Ghislaine Maxwell WON'T face a separate perjury trial, if she loses her post-trial motions.
Feds say avoiding a separate trial on the false statement counts advances "victims' significant interests in bringing closure to this matter" and avoid trauma of more testimony.
Background:
Jurors only heard the first six of the eight counts of Maxwell's indictment.
The last two involved allegations that Maxwell lied on depositions in her civil litigation with Virginia Giuffre Roberts.
Those counts wouldn't have moved the needle on sentencing.
Maxwell had succeeded in severing the last two counts from her trial in a pre-trial motion.
This wrinkle was anticipated—and confirmed in a letter about scheduling for sentencing, which can be read here: documentcloud.org/documents/2117…
Federal prosecutors want to schedule Maxwell's sentencing roughly between three or four months from now.
Maxwell's attorneys want to wait for Judge Nathan to rule on whether there will be a new trial before setting a sentencing date.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In a hearing scheduled to begin shortly, Trump's lawyers will try to dismiss a lawsuit accusing him, Rudy Giuliani, the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers of violating the Ku Klux Klan Act in connection with the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.
As the hearing begins, Trump's lawyer Jesse Binnall claims that the complaints are "full of propaganda meant to achieve a political rather than a legal objective."
Watch the sentencing proceedings for the three men convicted of murdering Ahmaud Arbery embedded in this preview story written by @LawCrimeNews' @AlbertoLuperon.
Billionaire Tom Barrack, the former Trump inaugural committee chair, is back in court for a pre-trial hearing on allegations that he acted as an unregistered agent of the UAE.