So Mr Johnson wants to stay on as PM even if he’s kicked out as Party leader.

Typical of the desperate solipsist.

But he has a point.

The Party can go hang, if he can command a majority in the House of Commons.

How would he achieve that?

A 🧵/1.
Given how distrusted & disliked he is: with a high degree of certainty, no way.

But imagine, just imagine, he had the integrity & insight to understand he’s been wrecking the country by pandering to an extremist minority (a majority of his MPs).

And that he has to stop it. /2.
If he ditched the extremists, & took around one third of his MPs with him to strike a deal with the opposition parties, he could be instrumental in creating a new government, right now, to save the country.

It’s pretty much impossible to see how he could remain PM. /3.
But he could dramatically turn the tables on his disastrous term in office so far, creating a worthy legacy.

OK, hilarious.

He isn’t remotely capable of any of that, emotionally or intellectually.

But the thought process is a good one. /4.
Among the remaining fraction of the Conservative Parliamentary Party still committed to constitutional government, fundamental rights & the security, prosperity & well-being of the country, there are some who could take a leadership role. /5.
And lead their like-minded colleagues to do the right thing.

Mr Johnson will, forever, have been a disaster.

There’s no good reason why the constitutionally sound MPs left in the Party should allow themselves to be dragged down further.

Still less allow the country to be. /6.
The Queen will invite the person able to command a majority in the House to form a government.

Mr Johnson’s right about one thing: there’s no need whatsoever for that to be the Conservative Party Leader. /7. End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Levi

Andrew Levi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AndrewPRLevi

Jan 15,
I’ve written elsewhere about @SueGrayCO’s inquiry.

@LordRickettsP (do follow, if you don’t already) is, of course, absolutely right about the usual nature of such things.

The difference this time is Sue Gray has a unique position in a unique scandal.

A🧵/1.
One which can bring down a uniquely dangerous PM. We’ve never seen anything remotely like it since 1940. Then it was dealt with by Parliament (with much action behind the scenes).

Sue Gray has a choice.

Why?

Because she’s in a position, like it or not, to eject the PM. /2.
Or fail to do so (& live with the knowledge that she didn’t when she had the chance).

Nothing is certain.

It’s a penalty shot which could be missed. The chances of that aren’t high.

The probability of failure to convert her opportunity if the shot isn’t taken is 100%. /3.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 14,
If you were truly sorry, @katejosephs, you’d have said this two years ago. And you’d resign. Now.

Your Twitter profile says you’re a “proud public servant”.

The pride many thousands of us have felt, at all levels of seniority, serving our country, is sullied by your misconduct.
For anyone thinking this is all a storm in a teacup, or a minor transgression, you’re entitled to your opinion. I strongly disagree with you. Here’s a brief, extra bit of context👇
Read 4 tweets
Jan 13,
The level of desperation emanating from Downing Street today is off any normal charts.

First MI5 (see short 🧵, attached 👇).

Now HM The Queen.

I’m talking about Prince - no longer HRH - Andrew, of course.

Let’s clear this up, shall we?

Another🧵 /1.
Under the UK’s peculiar constitutional arrangements, The Queen is required (or assumed by convention to be required) to heed, & act on, the advice of her PM.

She is considered, under the same conventions, to have the right to be consulted, to encourage & to warn./2.
In the case of Prince Andrew giving up his military ranks & roles, his patronages & use of “HRH”, that means:

(a) The Queen is required to agree to those steps if the PM advises them

(b) the same goes for the timing

(c) she can’t take them without the PM’s agreement

/3.
Read 11 tweets
Jan 13,
The Home Secretary, reporting to the PM, is responsible for MI5.

There are no circumstances, without their permission, in which MI5 would pass to the Speaker a high profile warning about foreign agents active in Parliament.

Nor would MI5, if instructed by them, refuse to./1.
More specifically, if MI5 advised it shouldn’t be done, the Home Secretary/ PM could direct them nonetheless to do so. And MI5 would have to.

If MI5 thought it illegal, they would have to refuse. But that looks irrelevant in the current Chinese agent case. /2.
MI5 “self-actuates”, within its mandate, on much of its work.

Any security expert would tell you it has to be that way, for very good practical reasons.

But not on political matters. Least of all on high profile public announcements. /3.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 13,
You have to feel for Sue Gray. She wants to retain her integrity & conscience. There’s only one way. Force out the Prime Minister.

And to do that, she has to be ready ruthlessly to confront him with the fact she’ll resign in a manner devastating to him if he doesn’t go first./1.
She has enough of the receipts already.

By confronting him with the fact they’re with a trusted third party ready for publication if he doesn’t do what she requires, on the spot, he’s cornered.

“Sign this ready-drafted resignation letter, Prime Minister”. /2.
He can try to have her fired, or to ignore her & brazen it out.

If he does, she’ll have her own ready-made resignation issued instantly, alongside the publication of detailed, damning evidence, including multiple breaches of the Ministerial Code. And worse. /3.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 12,
Bring your own brain, part 4.

The PM’s parties.

Good grief!

In case you’d like better to understand the Downing Street & Cabinet Office layout, this short 🧵 will, I hope, help. All from the public record, BTW.

First, Google Maps satellite image of the No 10 site. /1.
The red-roofed, L-shaped, mini mansion at the back is part of “No 10”. You can’t see it, or imagine it, from the front door view in Downing Street. The ground floor plan👇is a historic document. Some details of usage, or even non load-bearing walls, may have changed slightly. /2.
Here is the corresponding first floor plan 👇/3.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(