I’m just an ordinary Joe. I never thought I’d be sitting here reading transcripts trying to understand what it was that put our democracy in such peril. @JoeBiden seems like an ordinary Joe who also finds himself trying to understand.
Is Joe Oltmann an ordinary Joe? A wee🧵👇🏻
This thread attempts to follow what has been laid out before us in the Eric Coomer v trump et al, defamation lawsuit and what, if anything, it may be able to tell us about January 6th. Here are the documents in that case. *Full Link👇🏻 Let’s level set. courts.state.co.us/Courts/County/…
I’ll be using these documents and others showing portions as we go along. The link👆🏻is for reference. I attempt to place them in a timeline of sorts and add context as appropriate. We need to see these activities in their totality, not just within the confines of the Coomer case.
A man from Colorado named Joe Oltmann dialed into what he called an ‘Antifa call’. He alleges on that call a man named Eric from Dominion made sure trump didn’t win the election. This is a basic paraphrasing to just get us all on the same page.
Here we go…
In November of 2020 a gathering of sorts took place at property in South Carolina owned by Lin Wood. This gathering included Mike Flynn, Seth Keshel, Joe Oltmann, Sidney Powell and others. They also had the tools necessary for planning. Whiteboards etc.
The obvious question is, ‘Plan what?’. We can look to what was produced from this month long retreat just after the election and the things that occurred prior to January 6th. Lawsuits were filed, cries of election fraud and The ‘Kraken’ entered our lexicon and State Houses.
In the summer of 2020 you will remember we had a number of protests. Murals were painted on walls, Black Lives Matter echoed through the streets. This did not sit well with some. Some perceived these marches for peace to be a sign of aggression against them.
One such situation occurred in the Denver area. Here is a portion of an affidavit (full link👆🏻😉) signed by Auontai ‘Tay’ Anderson. This is important because it tells us the date that phone call Joe Oltmann said was an ‘Antifa call’, occurred on. It was September 25, 2020.
On November 6, 2020, Joe Oltmann was in Colorado hunting elk. While on this hunting trip, Oltmann received a text message. Along with the text is an article. Oltmann reads it.
Upon receiving this message and article, Oltmann realizes the significance and importance of the ‘Antifa call’ he was on in September. Presumably upon returning from his trip, Oltmann goes on his podcast on November 9th and tells the world his story of Eric Coomer.
The Conservative Daily podcast is a podcast hosted by Joe Oltmann, or Joe Otto if you like. It is on his November 9th podcast, six days after the election, he tells us about a man who works for Dominion voting systems with the capabilities to make sure trump is not re-elected.
With this podcast, we hear allegations of election fraud. What happens next is extraordinary. One day later, on November 10, Taylor Scott, the Executive Assistant to the CEO of OAN, sends an email to Joe Oltmann asking if there is any evidence to prove voter fraud.
It would appear that OAN wants the story, and they are not alone. On November 12, 2020 Randy Corporon, a lawyer who founded Arapahoe County Tea Party and sued to prevent mask mandates, sends a Signal text to Michelle Malkin regarding Joe Oltmann.
Michelle Malkin was an independently contracted journalist for Newsmax, a Fox News contributor, and has appeared on Sean Hannity’s show, and she also does a live stream on various social media platforms. adl.org/blog/michelle-…
Corporon proves to be a good contact to have, because Michelle Malkin lands an interview with Oltmann. The interview is done via live stream on November 13, 2020.
On November 15, 2020, Joe Oltmann emails Chanel Rion of OAN that he has sent information to OAN and can send it to her as well. Rion responds to that email by telling Oltmann she is ‘working on an investigative special - working with Rudy and Sidney.’
Let’s pause here and remember it is mid November. There is a group of people at Tomotley, Lin Wood’s place in South Carolina. Remember the group includes Sidney Powell and Mike Flynn. Whatever they were up to, journalist Chanel Rion just told us she was working with Sidney.
This information comes to us in another form as well. Recently, Bernie Kerik provided the @January6thCmte with documents that show there is a Research Team inclusive of ‘CR’ and ‘SP’.
