Asha Rangappa Profile picture
Jan 15, 2022 11 tweets 4 min read Read on X
THREAD. Since there’s so much [waves hands everywhere] crazy coming up all of a sudden, let me break down the theory of how the overturning of the election was supposed to go down:
STEP 1: John Eastman concocts a “legal blueprint” whereby VP Pence elides the requirements of the Electoral Vote Act based on 7 states submitting dual slates of electors, allowing Pence to either count the alternate slate or not count those states at all cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2021/image…
STEP 2: GOP operatives/officials in those 7 states in fact create a false slate of electors and submit them as official, so they can be used in the scenario above cnn.com/2022/01/12/pol…
STEP 3: DOJ, meanwhile, submits letters to each state, indicating (falsely) that they have reason to believe that there has been election fraud. This creates perception that results are actually in question, bolstering VP’s ability to discount their votes documentcloud.org/documents/2108…
***I should note here that, as with the quid-pro-quo with Ukraine, it wouldn’t have mattered if these states did not actually investigate voter fraud — the DOJ letters would have been enough to create *the appearance* that the outcome in these states was still in the air
STEP 4: The Big Lie is repeated in rallies and social media, saturating information space to rile up base and give momentum to “Stop the Steal” movement justsecurity.org/74622/stopthes…
STEP 5: Plan for all of these angry and agitated individuals to come to D.C. on January 6, the day that Eastman’s plan will be put into effect. The protesters are sent to march on the Capitol, to further put pressure on VP Pence and lawmakers, as stated in Oath Keeper indictment Image
STEP 6: Since mob attack is intended to keep up pressure on Pence/lawmakers, they must be able to remain in Capitol as long as possible. So: 6a) Purge top DOD and replace with loyalists; and 6b) delay LE/National Guard response as long as possible esquire.com/news-politics/…
STEP 7: ??? I’m not sure what was supposed to happen at this point. Presumably, Pence would somehow declare Trump the winner, or if not, the Capitol would remain occupied until they found a way to make him do it. Seems like they planned to continue the siege ImageImage
The point is that there are a lot of moving parts and evidence surfacing in a lot of different areas but they are all connected to one overarching goal: Keep Trump in power by subverting the counting of the electoral votes and preventing the transfer of power to Biden /END
POST SCRIPT: Every step I have described above, with additional detail, is spelled out in the below article (written by Sidney Blumenthal). Stop and read it from the beginning to the end. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Asha Rangappa

Asha Rangappa Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AshaRangappa_

Aug 31
Thread. To understand Trump’s psyche and how he manipulates his followers (and the media), let me introduce you to the Karpman Drama Triangle. Google it. Then keep reading. 1/
Image
The Karpman Drama Triangle (hereinafter KDT) was created by psychologies Stephen Karpman in 1968. It posits that all conflicts are an enactment of the triangle, with each player assuming a role in the triangle, and then circling around the triangle and switching roles, depending on how the conflict evolves 2/
I became fascinated with the KPD over a decade ago. It’s been used to understand dynamics in everything from codependency to geopolitics. (It’s worth looking at: Chances are you are on the triangle in some area of your life and can give you a lot of perspective) 3/
Read 7 tweets
Jul 1
So basically a President could order Seal Team Six to assassinate his political opponent and it is OK (Court says you can't examine motive when a President is acting under an explicit Constitutional authority, which would include the Commander in Chief clause)
The idea that the motive in taking even an official act cannot be questioned makes the word "faithful" in the Take Care clause ("he shall Take Care that the laws be faithfully executed") meaningless. Generally the Constitution is not read to render any of its words or phrases irrelevant
Even more extraordinary, the Court says you cannot use an official act as evidence (as opposed to charging the act itself as a crime)...makes it unclear how you would prosecute presidential bribery or treason -- both crimes MENTIONED IN THE CONSTITUTION
Read 4 tweets
Apr 10
I don’t really expect average people to know or understand the differences between Title I and Section 702 of FISA…but I would think (hope?) a *former president* would? Section 702 literally had nothing to do with surveillance of his campaign. So incompetent. Image
Also: You cannot claim to be strong against China — or Iran, or Russia, or any other foreign adversary or terrorist group for that matter — and be in favor of “killing” FISA (Title I or Section 702). This post basically says he wants all of these to have free reign against us Image
If you want a deep dive explainer on Section 702 and why the query “warrant” doesn’t make sense and would basically neutralize the FBI’s use of 702 entirely (making it harder to stop spies, terrorists, and cyberattacks), I wrote this in 2017* justsecurity.org/47428/dont-fal…
Read 5 tweets
Jan 9
Interesting that for purpose of presidential immunity, Trump argues that running as a candidate and holding office are one and the same. But when it comes to application Sec. 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, Trump wants to split hairs on "running" and "holding" office. No principle
According to Trump's lawyers, the President of the United States could order Seal Team Six to murder his political opponent and he would be immune from prosecution unless he was immediately impeached, convicted, and removed from office first 2/
Apart from this bizarre interpretation (which would obviously let the president off the hook for anything he did in his last days of office), this contradicts Trumps position in impeachment 2.0 that he should not be convicted bc criminal prosecution is the appropriate remedy 3/
Read 11 tweets
Jun 29, 2023
THREAD. Admissions officer here 🙋🏾‍♀️ IMO Harvard/UNC opinion is much narrower than I expected it to be and impact will be much less than I see a lot of people suggesting -- and possibly give institutions MORE ability to curate classes based on diversity interests 1/
2. The implicit question here and the one the justices disagree on is this: Can race be a proxy for experience? Harvard/UNC/dissent says yes, majority says no, these can be bifurcated: race can't be a proxy, but an individual story of how race has shaped person CAN be considered
3. There are implications here: It means that applicants whose identity is shaped by race will need to articulate that explicitly in order for it to be taken into account. This is an added burden on the applicant. But, most apps include a supplemental diversity essay already
Read 8 tweets
Jun 8, 2023
Today's SCOTUS opinion in the AL redistricting case illustrates consequences of what @steve_vladeck calls the "shadow docket." Ct upheld lower court, which itself applied clear precedent...but it STAYED the lower court pending decision, allowing illegal map to be used in 2022! 1/
The Court says that lower court "faithfully applied our precedents" and that the state's challenge was trying to "remake Sec. 2 jurisprudence anew"...and yet did not allow the lower court's "faithful" application (upheld by appeals ct with 2 Trump appointees) to take effect 2/
Highly recommend @steve_vladeck's book as it explains how these procedural machinations (which also happened in TX abortion litigation) effectively allows for substantive changes in the law without accountability. Good outcome moving forward, but this is also part of "story" END
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(