The US Supreme Court has blocked Biden's vaccine mandate for private businesses. Although this is excellent news, it seems obvious that the admin always knew this would be the outcome.…
The real goal of the "mandate" fearmongering was to intimidate people into getting the 💉.

Unfortunately, many people probably got the 💉 out of fear that their jobs and businesses might be threatened, when they otherwise would not have. Those people can't un-💉 themselves.
Biden admin knew all along that their bullsh¡t "mandate" was illegal and would be struck down, but did it anyway to scare people into doing what they wanted.

This is not the behavior of a regime that feels secure and legitimate in its authority.
So apparently, Kavanaugh is the only reason the healthcare worker mandate remained in effect. He sided with the liberal justices. Gorsuch, Alito, Thomas, and Barrett dissented.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with 🔻ɴᴏᴛ ʀᴇᴍɴᴀɴᴛ.

🔻ɴᴏᴛ ʀᴇᴍɴᴀɴᴛ. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @remnantposting

14 Jan
Incredibly short sighted for RWers to dismiss the significance of digital "health pass" infrastructure & "track and trace" tools.

We have seen this movie before. Some in online right are too young to remember pre-9/11 & it shows. I don't mean to disrespect. It's just the truth.
Reading about the pre-9/11 world in books and articles doesn't do it justice. It's a "you had to be there" kind of thing. The event was clearly exploited to deepen and broaden the reach of the security state. Same happened with C_VID.

Agamben was right on "state of exception."
The institutions have successfully normalized yet another imposition upon daily participation in society. No, it does not matter that it's not happening everywhere—the implications of major economic centers of the US & various Western countries adopting this are huge.
Read 11 tweets
13 Jan
All this rah rah rah, Populism™, "post-Trumpism" stuff is just covert smuggling of the same old neo-con bullsh¡t into a new coat of paint.

Regime scribes capitalize on the pseudo-radical branding of Neo-Con 3.0 by "yes, and"-ing that characterization for fearmongering purposes.
You see this with people like Poso acting like they're so transgressive for opposing the sabre-rattling about "Russian Aggression"—Poso turns around and sabre-rattles about the Ghinese Gommunist Bardy :DDDD
Interesting article about this. @hpmacd refers to this fake transgression as a cover for "Zombie Reaganism."…
Read 5 tweets
13 Jan
What threshold of evidence would we need to meet for these people to admit that the 💉 doesn't work? You really have to wonder.
Read 14 tweets
13 Jan
yOu dO rEaLiZe
What TV show did this performative smug bullsh¡t originate from? I have to know.

And don't make me tap the sign. Every 💉 vs un-💉stat is dishonest on this basis:……
I am so sick of 💉 vs un-💉 claims—they are basically disinformation without noting the above changes to definitions and testing methods. I almost wish I didn't know this, because then it wouldn't be so maddening to hear people spout bullsh¡t data they don't understand.
It was always true all along that nearly everyone dying "with C_VID" had multiple comorbidities. The CDC website names an average of 4.0 comorbidities, RIGHT NOW, and says nothing about whether they were 💉 or not. Because that's irrelevant.…
Read 5 tweets
13 Jan
It's really simple guys:
1. Have some means for identifying friend or foe
2. Show of force, get message out
3. Disregard and eject anybody encouraging your guys to engage in criminally-actionable behavior, put their hands on people, instigate, etc.

Fed paranoia doesn't help
If they want your group or members of your group to implicate themselves in something bad, feel free to call them a Fed.

Somebody trying to spur a show of force or broadcast a message is not automatically a Fed
Feds want you to do bad sh¡t so they can make an example out of you/your guys.

If someone's not trying to make that happen, there's no reason to accuse them of being a Fed. This is loony paranoia. And that's coming from me, a schizoposter.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!