Do I have any Twitter followers who haven't yet signed up for @cosmo_globalist? Here's why you should: claireberlinski.substack.com
There's a severe crisis in journalism. For a variety of technological, regulatory, and cultural reasons, largely but not entirely related to the rise of the Internet, newspapers are dying. Foreign news coverage, especially, has all but disappeared.
You can read about this here: claireberlinski.substack.com/p/social-media…
The result is that whereas foreign news made up 40 percent of the broadcast news, during the Cold War, now it's less than 4 percent. And print coverage of events overseas has declined by 80 percent.
What little coverage remains tends to be grossly scattershot and superficial, often written by people who aren't even on the scene: They're in D.C. or New York, getting their news from the wire services.
The result--as everyone who lives in any country that's not the US knows--is ridiculous. Sometimes grotesquely so, as France, for example, will attest: nytimes.com/2020/11/15/bus…
(Macron was right.)
The people writing about Paris or Mumbai from their desks in New York often seem to be writing about some imaginary country where everyone shares the woke preoccupations of the New York journalist class.
Or they write in condescending caricatures and clichés.
What's more, most people now receive their news from social media, which algorithmically sorts celebrity gossip to the top. There's news to be found out there, but casual consumers get as little information about the rest of the world as Soviet citizens during the Cold War.
For many years, I despaired of this, as all journalists do.

Then one day, as I was despairing of it on Twitter with my old friend @VivekYKelkar (with whom I worked a quarter-century ago at the original Asia Times), I said, impulsively,
"Who wants to join me in fixing this problem? Shall we start a new publication?"

Better to light a candle than curse the darkness, right?

To my surprise, friends around the world, said, "I'm in."
Usually, something like this would end there--we'd all vow to do something then forget about it because our lives are busy and it takes a huge amount of effort to start a new publication. But this time was different.
The pandemic had made us prisoners. We had nowhere else to go.
So we did it. We started a new publication. Here it is: cosmopolitanglobalist.com
FAQ:
Q: Why did you call it the Cosmopolitan Globalist?
A: All the other domain names were taken already.
Q: How is it different from other publications?
A: It's better.
Q: How do I sign up?
A: Right here: claireberlinski.substack.com. You'll receive our free newsletter, too.
Q. Around the world, liberal democracy is in retreat. The West is divided, and Caesarism is flourishing. Why?
A. We wonder, too. If you want to know, you should subscribe.
Q. A free newsletter? How do you make money?
A. From paying subscribers, which we hope you'll become.
Q. What do I get if I pay?
A. You get access to our discussion forums, debates, and podcasts, plus our premium newsletter, Global Eyes, a news survey that tells you what's happening in every corner of the globe.
Plus, you get our Magic Goggles™ Translation Superhighway. You can read about this here: claireberlinski.substack.com/p/global-eyes-….
And that's not all!
You also get the chart or the map of the day.
And you get the Stern Scolding of the Day from Hu, Supervillain CCP Mouthpiece. (Many readers tell us that having their thoughts rectified by Hu is the best part of their tapped-out, decadent, imperialist running-dog mornings.)
Plus, you get to support a worthwhile venture.
And if you subscribe now, you get to lock in your subscription at a very reasonable, low price.
So come have a look at what we're doing, here: cosmopolitanglobalist.com
And sign up for our newsletter: claireberlinski.substack.com/about?utm_sour…
We'd love to have you join us, and if you follow me on Twitter, that means you'd probably like @cosmo_globalist very much.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Claire Berlinski.

Claire Berlinski. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClaireBerlinski

16 Jan
So @ArunInParis wanted an agenda for the Twitter Space; here's the one I suggest, feel free to amend.
1. Polls. Who's up this week? Who's down? Whose poll do we trust and why?
2. The pandemic: How significant do we think this issue will prove? How are the candidates positioning themselves as pandemic-wranglers? Macron's "emmerder" gambit.
3. Parrainage: Will any candidate fail to get the signatures?

4. The primaire populaire de la gauche: Does this matter at all? Is there any chance of a left candidate emerging through any conceivable path?
Read 7 tweets
16 Jan
Reminder: We've been meeting weekly (except during the holidays) to discuss the French presidential race. (In English.) Who's up? Who's down? If you're interested in French politics, join us today at 3:00 pm French time. #FrenchElectionTwitterSpace
Any suggested reading prior to the Twitter Space, @ArunLeParisien @jclavel2003 @fredericg? (In French or English.) I'll post a few things that caught my eye on this thread.
Read 11 tweets
10 Jan
Podcasters:
I have switched off your interesting-sounding podcasts after five minutes, over and over again, because you're so inarticulate.
If you have a podcast, please follow these simple rules:
1. Stop saying "like" and "you know."
2. Stop saying "um" and "uh."
3. Stop stammering.
4. Stop saying, "kind of," "sort of," "so," and, "I mean."
6. Don't say, "It feels like" prefatory to a declarative sentence.
7. Don't say, "and whatnot" at the end of a sentence.
8. Speak coherently: Subject, verb, object. Not "And I was like, you know," "So I go, um, you know"
Just stop that. It's maddening.
Read 11 tweets
6 Jan
If you know anyone who was swayed by Malone's obscenely mendacious appearance on @joerogan @joeroganhq, and if he or she isn't willing to look at the data in written form, you can show him or her this video.

But I'm deeply frustrated.
During this pandemic, a significant stream of anti-vax bullshit--and it is absolute, murderous horseshit--has come from Malone, @BretWeinstein, Steve Kirsh, Pierre Kory, and half a dozen other figures whom we see making these claims over and over again.
Every time, someone (many people) write articles and make videos in response, patiently explaining that the things they're saying aren't true, and are in fact very dangerously wrong.

But they don't stop.

They're not good faith actors. They're not merely mistaken.
Read 13 tweets
6 Jan
It's very common to say, "Trump is the symptom, not the cause," and I think I've even said it myself a few times, but I wonder if that's true. I wonder if that's something we tell ourselves because just as it's unbearable to think a nincompoop like Princip could have started WW1,
it's unbearable to think a buffoon like Trump could have caused so much damage to a great superpower.
But I think it may well be possible that Trump was a cause. Had he not run for president, one of the other candidates would have won the GOP primary,
and while they've all *in retrospect* shown themselves willing to follow Trump right off a cliff, not one of them--at the time--seemed vastly aberrant or committed to undermining critical American traditions. Without Trump, very little of what's ensued would have happened.
Read 9 tweets
6 Jan
I think it's entirely plausible that the vast majority of America is as cheerful, hardworking, optimistic, and basically decent as it's always been. But there *is* a civil war on Twitter (i.e., among our elites) and in our useless government.
Historically, that's been enough to cause civil wars. Think about, say, the English civil war. And we also have an unusually violent and well-armed society. I would submit that instead of dismissing this as bullshit, we should consider it a warning:
That a spate of such articles have been published of late means that there's an appetite for reading them. No one wants to read about something that basically sounds preposterous to them. These wouldn't have been published in, say, 1989.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(