@factcheckdotorg archive.md/hMp7x
Unfortunately this is not true. The grant that is being mentioned were one that is already finished at the time of 2016. What that is actually important and actually contain (in the scope) viruses related to SARS-CoV-2 is the grant that is active in
Unfortunately this is not true. The grant that is being mentioned were one that is already finished at the time of 2016. What that is actually important and actually contain (in the scope) viruses related to SARS-CoV-2 is the grant that is active in
@factcheckdotorg archive.md/lEKZQ the beginning of 2019 and continue to 2024. The grant is already active in 2019 since the MERS-like viruses studies in the grant is found already escaping the WIV and lurking inside HZAU.
@factcheckdotorg In fact, sequences from PREDICT-2 (even in China!) were specifically divided into two sets—one of the two sets is explicitly labeled as “not submitted” and only ones intended for submission is sent to EIDITH.
https://twitter.com/engineer2the/status/1480779067309780994
@factcheckdotorg The email also specified that only PREDICT-2 China sequences are to be submitted.
@factcheckdotorg archive.md/2021.09.26-003…
Considering that they sampled the exact same bats in the exact same time and exact same location as RpYN06, RsYN04/05/08 and RaTG15, it is extremely unlikely that they somehow missed every single Sc2r-CoV in these samplings. These “do not publish”
Considering that they sampled the exact same bats in the exact same time and exact same location as RpYN06, RsYN04/05/08 and RaTG15, it is extremely unlikely that they somehow missed every single Sc2r-CoV in these samplings. These “do not publish”
@factcheckdotorg sequences are therefore extremely likely to be Sc2r-CoVs with RdRp that is closer to SARs-CoV-2 than SARS-CoV, that is then censored.
@factcheckdotorg @threadreaderapp Unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
