Good news from Ontario - the omicron "vaccine hole" seems to have a ceiling that's holding. There is still mild protection from vaccine, whereas ICU/hospitalization remains robust. (Updated today)
Suspect a portion is due to "who goes for tests."
/1
In BC, the variable of age plays large into the seemingly negative vaccine effectiveness. Age is such a massive variable that age standardization flips whether or not vaccines show effectiveness to reducing cases.
/2
While the monthly stats still look quite vaccine-protective, this is shifting rapidly and the past few days have seen higher rates of vaccine cases than unvax cases.
/3
Recent days have a blip where it appears that being vaccinated leads to a higher rate of infection than being infected.
I am sure this type of bias has a name (blanking on it), the "time window" bias. When our time frame is 1 day, yes, we see this.
/4
To show you why the story isn't as bleak as this graph suggests, let's recreate the graph in excel (AHHH @bccdc i had to type this in by hand it was soooooo annoying please let us download data!!! :) )
Here it is: July 1 2021 to Jan 3, 2022
/5
Now, lets change this to cumulative case rate.
I personally think that it is very unlikely that vaccinated case rates will overtake unvaccinated case rates, knowing that our vaccines ARE protective and have efficacy (Even waning) against Omicron.
/6
So likely, we will continue to see a dramatically lower (but positive) efficacy of vaccines than we're used to. We will see many more vaccinated cases of covid.
But vaccines still are preventative of infection overall, definitely remain protective of hospitalization & death.
/7
This effect is statistically very nunaced, so media people, please consult with statisticians! Don't look at the charts yourself!
a) vaccinated people and unvaccinated get TESTED at different rates
b) unvaccinated people have a much higher cumulative rate
/8
c) omicron reduces VE, so we will see more vaccinated people get covid
Good luck as we enter THIS murky phase.
Vaccine Effectiveness over time (cumulative)
Same plot, but using "daily rate"
both need to be taken together and understood in both the large context of vaccination, as well as what will happen when a "breakthrough variant" (with a lower VE) establishes dominance. We will see this shift.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Battling Election Misinformation
Part 2: "The Mandate"
Contrary to media/republican pronouncements, the election of Donald Trump was one of the narrowest (by popular vote, +1.73%) in history, with only 7 elections since 1800 being narrower.
/1
In fact, if we look at the margin of victory when we include all eligible voters, Trump wins with 31.3% of the voting population, compared to Harris' 30.2% and 1% going to other candidates. 37.4% did not vote.
If we only include voters, Trump wins 50.03% to 49.97%
/2
When we look at the electoral college results, Trump won 58% of available electoral college votes. This would rank his election 41st out of 57 elections since 1800.
"[AIDS] is not being caused by a virus. It's not a virus... These people are dying because of 'poppers'... they were people who were part of a gay lifestyle... "
"This is not a viral disease, but it's a disease that is environmental."
- HHS Secretary Nominee RFK Jr
/1
Chemicals in water are causing trans kids: "A lot of the problems we see in kids... are coming from chemical exposures, including a lot of the sexual dysphoria that we’re seeing."
- HHS Secretary Nominee RFK Jr
/2
Wifi radiation causes autism, allergies, asthma, eczema: “I think it degrades your mitochondria and it opens your blood-brain barrier,”
🧵Battling Antivax Disinfo🧵
Vaccination did NOT increase cancer deaths.
Here I took the 6 deadliest cancers (all 5 survival rates under 50%) in a highly vaccinated population (25-54), and we can see ZERO evidence of vaccine-related cancer deaths, all the way to May 2024.
/1
If i move ages to 55+, we see the same thing, and we are now looking at a lot of deaths from these extremely aggressive cancers, so this isn't some underpowered stuff here. There is NO evidence that deadly cancers have increased due to vaccination.
None.
/2
If we take all ages 5+ and look for until May 2024, we see no increase in these highly aggressive cancer deaths, or any cancer deaths.
The Presidential Election
Data Geekery with my interpretations
1) The Country Shifted, but More Didn't.
The final share will be ~ +1.3 to +1.5% for Trump, which is a shift of ~+5.8%.
If America was a room with 65 people in it, only 2 out of the 65 people switched shirts.
/1
Note: this math might seem like it doesn't work, but we have to remember to include those that voted 3rd party (1.5%ish) and those that didn't vote (about 35%).
Excluding non-voters who were eligible,
2020: 22/43 D & 20/43 R
2024: 20/42 D & 21/42 R
/2
In other words, the great majority of the country didn't switch, but we know there was definitely a nudge towards republican vote.
What does this mean?
The narratives about "America changing" should be very cautious, as 93% of America did not change.
/3
🚨COVID-19 Vaccination saves lives and improves outcomes 🚨
In this UK study of >3 MILLION PEOPLE who vaccinated, the incidence of mental health problems was significantly reduced when a subsequent COVID-19 infection occurred.
/1
Looking at the totals who were infected with COVID-19, it is clear that COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with a ROBUST increase in mental health problems after the diagnosis.
/2
This adds to the massive and still growing body of evidence that Covid 19 Vaccination was safe, effective, and extremely important especially considering that after this study, virtually everyone was infetcted with COVID-19.
/3
Yet another study finding differential impacts (mostly with decrease of symptoms) on the mental health of youth comparing prepandemic to pandemic times.
The media far far far less likely to report on these now common findings.
/1
My colleagues and I talked about this at length, that there were many reasons to be cautious about the early "expert predictions" and in fact when good evidence was considered, many so-called evidence based scientists were wrong: dire outcomes on mental health harder to find.
/2
Our '23 peer-reviewed commentary here, g despite many professionals who attacked my us for daring to suggest we interpret evidence cautiously rather than childishly reducing issues & acting like sensationalists, I am certain our publciation holds up well.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…