People who want to keep the filibuster to kill the bill think the same as her, not differently.
It’s those who want to remove the filibuster in order to safeguard our democracy who think differently from her.
Where are her attempts to understand them?
It’s those who want to remove the filibuster in order to safeguard our democracy who think differently from her.
Where are her attempts to understand them?
https://twitter.com/ryanstruyk/status/1481680128929415168
Comfortable people discomfited by injustice are always asked to “understand different perspectives,” and it never ever means the people who are actually harmed by injustice, who have an actually different perspective. It always means those who are comfortable with injustice.
Yes, and what do we mean when we say “we’ve never been so polarized,” anyway?
What if instead we said “It’s been a long time since the reality of injustice has been made so unavoidably present to otherwise comfortable people”?
getrevue.co/profile/julius…
What if instead we said “It’s been a long time since the reality of injustice has been made so unavoidably present to otherwise comfortable people”?
getrevue.co/profile/julius…
Whenever you “agree to disagree” with somebody on matters of justice that don’t affect you personally, whenever you decide to stop paying attention because it’s too hard or divisive, somebody you’re erasing from your equation who will not be permitted to opt out in the same way.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
