It's Friday, so let's Learn about Extremism! Today I want to tell you a little about one of the many women who played important roles on the far right in the United States.
I present to you Mary Lyrl Van Hyning (1892-1973), who was a prominent far right activist from the 1930s
through the 1950s, as the editor of an antisemitic and conspiratorial publication, Women's Voice, as a publisher and distributor of a variety of right-wing tracts, and as a speaker and conference organizer.
She also could rock a hat.
Van Hyning got her start with the isolationist Mother's Movement in the years before World War II. She and other far right women in Chicago formed the group known as "We, the Mothers, Mobilize for America, Inc."
In early 1941, Van Hyning began what would be a 20 year career of
editing and publishing Women's Voice, the main outlet for her extremism and antisemitism. It wasn't particularly subtle in its message.
She hated Jews and Freemasons the most (linking them together), and of course hated Communists. She was also anti-Catholic but was not so explicit about it. The Jews were the real problem.
Here in one typical issue, two of her lead articles were about the United Nations being Jewish and promoting fake antisemitic quotes from Benjamin Franklin.
One source alleges WV had a circulation of around 3,000, but its reach may have been broader, because in addition to
subscribing, many supporters bought additional copies to pass out or send to other people. In addition to newspaper, she also published stand-alone pamphlets, like this one.
Here's a little article in one issue calling for Congress to "OUTLAW all minority groups, or place them under close supervision and control" as well as to investigate Jewish control of the government behind the scenes.
Her publication was filled with little snippets of antisemitism, like this one from a Swedish man asserting that "the whole world" is crying "away with the Jews." This just after World War II when "away with the Jews" nearly became a thing.
Other works were also advertised, like those of Ayn Rand.
Here's some of the literature she sold, including pieces by Austin App, one of the earliest Holocaust deniers, and an item by Rose Wilder Lane, daughter of Laura Ingalls Wilder, author of the "Little House on the Prairie" books.
This list from a later issue includes numerous works by George W. Armstrong--subject of a recent thread I made, cousin to this one.
Throughout the 1940s and 1950s, FBI offices around the country were sent letters warnings them about Van Hyning and her extremism, often accompanied by an issue of WV that they had encountered or that someone had put on their doorsteps. It
She eventually amassed an FBI file hundreds of pages long, though I don't think it ever investigated her for a crime.
Among other things, Van Hyning was also anti-vax, being a vocal opponent of the polio vaccine. "Jews Poison American Children" was the title of one of her anti-vaccine pamphlets.
During World War II, her daughter ran unsuccessfully for public office. After World War II, her son ran--also unsuccessfully--on an extreme platform. Here's a promotion for him in Women's Voice.
The Chicago office of the ADL kept close tabs on her because of her poisonous antisemitism and sometimes warned the FBI about her. Here ADL documented the increasing role noted antsemite Eustace Mullins was playing in the late 1950s.
In addition to her publications, Van Hyning spoke around the country and also organized her own conferences and events.
In 1960, Van Hyning's husband died. In her late 60s, she decided to move to New Mexico to be with other family, and this basically ended her activism. She died in 1973 of breast cancer, leaving behind a decades-long legacy of hate, prejudice and extremism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's see how antisemitic Twitter is doing right now. I know; I'll search on the recent uses of the term "Holohoax," a Holocaust denial expression meant, as you no doubt figured out, to characterize the Holocaust as a hoax.
Hmmm. Quite a references. Let's look at a few.
Here's a typical one, making essentially highly qualified claims ("soldiers") to assert falsehoods. Others found plenty of documentation. Note as well their explanation for the Holocaust denial laws that some countries have.
This post, from an hour ago, is similar, asserting things (like there were no gas chambers killing people) for which there is an incredible abundance of evidence.
Gather round, people, while this thread tells you of the George Santos of the mountains of West Virginia, a man named Joseph De Soto, recently elected to the WV state legislature, and who was just arrested for threatening to kill other members of that body.
This past year, De Soto--a recent arrival to West Virginia--ran for a seat in the state house. He beat the incumbent in the GOP primary. Unfortunately, not a single Democrat ran against him; his only opponent was from the tiny right-wing extremist Constitution Party. De Soto won.
De Soto boasted, though, a sterling resume--he was a "physician-scientist," biblical scholar, conservative writer, and former U.S. Army combat medic. He had three doctorates, including medicine, pharmacology, and "national security."
The sovereign citizen movement emerged in Wyoming in the 1980s. By the mid-1980s, sovereign citizens were printing their various notices and declarations in the classified sections of Wyoming newspapers.
Here's (part of) a 1985 declaration by sovereign citizen Murray Watson claiming that he has signed no contracts that would put him under the jurisdiction of admiralty law (a common sovcit belief is that a conspiracy replaced the common law with admiralty/maritime law).
A couple of months later, John Allemand Jr. published a similar document. Here's a segment:
This is a little thread about the benefits of phraseology searching when monitoring/conducting research on extremism, whether you are a scholar, journalist, activist or something else.
My example is from the sovereign citizen movement, which is peculiarly susceptible to this
methodology (as you'll see), but it is broadly applicable for many different types of extremism, though much less useful for movements, such as the boogaloo movement, that tend to communicate primarily in memes.
I'm going to start with something I found in an old newspaper. My original research question was basically, "When did sovereign citizens first start using the phrase 'threat, duress and coercion' in their documents or on other documents, such as when signing a driver's license?"
This is a thread that seems as if it is about one person, but there's a TWIST, and it's actually about another person, and about how the influential extremists are not always the ones you read about on the news or hear about on social media.
Ready?
Last night I thought about making a post about the first prominent white supremacist I met face to face. After some thinking, I realized it was probably Nord Davis, a Christian Identity adherent from North Carolina. I saw him at an event in Ohio in 1996 not long before his death.
Davis's greatest notoriety probably came after his death, as it was revealed that he'd had ties to the family of 1996 Atlanta Olympics bomber Eric Rudolph. Here's Nord in the early 1970s, when he was running for office on the far right American Party ticket.
I'm in procrastination mode today, so let's talk about sovereign citizen license plates, an always interesting subject. I've made hundreds of posts about sovcit license plates, so why not a few more?
Specifically, I want to talk about their origins and early use!
The sovereign citizen fixation with license plates pre-dates the movement itself (which began to cohere in the late 1970s). It starts with its parents: the tax protest movement and the Posse Comitatus. Anti-gov't extremists really did not like having to have (& pay for) plates.
Some simply wouldn't use them. Here is tax protest guru Vaughn Ellsworth arguing for this tactic in 1975.