Good news from Ontario - the omicron "vaccine hole" seems to have a ceiling that's holding. There is still mild protection from vaccine, whereas ICU/hospitalization remains robust. (Updated today)
Suspect a portion is due to "who goes for tests."
/1
In BC, the variable of age plays large into the seemingly negative vaccine effectiveness. Age is such a massive variable that age standardization flips whether or not vaccines show effectiveness to reducing cases.
/2
While the monthly stats still look quite vaccine-protective, this is shifting rapidly and the past few days have seen higher rates of vaccine cases than unvax cases.
/3
Recent days have a blip where it appears that being vaccinated leads to a higher rate of infection than being infected.
I am sure this type of bias has a name (blanking on it), the "time window" bias. When our time frame is 1 day, yes, we see this.
/4
To show you why the story isn't as bleak as this graph suggests, let's recreate the graph in excel (AHHH @bccdc i had to type this in by hand it was soooooo annoying please let us download data!!! :) )
Here it is: July 1 2021 to Jan 3, 2022
/5
Now, lets change this to cumulative case rate.
I personally think that it is very unlikely that vaccinated case rates will overtake unvaccinated case rates, knowing that our vaccines ARE protective and have efficacy (Even waning) against Omicron.
/6
So likely, we will continue to see a dramatically lower (but positive) efficacy of vaccines than we're used to. We will see many more vaccinated cases of covid.
But vaccines still are preventative of infection overall, definitely remain protective of hospitalization & death.
/7
This effect is statistically very nunaced, so media people, please consult with statisticians! Don't look at the charts yourself!
a) vaccinated people and unvaccinated get TESTED at different rates
b) unvaccinated people have a much higher cumulative rate
/8
c) omicron reduces VE, so we will see more vaccinated people get covid
Good luck as we enter THIS murky phase.
Vaccine Effectiveness over time (cumulative)
Same plot, but using "daily rate"
both need to be taken together and understood in both the large context of vaccination, as well as what will happen when a "breakthrough variant" (with a lower VE) establishes dominance. We will see this shift.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The core trick: he treats prescription prevalence as self-evidently bad. But high rates only signal a problem if the meds don't work, are given to people who don't need them, or cause net harm. He establishes none of this. He just gestures at numbers.
/2
The same rhetorical structure would indict insulin prescribing, or asthma inhalers. Prevalence is not pathology. The question is whether treatment matches need — and whether the alternative (untreated illness) is better or worse.
/3
It makes no sense the way we treat our people with disabilities in Canada. Canada has the full apparatus to implement adjusted payments, yet we typically support disabled people WELL under the poverty line.
/1
Canada has an official poverty line: the Market Basket Measure. It's regionally calibrated, methodologically sound, and updated by StatCan.
A single person on BC PWD receives ~$18.4k/year. The Vancouver MBM is ~$29k.
That's not a rounding error. It's a structural choice.
PWD recipients in Vancouver sit at roughly 47% of the poverty line and below the Deep Income Poverty threshold (75% of MBM), which is the level StatCan uses to flag the worst material deprivation in the country.
/3
To be clear, my first answer is "well we know they are supposed to block serotonin reuptake, but it's not that simple and we don't really know."
But, if you want the best 2026 science...
/1
For a few particularly science-interested patients, I walk them through what we currently have for the 'best evidence' even though we're still not sure.
This is the "best story" I can tell about SSRI's right now.
(nb, this is NOT locked in, this is MY best synthesis)
/2
1) SSRIs BLOCK the Serotonin Transporter
The protein that pulls serotonin back into the neuron after its released is blocked. Serotonin lingers longer in the synapse, the gap where neurons signal each other.
This is very well established, & how SSRIs were designed.
The Ihben story is making the rounds. "Judge forced 18 vaccines, child got autism." It's being treated as a smoking gun. It is not a smoking gun. It is barely a story.
Sourcing: one father, one advocacy org (CHD), one GiveSendGo. Records sealed. No filings. No named physicians. Every outlet repeating it cites the same Defender article. This is a closed loop, not corroboration.
/2
"18 vaccines in one day" is not a thing. That number counts antigens as doses to make the headline scream. Real catch-up schedules don't work this way and you can verify that in five minutes on the CDC site.
/3
Ask any person who has been even suggested to have BPD; they will uniformly tell you that they have been told to try DBT (Dialectical Behavioural Therapy). Reflexively recommended. "Gold standard."
This is not science-supported.
/1
Quick history: Marsha Linehan developed DBT in the late 1980s, published the foundational manual in 1993. She drew on CBT, Zen Buddhism, and dialectical philosophy. Brilliant clinician, brilliant marketer. Her institute has trained tens of thousands of therapists worldwide.
/2
That marketing machine is the reason DBT is "the BPD treatment." It is not the reason DBT works better than alternatives, because it does not.
The faint superiority signals in older trials evaporate once you adjust for allegiance bias (DBT researchers studying DBT).
/3
The McCullough Foundation's @NicHulscher — who posts garbage medical misinformation — styles himself an "independent epidemiologist."
His entire career has been spent publishing with, and working for, McCullough.
No academic post, no health agency, no clinical role, no pre-Foundation experience. Hired straight out of his 2024 MPH by the senior author on nearly every paper bearing his name.
/2
He publishes almost exclusively with McCullough, overwhelmingly in predatory or fringe journals, and has already been retracted twice — plus an Expression of Concern — in a career that's barely two years old.
/3