Up here at the Statehouse Complex for the latest in a long series of hearings on the SC legislature's proposed Congressional maps.
But first, some background...
The House initially went with a proposal that maintained the lasting racial gerrymander in Jim Clyburn's CD-6, but kept CD-1 -- which has been decided by fewer than two points in the last two elections -- winnable for both parties. postandcourier.com/news/sc-house-…
However, Chairman Jay Jordan said some raised concerns that Beaufort County, in the lowcountry, would be combined with CD-2, represented by Joe Wilson.
That map, released days before Christmas, quickly attracted a lawsuit from the ACLU, which blasted the maps as intentionally discriminatory against Black communities.
Rep. Bernstein has already said she plans to vote against the second map, and has raised questions about the involvement of federal lawmakers and other outside groups in drawing them.
Bernstein asks if there's an opportunity to keep Charleston whole and keep Beaufort Co. together.
But Rep. Newton said the maps may not work, and that the communities of interest in Beaufort more resemble those of greater Charleston than a place like North Charleston.
The ad hoc committee votes to adopt the House alternative plan on party lines. Bamberg absent.
I'll have a full story later, but this is a preliminary meeting. We will have a meeting of the full Judiciary Committee later this afternoon, where they will likely advance the maps.
If you're listening in and are confused, they've voted to amend the Senate redistricting bill to match the House plan, and are now advancing an identical bill from the House side, giving them two vehicles to work with in case one of the bills gets defeated during session.
Judiciary Committee is in. Rep. John Richard King (a Democrat) asks why Black voters in N. Charleston are being lumped in with Black voters in Columbia, but those in Beaufort Co. are being kept with Lowcountry voters in Charleston rather than with red districts in the Midlands.
Said that this map is partisan, being advanced only because of the R's majority in the statehouse.
"That is a slap in the face of South Carolinians if you think they are so dog gone stupid to not realize what is happening today," he said.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Waiting for the start of a meeting of the SC House Ways and Means Committee, which is taking up legislation to bar private employers from enforcing vaccine mandates.
The bill was strongly condemned by the state's business community in a statement yesterday.
Hearing has started after a 26 minute delay. Tuesday's subcommittee amendment has been adopted by Ways and Means on party lines.
Under an additional amendment now being discussed, non-employee vendors will also be covered.
Workers fired for not being vaccinated would also have the ability to seek compensation for their court costs, legal fees -- similar to the state's worker's compensation statutes.
A poll released yesterday by Las Vegas pollster SoCo Strategies shows @TomRiceSC7 and @GrahamAllen_1 virtually tied about a half-year out from the Republican primaries.
It's a race seen largely as a referendum on Rice's vote to impeach President Donald Trump.
Details 🧵
The pollster's findings note that Rice's favorables are below 20% for an incumbent. And they drop to 15% after voters are asked if they're aware he voted to impeach.
Interestingly, Allen has lower name recognition than candidates like @RussellWFry (who polled in single digits).
However, VERY early. 40% of voters are undecided. Of those who have decided, Tom Rice holds a 2-point lead over Allen.
Fry, a member of the SC House, also does better here, at 15%. But 70% stated they would refuse to vote for Rice. 30% would change their vote if Trump endorsed.
per @AGAlanWilson's office, a federal judge in Georgia ruled to block vaccine requirement for federal contractors.
The case was brought by Wilson and Governor McMaster, along with AGs in several other states.
@AGAlanWilson This is the third such ruling by a federal judge. For background, the executive branch in South Carolina has pushed back against the feds quite transparently on this.
Mandates have also been a conversation at the statehouse. Activists pushed for lawmakers to take on preemptive action against the feds. postandcourier.com/politics/with-…
And in Ways & Means today, members will discuss outlawing the acceptance of federal funds to enforce federal mandates.
Another anti-Biden vaccine mandate rally planned at the statehouse this Saturday.
This comes almost one month to the day of a similar rally on the Capitol steps that drew roughly 400 people, according to organizers.
Rep. Stewart Jones spoke at the last one. He posted this yesterday saying a small group of lawmakers are pushing for an emergency session to apparently preempt the federal orders.
Other states are looking at something similar, I know Wyoming is, while TN and KY already have.
Arkansas did back in August, and Connecticut's governor called for one as well, albeit on the opposite side of the issue. Interesting times.