Fascinated to read in @Londoners_Diary that someone has put my criticisms of Stolen Focus to @johannhari101 and that he replied by saying that the "attention crisis" is real because "we sleep less than we did in the past". standard.co.uk/news/londoners…
Sorry to sound like a stuck record, but this is another issue on which Stolen Focus cherry-picks and exaggerates. Sleep deprivation is bad for you, that's obvious. But is there really a historic decline in the number of hours we spend asleep?
In this melange of stats (some plucked from Gallup polls), Johann acknowledges that there is "a scientific debate about the extent our sleep loss" - but he doesn't tell you about evidence that points in the opposite direction - that we're actually sleeping more than we once did.
And another. There's a reason why those ads on the tube that ask - "do you feel tired all the time" - are so seductive. But just because something feels true doesn't mean it's right. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
I think historians can help here. How can sleep be in sharp decline when working hours, historically, have also declined? Think of those unsleeping miners described by Orwell. Or think of the mysterious patterns of the medieval night.
I don't know how much more I really have to say about this, but here's my thought for now. If books are published that attempt to pathologist the experience of modernity - to tell you that everyday life is reducing your brainpower - they need better evidence than this.
Anyway, more things we might have discussed had he turned up to the studio.
Pathologise, sorry!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Well, I was booked to go on @BBCRadio4 PM to challenge @johannhari101 about assertions made in his new book. He has pulled out for "personal reasons", so I'll just leave a thread about my concerns about his use of sources. I hope someone else will raise these questions with him.
Stolen Focus book is full of stats, full of references to scientific research. Can its author be trusted to handle this research – not to cherry-pick to help his case? I'll let you judge.
Let’s look at two examples. This is from a chapter about multitasking, but it also reaches towards Hari’s main point – that the seductions of digital culture are reducing our powers of concentration.
It was easy to find the url for the study because anti-vax and conspiracy theory Twitter has gone wild for it.
It’s by someone called Baruch Vainshelboim. He seems to be a sports physiologist with some link to Stanford. But the publication in which his work appears is not peer-reviewed, and it has weird spelling mistakes and footnotes with no page refs.
The Carry Ons will be rightly prominent in the obits today, but I want to think of Barbara Windsor like this today, as key member of Joan Littlewood’s revolution in theatre. In 2014 I met with her at Stratford East to discuss her part in Oh What a Lovely War!
We talked about taking the play to New York, how she gave free tickets to the Quakers holding a vigil in Times Square for the victims of the war in Vietnam. Here she is with Littlewood arriving at the airport.
We also talked about Michael Gove, who had written about the play in the Daily Mail as a “prime source of left wing myths” that reflected “the unhappy compulsion ... to denigrate virtues such as patriotism, honour and courage.”
Something happened today I’ll remember forever. A discussion on dictatorship for @BBCFreeThinking. This is Francesca Santoro L’hoir. Born 1933. As a little girl she acted with Chaplin in The Great Dictator. Could you read the last speech for us, I asked? She did. Devastatingly.
Here she is on the set with Chaplin, and in her scene in the movie as Aggie.
So as we’re all here, puzzling over the moment an apparent LaRouche activist used Jonathan Swift’s A Modest Proposal to troll @AOC, it might be a good moment for me to list Lyndon LaRouche’s ten most insane conspiracy theories, just so it’s clear who they are.
1) The Queen controls the international drugs trade, to fund the British Empire, which still rules the world in secret.
2) The Queen, Obama and the Duke of Edinburgh plotted to reduce the world’s population to 1 billion by starting a nuclear war. (Obama very much the junior partner in this.)
It’s that moment when your obscure research subject pops up in the news. Yesterday @AOC was confronted by a woman claiming to be a climate activist at a town hall meeting. Her proposal to solve the climate crisis - “eat the babies”.
. @AOC did not denounce this woman. She thought that she was suffering from some kind of mental illness, and treated her kindly. But all kinds of figures on the right and the alt-right have pounced on the story. Including the President.
So who was this woman? Not a climate activist. Not even, perhaps, someone with a mental illness. She is a representative of the bizarre political cult once led by Lyndon LaRouche. Previous targets for this kind of stunt include @Janefonda Olof Palme & Michael Dukakis. Now @AOC.