Good news from Ontario - the omicron "vaccine hole" seems to have a ceiling that's holding. There is still mild protection from vaccine, whereas ICU/hospitalization remains robust. (Updated today)
Suspect a portion is due to "who goes for tests."
/1
In BC, the variable of age plays large into the seemingly negative vaccine effectiveness. Age is such a massive variable that age standardization flips whether or not vaccines show effectiveness to reducing cases.
/2
While the monthly stats still look quite vaccine-protective, this is shifting rapidly and the past few days have seen higher rates of vaccine cases than unvax cases.
/3
Recent days have a blip where it appears that being vaccinated leads to a higher rate of infection than being infected.
I am sure this type of bias has a name (blanking on it), the "time window" bias. When our time frame is 1 day, yes, we see this.
/4
To show you why the story isn't as bleak as this graph suggests, let's recreate the graph in excel (AHHH @bccdc i had to type this in by hand it was soooooo annoying please let us download data!!! :) )
Here it is: July 1 2021 to Jan 3, 2022
/5
Now, lets change this to cumulative case rate.
I personally think that it is very unlikely that vaccinated case rates will overtake unvaccinated case rates, knowing that our vaccines ARE protective and have efficacy (Even waning) against Omicron.
/6
So likely, we will continue to see a dramatically lower (but positive) efficacy of vaccines than we're used to. We will see many more vaccinated cases of covid.
But vaccines still are preventative of infection overall, definitely remain protective of hospitalization & death.
/7
This effect is statistically very nunaced, so media people, please consult with statisticians! Don't look at the charts yourself!
a) vaccinated people and unvaccinated get TESTED at different rates
b) unvaccinated people have a much higher cumulative rate
/8
c) omicron reduces VE, so we will see more vaccinated people get covid
Good luck as we enter THIS murky phase.
Vaccine Effectiveness over time (cumulative)
Same plot, but using "daily rate"
both need to be taken together and understood in both the large context of vaccination, as well as what will happen when a "breakthrough variant" (with a lower VE) establishes dominance. We will see this shift.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Placebo-controlled trials compare a vaccine to an inactive substance (placebo). This helps measure how effective the vaccine is. In the case of vaccines, often, the placebo is not "saline", but rather a previous vaccine or vaccine solution.
/1
When a safe, effective vaccine already exists, using an inactive placebo means some participants are deliberately left unprotected against disease. This creates unnecessary harm.
/2
Ethical standards require minimizing harm and offering participants the best available care. When a proven vaccine exists, denying it to anyone—regardless of location—is unethical.
/3
In Canada during the Delta wave, vaccination prevented infection (unvaccinated 6x higher chance of being infected). As well, being unvaccinated led to a 22X chance of being hospitalized and an 18X chance of dying.
/1
For confirmed infections, the IFR for unvaccinated was a whopping 2.4%. The IFR for being vaccinated was much lower, both due to preventing infection and reducing the consequences of it.
Delta was a very deadly strain, and unvaccinated people died/suffered the most.
/2
When Omicron hit, it was a strain that evaded vaccinations, leading to enormous numbers of infections, even in vaccinated people.
However, the immunity protection vs hospitalization and death was still enormous, and unvaccinated Canadians were 12X more likely to die.
Correcting revisionist history:
"COVID is not a problem for young people in the US"
Covid responsible (not "with", underlying cause) for 2% of all deaths <20. That's 1 out of every 50 deaths of all kids who die. #1 in infectious diseases, 5th in disease overall.
/1
COVID-19 deaths created 300,000 American orphans, 330,000 if we count "primary caregivers" and 380,000 if we count "secondary caregivers". That's a lot of childhood harm.
2x as common for Black kids
4x as common for Indigenous kids
1.6X as common for Hispanic kids
/2
Our most vulnerable children, with medical illnesses, suffered the most during the pandemic. Children with heart disease, respiratory disease, neurologic diseases, and chromosomal abnormalities suffered more severe symptoms than did children without those conditions.
Why do you use pronouns in your bio?
Because it's an easy way to promote inclusivity & to increase awareness of gender expression. It costs me nothing, &because I work with kids who are establishing their identity it shows that I don't make assumptions.
/1
Is being transgender a mental illness?
Being transgender is not a mental illness. It is a natural variation of human phenotype, though some transgender individuals may experience distress, called gender dysphoria, which is addressed through appropriate care.
/2
Can a man be a woman?
Yes. Some individuals identify as a gender different from their assigned sex at birth.
"What is a woman?"
A woman is a female by identity. This can refer to biological sex identity or social gender identity, depending on the context.
/3
🧵RFK Jr. is an antivax, AIDS-denying, absolutely antiscientific conspiracist.🧵
ANTIVAX:
“They get [vaccinated], that night they have a fever of 103, they go to sleep, and three months later their brain is gone... This is a Holocaust, what this is doing to our country.”
/1
ANTIVAX:
"I do believe that autism does come from vaccines"
Metaanalyses involving MILLIONS of children have confirmed there is no link. The lie started with another antivaxxer, disgraced fraudster Andrew Wakefield, who fabricated data.
/2
ANTIVAX:
"I've read all the science on autism and I can tell you, if you want to know... If it didn't come from the vaccines, then where did it come from?"
Autism primarily from combo of genetic factors & early brain development differences.
Battling Election Misinformation
Part 2: "The Mandate"
Contrary to media/republican pronouncements, the election of Donald Trump was one of the narrowest (by popular vote, +1.73%) in history, with only 7 elections since 1800 being narrower.
/1
In fact, if we look at the margin of victory when we include all eligible voters, Trump wins with 31.3% of the voting population, compared to Harris' 30.2% and 1% going to other candidates. 37.4% did not vote.
If we only include voters, Trump wins 50.03% to 49.97%
/2
When we look at the electoral college results, Trump won 58% of available electoral college votes. This would rank his election 41st out of 57 elections since 1800.