The fixes suggested here for healing the racial divide offer no real solutions because they ignore how entrenched racism stands at the core of the split. White supremacy never gives up without a fight. You don't solve the crisis of democracy by ignoring it's central problems. 1/
In “Cease-Fire in the Culture Wars,” Yascha Mounk blames "the elite" for endangering democracy by putting Trump voters "on the receiving end of a culture war in which the most powerful elements of their own societies look down on them.”
His solution?
Liberal democracies "need to embrace a more ambitious vision of diversity by promising all citizens—majority and minority—social respect and a place at the table." In other words, we need more respect for bigotry, sexism, anti-science ignorance, and gaslighting authoritarianism.
Meanwhile, in "Break Down Barriers," Eduardo Porter says liberal democracy must appeal to "the angry citizens threatening to bring it down." He blasts "anti-racism" for being “divisive by design—cleaving the nation into antagonistic racist and anti-racist camps.”
His solution?
Porter's fix for rising authoritarianism is the creation of affordable housing and desegregating public schools by class and race. Because, as history shows, there's no better way to soothe sensitive white folks than by promoting racial integration of neighborhoods and schools.
Anne-Marie Slaughter calls for healing through "effective conflict resolution." Mostly this means acknowledging "the country's past misdeeds" and accepting how "democracy is failing specific groups, often ethnic, racial, and other minorities."
While I share Slaughter's goals, it's unclear how "effective conflict resolution" and "speaking truth to power" will resolve things with the many who want to ban the teaching of "the country's past misdeeds" and speak disinformation rather than truth.
The rise of authoritarian in the US has deep historical roots, many of which are centered in racism. The country cannot be healed by ignoring the cancer of racism. Nor can we mediate a conflict when we can't agree on the basics of the problem, solution, or even objective reality.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lt. Michael Byrd did more than he knows. I was at the Capitol Insurrection observing on the east (non-mall) side and witnessed the difference his actions made. Shooting Ashli Babbitt stopped another wave of violent insurrectionists from entering the Capitol.
Just before Lt. Byrd shot Babbitt, insurrectionists inside the Capitol had managed to open a door on the House side. At the time, the crowd on east side was almost all on the center stairs, having no luck trying to (re)break into the doors that led into the Rotunda.
With few people on the House stairs, the insurrectionists who had opened the door started shouting, "Door on the House side is open! Come on over!" But the crowd didn't move. I don't think many of them knew which was the House side.
Six months ago I witnessed the Capitol Insurrection firsthand and reported the open embrace of authoritarianism--not just by the hardcore extremists who stormed the building--but also by the crowd outside who called themselves "Patriots" and said this was "Our 1776." 1/6
Hearing a diverse mass of ordinary looking, middle-class white people discussing violence in calm, matter-of-fact tones was more chilling than the organized militias and proud white supremacists because it revealed authoritarianism's grip on a large minority of the US. 2/6
Since 1/6 that grip has tightened and spread. Republican leaders who condemned both the Insurrection and Donald Trump have nearly all backtracked. They blocked impeachment and then a bipartisan investigation into 1/6. Now they increasingly deny the Insurrection even happened. 3/6
A thread on Rush Limbaugh and a wildly inaccurate zombie essay on the Declaration of Independence he claimed his father wrote. Although Rush is gone, I have no doubt this viral essay about the alleged sacrifices by the Declaration Signers will endure. 1/13
This essay symbolizes much of what Rush Limbaugh came to represent: lies, exaggerations, a patriotism based on idealized and phony representations of the past, and a veneration of the wealthy and powerful whose financial plunder he recast as sacrifice. 2/13
The essay, "Our Lives, Our Fortunes, Our Sacred Honor," offers a GREATLY exaggerated account of the Signers' sacrifices. It is so inaccurate that nearly every claim in it contains some misleading statement, mistruth, or made-up "fact." 3/13 rushlimbaugh.com/my-fathers-spe…
George Mason (VA) at the Constitutional Convention:
"No point is of more importance than that the right of impeachment should be continued. Shall any man be above Justice? Above all shall that man be above it, who can commit the most extensive injustice?"
Gouverneur Morris (PA) noted that the President "can do no criminal act without Coadjutors who may be
punished."
George Mason (VA) added, "When great crimes were
committed he was for punishing the principal as well as the Coadjutors."
And by punishment they mean impeachment.
Elbridge Gerry (MA) on Impeachment at the Constitutional Convention:
"A good magistrate will not fear them. A bad one ought to be kept in fear of them. He hoped the maxim would never be adopted here that the chief Magistrate could do no wrong."
Dear Insurgents:
You aren't the 1776 Patriots who overthrew British rule.
You're the misguided "Whiskey Rebels" of 1794, who believed they could go to war against their government because "the people" would rise and join them.
They were wrong. And so are you. 1/5
The 1794 Insurgents called for “open resistance” believing they could "easily defeat" any army sent against them because the soldiers "will turn" and join the insurgency. Leaders said, “the militia will not come against us and if formed will come and be in our favour.” 2/5
They were wrong. The insurgency melted away when George Washington and Alexander Hamilton personally mounted up and led a 12,000-man army composed of federalized militia through Pennsylvania, the heart of the insurgency. 3/5
We witnessed clear evidence of sophisticated coordination on the back of the Capitol. Leaders used bullhorns and speaker systems to try to stoke the crowd and direct their movements and actions. 1/4
Rioters on the back of the Capitol had a Dewalt Bluetooth speaker (h/t @kaysirota) that periodically blared Trump speeches. It's strapped to the hip of the man at the top of the stairs in this photo by @housewifeangst. He also appears to have a laminated ID around his neck. 2/4
At first the crowd was on the center stairs. Leaders tried to move them to the stairs to the House Chamber. An amplified voice said a door was open and summoned the crowd. Few people moved. Then speaker guy played a Trump speech trying to lead them over like the Pied Piper. 3/4