A typically stupid statement by Scott Adams. PF would never be able prove they’re *not* feds to his satisfaction; any evidence to the contrary would be spun by this loon as part an even deeper conspiracy.
That said, reactions like this, which are widespread, seem to reveal something important about where Alt-Right activism and “optics” have ended up in 2022.
PF is attending a mainstream pro-life rally while wearing masks—surrounded by people showing their faces. They carry shields, even though Antifa isn’t attacking anyone. They’re uninvited guests, or a protection squad that the organizers don’t need or want.
PF’s slogans are vague and anodyne (“Reclaim America!” and “Strong Families!”). These are slightly edgier versions of conservatives’ slogans. If you ask them if they’re “Nazis,” they’d deny it, w/ justification. Are they “Alt-Right”? They probably have a convoluted response.
The problem is, the exact people PF is trying to appeal to are convinced that they’re either “Nazis” or “feds.” The larger the PF gathering, the more threatened and convinced of malfeasance the conservatives become.
What is PF? What do they want? What are they against? What are they protesting exactly? Why the secrecy? It’s all rather vague. Devoid of content, PF activism mostly resembles performance art. This invites conspiracy theories and inflated responses.
If one wanted to pursue “optics,” then why not just BE A CONSERVATIVE. No mask necessary, no threat of doxxing, no unfounded accusations. If PF members resonate with the pro-life cause, then why cause tension and inevitably get misrepresented or attacked?
The “conservative movement” has a long history of identifying and persecuting sincere White Nationalists—as long as its history of race baiting.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is no evidence, and no reason to believe, that Patriot Front are "feds," in the sense that they are government agents on a mission to "make conservatives look bad," provoke another J6, or whatever it is they're being accused of.
Conservatives making the "fed accusation" are acting in bad faith, and I bristle at this, as someone who's been called a "fed" by various right-wing figures, with no evidence offered or required.
Whatever your opinion might be of Patriot Front—mine is mixed and ambivalent—there is no question that they demonstrated organizational ability and group discipline and cohesion in what was, on the whole, a successful event.
One of the most fascinating and unappreciated ideas in Frank Herbert’s *Dune* is the “Missionaria Protectiva.” This is, essentially, a myth or (self-fulfilling) prophecy that the Bene Gesserit Sisterhood plants in cultures throughout the galaxy.
These myths might “brew” for centuries, influencing cultures and peoples, before coming to fruition and serving the Bene Gesserit Sisterhood and their vision of the future. It is a “protective” mission, after all.
“Gesserit” sounds a lot like “Jesuit,” of course—and there is strong Roman Catholic costuming for the Imperium in Villeneuve’s version—but “Gesserit” has stronger commonalities with Judaism.
I loved #NoTimeToDie. The best Bond film in more than a decade—and a Bond film to end all Bond films, in more ways than one.
Cary Fukunaga, the director of the 1st season of *True Detective*, is a genius. I don't think anyone else could have deepen, maybe even redeemed, the Craig era, which had become played out, tired, and morose of late.
Many middle-aged Fleming and Bond fans, like myself, often ask, "Why can't they just make a normal Bond film!? What we mean is, "Why can't we see a self-confident, campy romp from the Roger Moore era?"
New version of Jewish-Catholic Conservatism just dropped. No doubt, this one will be even more successful than 1.0.
I don’t say this to express any WASP resentment—that we’ve been barred from the conservative club, and have been for 70 years. Though I’m sure there’s a little bit of that…
One of the most important trends in the history of postwar “Conservatism” is the rise of Catholic intellectuals—Buckley being paradigmatic—herding a White Protestant voting base (“Religious Right”).
I published this at Radix in 2012, sparked by National Review's firing of John Derbyshire. All of the main points remain valid. I'm sorry, but if you can't see through conservative race-baiting, then I can't really help you.
In this way, Reeve hints at a basic asymmetry between the American Left and Right—with both, the constituents are to the right of the leadership.
The Left gains support from the public by appearing normal: they care about the trees and the children and are trying to create jobs with benefits and pensions.
This monologue about the “radical” and “racist”—indeed, “eugenicist”—Dems comes in the wake of the Biden admin’s mass deportation of Haitians, Psaki’s statements about title 42, and more. IOW, it’s misdirection and totally disconnected from reality.
The immigration debate is pretty meaningless at this point, in that even the most dramatic restriction efforts would not magically restore 1950s White America or whatever Tucker (secretly) and others (not so secretly) want.
The rhetoric is straight out of the past 25 years of paleo-conservatism, the Alt-Right, RW Twitter, etc. Many might see this as "influence." The truth is, it's hallow—trotted out well after these demographic realities are established, and deployed by race-baiting Fox hucksters.