But laws like 41.18(d), which criminalize being unhoused, don’t lead to more people in housing.
How do I know this? Because we’ve been enacting them for over 100 years in LA — and the situation has only gotten worse. (thread)
As the saying goes, insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
And yet, as last year’s report from the UCLA Luskin Center makes clear, criminalizing homelessnesss has been LA’s primary approach for over a century. luskincenter.history.ucla.edu/2021/02/10/lch…
In the 1880s, as the area that would become Skid Row filled with transient, mostly male laborers, LA responded with a barrage of anti-vagrancy laws, arrests, and forced labor camps.
In the 1910s, the city deemed the many clusters of shanties built by recent immigrants a threat to public health, and demolished or vacated nearly 200 separate locations.
In the 1930s, LA enacted a “work test,” in which unemployment was grounds for being issued a three-day ID card, after which police could arrest those who did not leave the city.
In 1936, the LAPD established an extrajudicial border patrol that deployed 136 officers to 16 major points of entry to California to turn back migrants with “no visible means of support.” latimes.com/archives/la-xp…
In 1940, the city ordered the destruction of all informal encampments, then known as Hoovervilles, across the city.
In 1968, LA first ratified Municipal Code 41.18(d) to outlaw sitting, lying down or sleeping in public rights of way.
In 1987, police and sanitation began dismantling street encampments on Skid Row.
Unhoused residents were displaced, and many ended up in Venice, creating a situation uncanny in its similarity to that which occurred during the pandemic. latimes.com/visuals/photog…
In 1988, LA passed an ordinance banning overnight camping on beaches, and unhoused people were yet again pushed inland.
In the 2000s, the LAPD instituted its “Safer Cities” initiative, which deployed 50 additional police officers to Skid Row to enforce a zero-tolerance policy on crime.
Nearly every decade, arrests have substituted for services and cycling unhoused people through our extensive jail system has taken the place of housing -- costing far more, accomplishing far less.
Nearly every decade, our city’s unhoused population has grown.
As recently as 2014, my colleague @nithyavraman (before she was elected) wrote a report for CAO that indicated that of the ~$100 million our city was spending annually to address homelessness, as much as $87 million was spent on policing unhoused people. latimes.com/local/lanow/la…
Since the passage of Measure HHH in 2016, those numbers have gradually improved, and LA has started to focus on housing and services.
But it’s going to take more than a few years to undo over a century of focusing primarily on enforcement
Many people – including my political opponents – are demanding I support and implement laws that criminalize sitting and lying down in ever larger portions of our city.
But these laws take us backwards, make us less safe, and make homelessness worse.
Unhoused people are disproportionately the *victims* of crime – and no official has the power (or desire) to prevent police from investigating criminal acts.
But statutes like 41.18 criminalize not so much an act as the very *state* of being unhoused. latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/…
People regularly complain that LAPD do not devote sufficient time to investigating property crimes, drug use, and other low-level offenses.
And yet they imagine tasking the department with keeping ~60k people from sitting down in broad swaths of LA will somehow improve this.
At best, an unhoused person on your block might be more easily compelled to move along to the next one.
And someone on a different block will be more easily compelled to move along to yours.
We should not perpetuate a policy that amounts to rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic.
Only more housing and services will make us safer -- and peddling fantasies that criminalization will solve our problems is what’s truly dangerous for our city.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Our Encampments to Homes program busted the myth that people prefer to be homeless.
Outreach can work - with time, trust & real housing resources.
(Thread)
LA’s approach to homelessness fails because it’s often based on false assumptions. One of the worst is that most unhoused people are “service resistant.”
Blaming people for being unhoused disguises the real problem: systemic barriers that keep people from saying yes.
This week Council approved a new “street engagement strategy” for homelessness.
It’s an improvement over the current system, for sure, but it was constructed as a reaction to other policies that assume people need to be coerced into leaving the streets.
In Venice this summer, we showed how transparency, trust, time, partnership, and outreach with *real* housing resources could address homelessness and reduce encampments. Today, in Mar Vista, the city did the exact opposite, disrupting housing efforts and causing harm. thread 1/8
There were about 15 unhoused people, mostly seniors, living in a remote corner of Mar Vista Park. Working with @hollymitchell@lahomeless and community partners, we were on track to find housing for people by an Oct deadline from @lacityparks. 2/8
This morning, rangers forced people out of the park and onto the sidewalks in nearby neighborhoods. We need to know why and how this happened and at whose direction. It was the opposite of the best practices we modeled with Venice Beach Encampments to Homes. 3/8
The LA Times looks at the Venice Beach Encampments to Homes program, which helped 211 people move indoors, and asks: ‘Can’t this happen all over the city’?
The E2H program, a collaboration of agencies and run by @StJosephCtr, was designed as new approach to help our unhoused neighbors quickly and compassionately. It helped bust a pervasive and negative stereotype about homelessness and how to solve it
As the @latimes puts it, our work with Venice Beach Encampments to Homes disproves “the trope that homeless people living on the street are “service resistant.” Even people who professed their love of the view of the ocean from their tents left for brick and mortar housing.”
Residents and visitors to beaches continue to report nausea, headaches and odors from Santa Monica Bay following an emergency discharge last month from Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant of 17 million gallons of raw sewage.
(thread) 1/10
@LACitySAN has agreed to pay for hotels and air conditioning for El Segundo residents impacted by the spill, and I am insisting on the same for LA’s own residents in Playa del Rey.
2/10
Recent beach water quality tests have indicated the water in the Santa Monica Bay is safe for human recreation. All beach advisories for the Westside and South Bay have been lifted because water samples have not exceeded state water quality standards.