Prof Martin Neil Profile picture
Jan 13, 2022 9 tweets 3 min read Read on X
1.We showed ONS England data from November did NOT support vaccine efficacy claims. The ONS’s December report claims anomalies we identified are caused by healthy vaccinee effect.

We examined the new ONS data and found NO evidence to support this claim: dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.… Image
2. The healthy vaccinee effect occurs when people closer to death are too ill to be vaccinated and so become concentrated in a shrinking unvaccinated population, thus increasing the group’s mortality rate.
3. NHS recommended that the most critically ill people be prioritised for vaccination in each age group.

However, the ONS not only contradict NHS guidance but also contradict themselves in their own report: Image
4. If the ONS are right then we would see:

a) The percentage of the unvaccinated in poor health rise as vaccine rollout progresses

b) A steady non-Covid mortality rate among the unhealthy (because they are dying at same rate as they always have done).
5. To support their claim the ONS released the percentage of 70-79 age group with "very poor" health in each vaccination category.

Oddly, the vaccinated population contains a higher percentage of those in very poor health and this increases over time.
6. Surprisingly the unvaccinated population has the LOWEST concentration of the unhealthy and the percentage declines over time. Image
7. In this unhealthy sub-population we found the non-Covid mortality rate for the unvaccinated is HIGHER than for the vaccinated. Both rates should be equivalent

Again, we see unnatural spikes in non-Covid mortality just after vaccine roll out as seen before in whole population Image
8. Therefore, those in poorest health were NOT more likely to remain unvaccinated.

Also, there is a rise in non-Covid mortality, coincidental with vaccine rollout that is not only seen in the population as a whole but is also seen in those with the poorest health.
9. We conclude that healthy vaccine effect cannot explain the anomalies we discovered in the ONS data and believe it is up to advocates for this hypothesis to now prove their case using the released data.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof Martin Neil

Prof Martin Neil Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MartinNeil9

Feb 24
1. Without PCR testing data mortality and morbidity would not be attributable to the novel virus and if this attribution is false there must therefore be other explanations for the ‘pandemic’.

.@Jikkyleaks .@Kevin_McKernan Image
2. Whilst scandals about PCR testing are well known a materially important aspect of PCR testing has been given scant attention and that is cross reactivity (or crosstalk). This is where other viruses, such as common colds or flus etc., trigger a false positive PCR result.
3. We analysed the very few studies that used blind samples of colds or flu viruses to undertake ‘mystery shopper’ testing of laboratories using PCR.

In these studies, we found strong evidence for up to 25% cross reactivity between other competing viruses and the PCR tests.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 3, 2023
1. How did antibiotics use change during the Covid-19 'pandemic'?

And what happened to the stockpiles of antibiotics Fauci said were needed?

In our latest article we pulled together material on policy changes on antibiotic use during the 'pandemic'. Image
2. Antibiotics are essential in a pandemic. This view is motivated by the fact that in his 2008 article in the Journal of Infectious Diseases (which reported on autopsies of well-preserved victims of the Spanish Flu pandemic), Anthony Fauci concluded that: Image
3. Despite this UK NICE guidance NG165, on managing suspected or confirmed pneumonia, explicitly forbade the use of antibiotics in Covid-19 cases: Image
Read 9 tweets
Jun 1, 2023
1. Did flu vanish or was there a failure to search for it?

There has been a collective and systemic failure in flu surveillance and flu death reporting systems in the UK during 2020 and into 2021. Image
2. The UK FluDetector system, which uses machine learning to track flu using Google Trends data, reported that flu disappeared in 2020/21. This is contradicted by Google’s own data and UKHSA reports, both of which report a clear signal for flu in the UK in 2020/21. Image
3. The UK FluSurvey system tracked flu incidence only until week 20 of 2020 and never updated this data. They then abandoned flu tracking until January 2021 when they announced that the flu season had now restarted, after supposedly witnessing the near eradication of flu. Image
Read 8 tweets
May 11, 2023
"Sensors set to Off"

Did Covid-19 quarantines hide the flu?

Quarantines were sold as measures to reduce spread of SARS-CoV-2 and are claimed to have prevented the spread of flu.

But what if there is another explanation....... Image
1. Flu tests are recommended to be administered within 4 days of symptom onset. If they are administered after 4 days, they would likely produce a false negative result for someone with flu (flu tests are rarely administered routinely anyway).

See:

wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/sensors-set-…
2. Mandatory Covid-19 tests, run at high cycle thresholds and suffering from cross-reactivity with other pathogens (amongst other operational issues), may well have resulted in false positives for Covid-19, when in fact the pathogen causing symptoms may have been flu.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 8, 2023
1. The latest ONS COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness report is out. It claims strenuous efforts were made to account for confounders however for the non-covid mortality they state a BIG caveat:

.@SarahCaul_ONS
2. This isn't mere 'residual confounding'. In previous reports the ONS claimed a healthy vaccinee effect. Despite their efforts this HUGE confounding bias remains, and they plainly don't care.

This means none of the claims made by the ONS for vaccine effectiveness can be trusted
3. Also, if you look at the reduction in non-covid deaths you can see there is an increased mortality risk for the 'First dose: after three months' cohort.

The ONS doesn't give any explanation.

Why are people dying more frequently after their first jabs?
Read 4 tweets
Dec 3, 2021
1.Our research team have now analysed the ONS England November mortality data. We conclude that despite seeming evidence to support vaccine effectiveness this conclusion is doubtful because of a range of serious inconsistencies and anomalies.

See: https://t.co/PIkA4fVxBHdx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.…
Image
2.The data appear to show lower non-Covid mortality for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Odd. Also unvaccinated mortality rates peak at the same time as the vaccine rollout peaks for the age group, then falls and closes in on the vaccinated. This is not natural Image
3. Consider what we are witnessing here. We have a vaccine whose recipients are suffering fewer non-covid deaths and hence are benefitting from improved mortality. And the mortality rates look to differ significantly from historical norms, as evidenced in mortality lifetables.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(