I've contemplated this thread for a while b/c 1) it'll be long & 2) it'll be personal. TLDR; I had a foray with the medical health establishment in my 20s that attuned me to the fact that those within it often don't care about quality of life, but only about preventing death 1/
from whatever the doctor in question treats. I believe that this experience was one of the major factors that primed me to reject covid hysteria.
Here goes: I discovered in my late 20's that I had the BRCA 2 mutation, although my family's history of breast cancer was limited 2/
Estimating my lifetime risk of BC to be ~ 60%, the doctors advised me to have children and get prophylactic surgery ASAP. This was not what I wanted to do with my life. I did a deep dive into the literature, & learned that many scientists actually questioned these statistics &
whether the BRCA/BC link is causative, or rather correlative to an extent. Some believe that the interplay is much more complex, and other genes are involved. Therefore, someone like me who doesn't have a strong family history of BC might have a much lower risk than estimated 3/
I presented the doctors with the research, but they weren't interested (nor were they familiar with it). They simply told me that the "safe" thing to do was to follow their instructions. It was beyond evident that they didn't care about my quality of life, or my well-being -4/
apart from me not dying of breast cancer, for which presumably they would be blamed. I was dismayed by their lack of interest, unwillingness to question their assumptions and biases, and lack of consideration for my cost-benefit analysis. I was also stunned that 5/
I, a 20-something year old law student, had read studies bearing on their area of supposed expertise that they had not bothered to consider. I reached out to some of the doctors/scientists who questioned the prevailing wisdom surrounding BRCA mutations, & they conveyed that 6/
they had been silenced and ostracized by their peers. I don't think I need to connect the dots here: this experience bears a striking resemblance to the COVID approach & may have been responsible for my early rejection of the myopic focus on prevention of a single disease 7/7
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I remember vividly reading this article nearly 2 years ago, in which CDC official Nancy Messonier told Americans to prepare for "significant disruption" in their lives. My first thought was "no." After conducting some research, I became more dubious 1/ npr.org/sections/healt…
as I learned that "significant disruption" was actually NOT how public health officials previously advised managing pandemics. The skepticism intensified when I saw Sweden take a different approach, and read an article in The NY Times in March 2020 by David Katz arguing that 2/
shutting society down would cause more harm than covid. But no one around me agreed, and it quickly became evident that one was not allowed to have a different opinion on the subject - I was dismissed, ostracized, and attacked personally for expressing my views. 3/
This man wrote me an email (at 4am!) to accuse me of harming people by writing things he disagrees with. A few notes Dr. Quickel: 1) ideas don’t cause harm, and in fact a free exchange of different ideas is part of a robust and healthy society; 2/
Your assertion that public health trumps civil liberties is just that; and 3) you’ve failed to engage with any of the ideas, including the legal arguments or those about the exceedingly low risk that children face from covid, or that we’ve never mandated new EUA vaccines. 2/2
And finally, be careful what you write to a stranger in the middle of the night, as she might have a Twitter account with 40K followers. 3/3
nytimes.com/live/2021/11/1…
The New York Times shamelessly lies about the risk COVID poses to young children to try to shame McConaughey for questioning vaccine mandates for 5-11 year olds. 94 children in that age group have died, the majority w/underlying conditions. 1/
comparisons between existing school mandates and prospective covid vaccine mandates are inapposite. We've never mandated vaccines for children that haven't been tested for years. Never mandated EUA vaccines for ANYONE. 2/2
sorry this is actually a slight misstatement. EUA products have been mandated for the military, b/c there's a specific provision permitted the President to waive informed consent requirement for military members.
theatlantic.com/health/archive…
"My nonbinary 8-year-old was so mad & maybe so scared that they could barely look at me." This is an actual sentence. In an article in one of the most ostensibly esteemed publications in the country. The educated elite in this country have lost their minds
and by "their minds" I'm using plural, not nonbinary terms
I am aware that by critiquing some of these practices I am opening myself up to a whole new slew of hate. I'm ready for it! I got a lot of practice the past year.
I'm going to write one thread about the v@x thing and then I never want to tweet about it again. Unfortunately I cannot cover this quickly. A primary driving force behind my decision was the realization that not being vaxxed was causing me far more stress than it was worth 1/
I didn't want to make this a political issue. It is a health issue, and I've always maintained that for many people, getting the vaccine is a wise choice. In that vein, I believe it was reasonable to assess my health as a whole - including emotional - & conclude that holding 2/
out was simply no longer worth it, on balance. I didn't "cave." I didn't "give in." I made a decision that was sensible in order for me to continue to best perform my job, which at this time primarily consists of legal contests to vaccine mandates & responding to the dozens 3/