Focusing on the daily swings might lead you to miss the forest for the trees, but we are still firmly in the secular Quadrant 1 here.
Vol has increased though, which means we are going to temporarily swing through Quadrant 4 and 3 at times.
1/7
The pace of growth of credit injection through the real economy has stalled to very low levels since mid-21.
This implies a weaker impulse to real growth and earnings until at least summer 2022...
2/7
...and a repricing down of inflation expectations too: basically, a still-okaysh nominal growth but on a clearly decelerating trend.
Lower inflation break-evens while the Fed embarks in a tightening exercise lead to higher front-end real interest rates, but...
3/7
...I still argue policy is net-net at an easy level, making my base case the secular Quadrant 1 and not the scary Quadrant 4: why?
Because
A) 5y forward 5y real yields are still 70 bps below equilibrium levels
B) The Fed will implement QT in a pretty soft fashion in '22
4/7
Tomorrow I will post a separate thread on what a ''soft QT'' looks like, but it's important to know the pace of monetary tightening is the key determinant rather than the tightening itself
Temporary episodes of risk-off (Quad4) and optimism (Quad3) will be frequent though
5/7
The best tactical risk-reward trades here remain to buy long-end bonds (outright, or better against short-end bonds) on sell-offs and fade outsized ''the economy is booming and long-end nominal yields to the roof'' proxy trades.
If you like my macro insights and you're not subscribed yet to my free macro newsletter The Macro Compass, you're missing out on my best macro pieces and investment ideas.
Ever wondered what's like to launch a macro hedge fund these days?
Here are the 7 key insights I got so far:
1/
A) If you think it will be hard, you are wrong: it will be harder
In the early steps of launching a hedge fund you are required to be the CEO, CIO, COO, head of investor relations, and so on.
It's really hard work.
2/
B) The package matters
Investors have upped their regulatory/infra requirements, and they understandbly demand you to be fully regulated/compliant/audited and have a solid trading infrastructure with a strong prime broker.
3/
The new theory is that Fed hikes are actually stimulative (?!) for the economy at this stage.
Let's take a look into it.
Thread.
1/
Higher interest rates generally slow down economic activity: corporates and households face higher debt servicing costs and therefore they must cut capex/hiring/spending to allocate more resources to debt servicing.
Lower spending = the economy slows down.
2/
In other words: higher rates tend to negatively affect the liability side of private sector balance sheets.
But what if this time that’s going to take much longer, and in the meantime the opposite is happening?
The Fed hiked rates above 5%, and yet the US economy doesn't break.
Here is why.
Thread.
1/
High interest rates are supposed to break something because an overly indebted economy will have to service a mountain of debt at expensive rates and it will have less money for income and spending.
The problem is that people are looking at the ''wrong'' debt.
2/
Private sector debt levels and trends are by far more important than governmment debt
Contraty to the government, the private sector doesn't have the luxury to print money: if you get indebted to your eyeballs and you lose your ability to generate income, the pain is real
3/