Back to Nov 15th. Michelle Malkin receives a text from Lauren McLaughlin, a former executive producer of Sean Hannity’s radio show, that says she (Lauren) is working with Sidney Powell and Don Brown, that they saw her Oltmann interview and wanted to get an affidavit.
Let’s absorb what this means. Sidney Powell’s team requested that Joe Oltmann create an affidavit that would later be used as the cornerstone of the Kraken. The ask was made via two journalists with ties to Fox News. It is at this point we need to recall what Phil Waldron said.
Phil Waldron is said to be integral to that PowerPoint presentation for Mark Meadows. Waldron worked with Mike Flynn at Defense Intelligence Agency. Waldron also says they were looking for ‘competing theories’, ‘alternatives’ to explain the voting data they were reviewing.
If the Research Team, Giuliani’s Legal Team (see Bernie Kerik doc👆🏻), and the Red Team (📌2) were all looking for a simple narrative about election fraud to contextualize their data, one had just presented itself in the form of Joe Oltmann.
Four days after Powell’s request, on November 19,2020, an affidavit was sent from Oltmann to Sidney Powell alleging vote switching. A portion is below (*full link👆🏻).
Also that day Powell, Rudy Giuliani, Jenna Ellis and others participated in a press conference. Yea, that one.💧
Sidney Powell, Newsmax, and OAN were not the only ones interested in Oltmann’s story. A national radio show broadcast on the Salem Radio Network called ‘The Eric Metaxas Show’ also spoke with Joe Oltmann. This is a show popular among Christians.
On November 20th, 2020, a woman named Susan Pausky introduced Eric Metaxas to Joe Oltmann through Metaxas’ friend Kurt Nelson. Nelson is the President and CEO of a Christian organization called EastWest Ministries.
On November 24, 2020 Joe Oltmann is interviewed by Eric Metaxas. Also on November 24th, Michelle Malkin asks Oltmann to appear on her Newsmax show. One can see that this is a story that someone really wants spread to the masses.
Also November 24th, Don brown sends an email to congressman Ralph Norman with the subject line: ‘Explanation of hard evience expected on national voter fraud case’ in this email he mentions Matthew Braynard. Notice this email was sent to a sitting Congressman.
If the name Matthew Braynard is familiar to you, it could be because he is the Executive Director of Look Ahead America. Maybe this will jog your memory.
On November 25, 2020, Michelle Malkin pre-records an interview of Joe Oltmann for a segment that will air on Newsmax on November 28th (📌3). Also on November 25, 2020 Lt General Mike Flynn receives a pardon from trump. Have I mentioned Mike Flynn was at Tomotley, too?
Remember Phil Waldron was looking for competing theories? Flynn and Waldron are both former Defense Intelligence Agency. They are trained in unconventional warfare. The kind of warfare that uses information. Like the type of information contained in an affidavit.
This continued past November, into December, through January. More requests for Joe Oltmann were being made. This is one from another person who worked with Sidney Powell on election fraud claims in a case in Arizona. Oltmann’s affidavit was to be their predicate for litigation.
We need to know why this story was so important to Randy Corporon, Chanel Rion, Kurt Nelson, Eric Metaxas, and Sidney Powell. We need to know if this story served the needs of what was being planned at Tomotley. We need to know if this story was a plant.
If so, did it come about organically or was it part of a grander scheme to subvert the election and thus our democracy? What purpose is it continuing to serve? The reason I ask this question is because Joe Oltmann is a speaker on Clay Clark and Mike Flynn’s Reawaken Tours.
And wouldn’t you know it, as of December 22, 2021, Mike Flynn’s colleague and host of the ReAwaken, Reopen, and Health and Freedom Tours Clay Clark, is being sued by Eric Coomer. bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/csindy.com/con…
📌1 was about the Red Team. During Mike Lindell’s Cyber Symposium, Lindell said Phil Waldron lead a ‘red team’. How did just an ordinary Joe from Colorado, know to reference the ‘Red Team’ in this email to Sidney Powell on January 22, 2021?
And why did Eric Coomer’s attorney ask Michelle Malkin this question? Ramsland? Who said anything about Ramsland?
