I found this essay by @espiers to be quite interesting, for the multiple, contradictory matters it raised for me nytimes.com/2022/01/09/opi…
I don't see myself as having exactly the same issues as Spiers or Strong, but I have pulled myself (w the help of many) to a highly unusual place. As @AnwarUhuru I think put it, Black men of my age are more likely to be dead than to have a PhD. I've done it by "striving,"
a word I hear in my head a lot. And I've often wanted to read more about use strivers—those who, across lines of sexuality and race, have somehow managed to claw our way from one class up into another. I think many of us are confused & disoriented when we arrive
bc, as as @espiers puts it so well, "Class resentment is often discussed as if it’s a one-way phenomenon: The lower classes resent the upper classes. But it works in the other direction, too."
You claw up, you feel uncomfortable, and those around you resent you for being there.
One way I've been aware of striving conflict is having students call me professor or doctor. Like many Blackademics, I like to use the title I earned, and sometimes white academics who are the 5th generation of PhD in their family think this is uncouth
The part I found least interesting was that, overall, I've found the critique of Strong's profile largely unnecessary; he's a famous actor, there is no need to defend a mildly critical profile of him.
But I appreciated @espiers raising this class nugget & close reading it
Having worked at the Guardian, the profound (if passive aggressively expressed) class rage of the Brits towards us vulgar "striving" Americans was palpable.
Curiously, I don't think of "strivers" and "careerists" as the same thing. I could be kidding myself, but I do feel like
a striver but I don't feel like a careerist. I've strived to get where I am, but I haven't been very good at being a careerist. Writing abt racism, defending Palestine, fighting with liberals, critiquing media and academia—I could have had a more lucrative career.
But, like good writing can do so well, this essay by @espiers asked interesting questions—of herself, of the media framing of Strong, of class dynamics and of me the reader. I left it thinking abt striving v. career + lower class rage v upper class rage in new ways. Good stuff.
So many people, me included, feel beaten down and depressed. This is bc as we start year 3, we are yet again tasked w the impossible: Carry out difficult, alienating, individual tasks which are doomed to never be enough bc they require a state response that isn’t happening.
So many people feel ashamed to be depressed, like they’re a failure bc they struggle to teach online or they feel privilege guilt for mourning a 3rd birthday w/o their friends.
It’s not you. There’s little any of us can do. It’s the system. And it is ok to feel broken by it.
A friend asked me how to help donate better masks. And it’s not something we can really do beyond a bit of harm reduction. The state needs to produce and distribute masks and tests. It won’t do it, so unless we can force it to, any “charity” will be crumbs. There aren’t enough
I don’t feel like most of us have accepted how bad this is going to make life, nor how many lives it will end. The vaccines are working well at individual protection—but the scale of direct harm & collateral damage of what’s coming is almost as unfathomable as it was preventable.
Vaccines work best at a population level by making them encounter viruses so infrequently, they have fewer chances to breakthrough.
What we have is runaway community spread — like pointing a fire hose at someone wearing a water resistant jacket & expecting them to stay dry.
The good news, such as it is, is that the percent of cases leading to overall hospitalizations and death is much lower than it would have been pre-vaccine; the bad news is that sheer volume is SO MUCH HIGHER than it ever was pre-vaccine—and it's still rising.
1. Extremely proud of our journalism students at Northwestern, and the courage they have to fearlessly report on an institution which has so much power over the grades, housing, food, medical career and futures
SCOOP: Today on MSNBC, Symone Sanders interviews her former boss, VP Kamala Harris, abt the Democrats' plan to win the midterms by doing—nothing!
SCOOP: Today on Fox, former Trump Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders interviews her former boss, former President Donald Trump!
SCOOP: Today on NBC, Jenna Bush Hager interviews the woman who took over the job last held by her mother—First Lady Michelle Obama! today.com/video/watch-mi…
I will never understand how news media can hire people who were working like YESTERDAY to spin the news media, give them the microphone, then turn around and say "Why doesn't the public trust us?"
Symone Sanders announced her departure from the White House a month ago. It is likely she was negotiating her new job at MSNBC while she was working for the people. How is that ethical? Ppl get angry at workers becoming lobbyists right after leaving govt—how is this better?
Yup. Legislators sell their govt expertise off to the highest bidding corporation after short stints in govt. It is BARELY regulated. But I don't think there is any regulation or oversight of spokes ppl leaving for lucrative talking head gigs at all.