I'm not sure if everyone on the left is aware that the controversy about Walensky's comments as they relate to people with disabilities has been followed by a separate controversy on the right about the same comments as they relate to Americans' risk of dying of Covid.
There are a bunch of "the unedited comment changes nothing, she was still devaluing disabled lives!" tweets. That's subjective; people can debate it all they want. But the unedited comment clearly shows that the other controversy is based on a misinterpretation of what she said.
Like, I'm getting a ton of messages like this...even though I'm dealing with an entirely different controversy, about right-wing commentators wrongly depicting Walensky's comments, and not touching the argument that she demeaned disabled people, which is not fact-checkable.
It's always my job to provide context. But anyway: we have two different controversies about the same comments, swirling separately in two separate Twitter bubbles, and I'm addressing one but getting blasted by people assuming I'm addressing the other. Checking replies is fun!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lots of unvaccinated people who’ve died of Covid have also had lots of comorbidities. My point, which has been made by others, is that Walensky’s comments on Good Morning America are being inaccurately described
Biden's sentence: "We're gonna keep at it to ensure the American people are paying their fair share for gas - not being gouged for gas." This rapidly spreading Post Millennial clip cuts out the "gouged" clause to make him sound out of touch or something.
) and others have posted the truncated 12-second clip. The Michigan GOP and Rep. Dan Bishop, among others, then amplified it.
(Postscript: I honestly don't even see how the deceptively truncated quote is being interpreted as Biden saying current gas prices are fair, but the full quote certainly makes it more clear that he isn't saying that.)
Biden made two false claims in this short section of his remarks yesterday on the Virginia election:
It's unusual in recent decades for a VA governor candidate to win with a partymate as president, but far from unprecedented: McAuliffe himself did it in 2013; Republicans did it in 1969 and (with a party-switching former Dem governor) in 1973; lots of Dems did it prior.
(And no, Biden couldn’t have been talking only about sitting governors, since a) he was talking about McAuliffe’s performance; b) more importantly, sitting Virginia governors can’t even run for re-election.)
This viral video is nonsense. It begins with a bonkers claim that the Secretary of Defense sent a text to all active military demanding they get vaccinated by 10 AM the next day. There was no such text. Also, the military's actual vaccination deadlines begin in November.
Important tip: Don't rely on internet stories told by a guy who begins his dramatic story by saying "my dad just let me know this."
Ah, interesting: A week ago, PolitiFact debunked a highly similar nonsense article - with the 10 AM deadline and everything - that was published on a site that pushes false claims under the guise of "humor, parody and satire." politifact.com/factchecks/202…
It's not a "new study," it's from 2011, and it's a study of 37 Nigerians with river blindness who took ivermectin for 11 months. I'm not saying ivermectin is good for Covid; I'm saying people should chill with the Dramatic Social Media Claims about it.
37. The study says they began with 385 people diagnosed with river blindness, but found only 37 of them had sufficiently normal sperm counts to make them eligible for the ivermectin study.
Here’s a statement from a hospital that Oklahoma doctor is affiliated with, supporting his comments about ivermectin use contributing to hospital congestion in the state - though not suggesting, as viral stories did, that ivermectin is a main cause of the backup. (Thread!)
As far as I can tell so far, what happened is the doctor gave an interview to a local outlet in which he cited ivermectin use as one reason some hospitals are congested. The outlet then framed ivermectin use as the main cause of the congestion, which it obviously isn’t. 2/
Then national and international media outlets aggregated the initial, poorly framed local story without themselves doing due diligence to examine the extent to which ivermectin was contributing to the OK hospital congestion. And Maddow and others tweeted out the stories. 3/