📌2 was about research. Perhaps we should find out the identity of ‘The Researcher’. Is this also the person that sent the text message with the article to Oltmann on His hunting trip?
If you’ve made it this far, I thank you. We’ve been through a lot together. If you are interested in reading more about the Mike Flynn/ Clay Clarke Tours for Christians referenced above please read this. But, maybe pour a drink first.
END
Did you know the final speaker to take the stage the night of January 5th at the Rally held at the Freedom Plaza was Joe Oltmann? He went on right after Roger Stone and presented that vote flow chart of his to the crowd.
We are in the Both Sides Era. For what seems the past decade, we have been subjected to both sides of the news, normalizing the weird, accepting the inappropriate, and moving on from the unforgivable.
Both sides are not the same.
A wee Sunday morning coffee🧵👇🏻
We have been so conditioned to Both Sides everything that we immediately fall into one side or the other. We are sorting ourselves based on memes and shallow thinking. Reporters complaining about hotel experiences due to the DNC running late, isn’t news. That’s a yelp review.
Have you noticed trump is on both sides of every issue? Probably not, because the “press hasn’t yet learned how to report on trump.” Why is covering trump any different from what they learned in journalism school?
Why not ask him about his incongruities? Or a follow up question?
Did you ever hear the phrase: “they have so much money they don’t know what to do with it.”? Not a problem, I’ve ever run into myself, but Project 2025 is just that. Billionaires want to be bankers. They want to sell off our governmental oversight to private companies they own.
Here is Project 2025. There isn’t one part of our lives this won’t touch. Think it doesn’t mean you? There is no provision to exclude from its effects those who vote for fascism so choose your candidate wisely.
Here is the part where they will abolish the federal reserve. It will be replaced by currency they can “create” and then lend out at their own interest rates.
“There is no place for political violence” has been a pretty common refrain throughout the weekend. It really got me thinking. ”Political violence” must be one of those “you know it when you see it” types of things.
Let’s see…
🧵👇🏻
Political violence strikes me as a visual medium but there are so many things that occur before we see the blood that I think might be political violence. Are we just numb to it? How do we define what is political violence and what is just violence? Why is it different?
Are Texas Gov Greg Abbott’s razor balls floating in the river, considered “political violence”? Kind of. I mean, the idea is people from south of the US shouldn’t be allowed to come here and take our jobs.
Political.
To deter from this, razor balls in the river.
Violence.
There’s been a lot said about Joe Biden since the debate. I, along with so many of you, watched it play out in real time as respected news transmitters read out ‘inside texts’ from knee jerk reactionaries.
After much thought, I won’t be voting for Joe Biden because he’s old.
🧵👇🏻
I’ll be voting for Joe Biden because he’s team democracy. I’m voting for ideas he represents. I’m voting for the team of people he can put together. I’m voting for my own interests and for your ability to vote for your own interests. I didn’t vote for him last time either, btw.
In 2020, I voted for a November 5th, 2024 election. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were the only options on the ballot that allowed this. I colored in Joe and Kamala’s bubble to keep the lights on long enough for us to have this election. Like many of you, I voted team democracy.
I am loathe to do predictions. However, there are some things you just can’t help but see coming. Project 2025 is a blinking red alarm and we all need to be aware of the stakes of this election. Please familiarize yourself with EO11246, be discriminating voters.
A wee thread🧵👇🏻
On September 24th, 1965 President Lyndon Johnson signed Executive Order 11246. EO11246 established Equal Opportunity Employment. It includes Non-Discrimination in Government. It includes Non-Discrimination Employment by Government Contractors and Subcontractors.
Focus on Non-Discrimination Employment by Government Contractors and Subcontractors. In Sub Part B under Contractor’s Agreements, contractors agree to not discriminate against employees based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Trust me…
🧵👇🏻
The above is the oath the President takes at 12 noon on January 20. Typically, it is administered by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court but there is no law that makes that a requirement. You could have your gran do it. So why is it *usually* the Chief Justice?
For this thread let’s assume the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is there as a symbol of the law. Chief Justice Roberts in a way represents the Judicial Branch of our government on the day it grants power to the person who will symbolize the Executive Branch.