From 1992, again on the National Voter Registration Act: "Republicans, who twice in the last year used the threat of a filibuster to block the measure from coming to the floor, say the bill will encourage vote fraud.”
McConnell DID say a lot of good things about the Voting Rights Act — before the Supreme Court gutted it. This was him in 2004, arguing for making DOJ preclearance permanent instead of needing reauthorization
But once the Roberts court gave him cover? McConnell has never once looked back. Instead of defending a law on the books, SCOTUS let him pretend that reauthorizing the VRA would be a -new- federal overreach
And so it goes: McConnell has always seen any shift from the status quo on voting — either through campaign finance reform or making it easier to vote — as a threat to GOP victories. Anything he says on elections should be seen through that lens.
Sinema concluded her remarks by "urging other senators to contact her if they wanted to discuss the issue further.” And I would love to be a fly on the wall for one of those meetings. Or maybe present at one of those meetings. I could make charts.
"Manchin and Sinema need to let legislation live or die by the majority's will. If they truly want bipartisanship to have its day again, they need to be unafraid to let bills come to final votes, even if they find themselves voting with the minority.”
The filibuster is a mistake of the rewritten rules, which deleted the rule for “previous question,” a loophole exploited by the Southern slaveholding class and later the Dixiecrats. That is the history of the filibuster.
The idea that the Senate rules were built around — where the esteemed gentlemen of the Senate will just cordially decide to have a majority vote once debate is naturally exhausted — is not anywhere close to reality
TO REPEAT MYSELF: “We should understand this effort as plastering the veneer of technocracy onto her already shallow version of moderation, where aesthetics are more important than policy.”
When I wrote this I considered the potential that it’d turn out Sinema has PLENTY of specifics and policy ideas! Or that she’d use the technocracy as a cover for caving to leadership’s plans! But no. She still has no idea what she actually wants except “big number get smaller"
New from me: I wrote on the most benignly weird thing that we’ve learned about the Trump era to date — WH staff using the works of Andrew Lloyd Webber to calm down the former president’s rages — and why it makes perfect sense
"Everything is overwrought” in a Webber hit. "If there isn’t a parade of dancing cats following the loosest plot heretofore discovered by man, there’s an entire chandelier crashing on stage, and a legion of exhausted first sopranos strewn in his wake.”
New from me: Kyrsten Sinema, we learned in an Axios article, has a secret weapon in her fight to winnow down Democrats' $3.5 spending plan — spreadsheets
New from me: one thing that ties together the Republican agenda lately is the sheer creativity on display as rules, laws, and norms are bent, twisted, and invented out of whole cloth in the pursuit of power
Meanwhile, Democrats are, well, conservative in how they think about The Rules. And it’s forcing them to fight with one hand tied behind their backs in the face of an onslaught of inventive chaos from the GOP.