Christian Lamar Profile picture
Jan 14, 2022 13 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Here are a few highlights below of the US Supreme Court landmark ruling, striking down the Biden mandate against 84 million US workers. Biden’s future plan was to apply the unconstitutional “get vaccinated” mandate against every American worker in the USA. ChristianforArizona.com
“ This Court is not a public health authority. But it is charged with resolving disputes about which au- thorities possess the power to make the laws that govern us under the Constitution and the laws of the land. “
“ Employer must verify vaccination status of each employee & maintain proof of it….mandate does contain an ‘exception’ for employers that require unvaccinated workers to ‘undergo [weekly] testing & wear a face covering’ But employers are not required to offer this option, …”
“ And employers who commit violations face hefty fines: up to $13,653 for a standard violation, and up to $136,532 for a willful one. 29 CFR §1903.15(d) (2021) “
“ Not only must the federal government properly invoke a constitutionally enumerated source of authority to regulate in this area or any other. It must also act consistently with the Constitution’s separation of powers. “
“ Sometimes lawmakers may be tempted to delegate power to agencies to ‘reduc[e] the degree to which they will be held accounta- ble for unpopular actions.’ R. Cass, Delegation Reconsid- ered: A Delegation Doctrine for the Modern But the Constitution imposes some boundaries here “
“ Sometimes lawmakers may be tempted to delegate power to agencies to ‘reduc[e] the degree to which they will be held accounta- ble for unpopular actions.’ (R. Cass, Delegation Reconsidered: A Delegation Doctrine) But the Constitution imposes some boundaries here. “
“ On the other hand, if the statutory subsection the agency cites really did endow OSHA with the power it as- serts, that law would likely constitute an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority. “
“ Under OSHA’s reading, the law would afford it almost unlimited discretion—and certainly impose no “specific restrictions” that “meaning- fully constrai[n]” the agency. Touby v. United States, 500 U. S. 160, 166–167 (1991). “
“ OSHA would become little more than a ‘roving commission to inquire into evils and upon discovery correct them.’ A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U. S. 495, 551 (1935) (Cardozo, J., con- curring). “
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
_________________
Nos. 21A244 and 21A247

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, ET AL., APPLICANTS
21A244 v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY
AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, ET AL.
[January 13, 2022]

supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf…
“ the agency (OSHA) is soliciting public comment and seeking additional information to assess the ability of smaller employers to do so in the rulemaking commenced by this ETS. OSHA will determine the issue on the basis of the record, after receiving public comment. “
COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard

86 FR 61402
Page:
61402-61555 (154 pages)
CFR:
29 CFR 1910
29 CFR 1915
29 CFR 1917
29 CFR 1918
29 CFR 1926
29 CFR 1928

federalregister.gov/documents/2021…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Christian Lamar

Christian Lamar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @christianllamar

Jul 12, 2023
Republican AZ Precinct Committeeman:
The Power of Censure & Public Interest. How you can use Censures to save your country?

By Christian Lamar
AZGOP Executive Committee Member-at-Large (CD8)(LD2)
State Committeeman & Precinct Committeeman

christianforarizona.com/wp-content/upl…
Introduction of Presentation
• What is a Precinct Committeemen?
• Where in the law do AZ Precinct Committeemen (PCs) have power?
• Why should PCs use Social Media? What is Public interest?
• What is a Censure? When did Censures start?
• Why are Censures powerful & effective? What can it do?
• What is the process of motioning a Censure?
• Do Censures have to be written? Is a Censure a Motion?
• How can Censures save your country?
• Censure Links & Resources
What is a Precinct Committeeman?
• A Precinct Committeeman (PC) is an elected official in the American political party system.
• A PC holds the political party power. This inherent power (of PC/The People) controls government.
• Precinct Committeemen have power over elected
officials because politicians rely on political party for campaign donations, fundraisers, volunteers to knock doors/make phone calls, rallies, events & speeches. ( Public Interest)
Read 14 tweets
Apr 25, 2023
AZGOP LD2 chair blocked Election Integrity Censure. Our wonderful AZGOP LD2 Precinct Committeemen on April 24, 2023 under PCs authority banned all video/audio recordings of all speeches, discussions, campaigns, candidates, motions or any future Legislative District 2 meetings.
- AZ Precinct Committeemen are publicly elected officers under the Arizona State Constitution, Article 4, Part 2, Section 1 (3)

- AZGOP LD2 Precinct Committeemen voted YES (by simple majority) to ban or prohibit any/all video or audio recordings of all future LD2 meetings.
- Legislative District Meetings under AZGOP bylaws are open to the public, in fact we typically welcome the public to our mtgs for the purpose of Civics 101 engagement & Voter engagement.

- Legislative District Meetings are public mtgs under AZGOP Bylaws unless changed by PCs.
Read 14 tweets
Mar 26, 2022
I was asked “ What does Obergefell have to do w/ transgenders? “
Here are 10 sources below on how legalizing gay marriage allowed transgender identity expansion.
It has caused Parental rights issues, transgender curriculum & Men taking over Women’s sports.
ChristianforArizona.com
June 26, 2015
Slate
How Obergefell Could Help Transgender Rights:
“ Friday’s SCOTUS decision was a huge victory for the rights of gay, lesbian & bisexual folks….But it may also be a big win for the rights of transgender individuals & their loved ones. “
slate.com/human-interest…
July 16, 2015
What Marriage Equality Means for Transgender Rights:
“ Obergefell is a victory for the transgender community..Advocates at Transgender Law Center say such liberties should extend beyond same-sex marriage to the right to change the gender “
nytimes.com/2015/07/16/opi…
Read 11 tweets
Aug 10, 2021
Introduced by Christian Lamar, Precinct Committeeman in Maricopa County: A 2nd Resolution of Legislative District 20 to censure AZ State Senator Paul Boyer passed 43-10. Thanks to the GREAT PEOPLE of LD20 for standing w/ me fighting for election integrity!
A Resolution to censure AZ State Senator Paul Boyer in LD20 AZGOP.

Be it resolved by the body of the AZ Republican Committee of Legislative District 20:

1. Paul Boyer is a Republican Arizona State Senator who is refusing to uphold his
oath of office in A.R.S 38-231.
2. Paul Boyer is refusing to defend the laws of the State of Arizona and the
Constitution of the United States.
Read 21 tweets
Feb 9, 2021
A Resolution to censure AZ State Senator Paul Boyer in Legislative District 20 Republican Committee of AZGOP was Unanimously passed tonight. Introduced by Christian Lamar, Registered Republican Voter in LD20 of Maricopa County. I thank the great people of LD20 for swift action!
" Be it resolved by the body of the AZ Republican Committee of Legislative District 20:
1.Paul Boyer is a Republican Arizona State Senator who is refusing to uphold his oath of office in A.R.S 38-231. "
" 2. Paul Boyer is refusing to defend the laws of the State of Arizona and the Constitution of the United States. "
Read 16 tweets
Jan 26, 2021
2nd Impeachment trial against Donald Trump is even more Unconstitutional than the 1st. Article 1 Sec 3 Clause 6 says “ When the President of the United States is tried the Chief Justice shall preside. “ Trump cant be tried as a US citizen & a US Senator cannot preside over trial!
Article 1 Section 3 Clause 6 of the Constitution of the United States

constitution.congress.gov/browse/article…
The 1st impeachment against President Trump (if you remember) didn’t include valid crimes in the criminal code. The Dems literally subjectively manufactured what Dems believed to be crimes in their view rendering both of their articles from House Democrats invalid on its face.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(