “President Trump is still liable for everything he did ... in office.”
DOJ has plenty of statutory tools it could use. 18 U.S.C. §1512(c)(2) punishes "whoever corruptly … obstructs … or impedes any official proceeding." That includes proceedings "before the Congress," such as the joint session for counting electoral votes.
And some criminal law experts have argued that Trump could be held to have aided and abetted the insurrectionists' crimes by doing nothing to stop them.
Trump had the duty to intervene. Instead, he spent hours watching the mayhem on TV. That dereliction, plus is intent to stop the electoral-vote count, ought to land him in jail.
Just as Chris Cuomo had no right to avoid testifying about his advisory communications with his brother's staff, Hannity has no First Amendment or shield law privilege here. ag.ny.gov/sites/default/…
Not even a broad shield law like New York's that probably goes beyond what the 1A provides (a SCOTUS majority never having actually recognized such a journalistic privilege) would help Hannity even if it could be invoked against a congressional subpoena (which it can't).
"I’ve also noticed a naïveté about some of the commentary on Afghanistan. It presumes that there was a clean solution for the U.S., if only the Biden administration (and, to a lesser extent, the Trump administration) had executed it."
"The fundamental choice, as my colleague Helene Cooper told me, was between a permanent, low-level U.S. war in Afghanistan — a version of what John McCain once called a 100-year war — and a messy exit."
"For 20 years, at a cost of 2,448 American lives and more than 1 trillion taxpayer dollars, we attempted to do what the shopkeeper knew we could not: outlast the Taliban. We built schools and hospitals; we trained, paid and supplied the Afghan military."
"In exchange, we got an Afghan army that laid down its weapons and government leadership that fled the country. By pursuing this full-scale nation-building effort, rather than a small-scale counterterror operation, we gave up what little advantage we ever had over the Taliban."
Received this fundraising email last night from the National Republican Senatorial Committee, urging me to give them money lest the darkness of Democrat mRNA vaccine totalitarianism destroy our great land:
The email linked to a WinRed page that, so very conveniently, prechecked the recurring donation boxes so that the NRSC can regularly take money from people without having to ask.
A tfg advisor, on why it was so utterly insane for tfg to think that Pence would end American democracy to keep tfg in the White House:
“It’s the ultimate irony that a guy who acted like a total sycophantic pussy for four years, Trump wants him to be the Six Million Dollar Man at the end. Well, shit, the guy hasn’t stood up to anybody for four years ..."