1. Nani was offered the Chief judgeship of the Apex Court in the 1960s, which he declined. If he had accepted the proposal, he would have become the longest serving CJI till date between 1971 to1985.
2. On one of his answer papers during his LLB, the examiner wrote, “Frankly, this candidate knows much more than I do.” He was a meteor at the Bar and soon left his seniors way behind
3. But who knew that on November 22, 1951, someone from 1,000 km southwards would sue Palkhivala for piracy and copyright infringement. It was AC Sampath Iyengar, an advocate from Madras High Court.
4. His famous budget-day speeches started out as an informal gathering where he would dissect the Union Budget for the audience. Its popularity grew to such an extent that hiring of the Brabourne stadium in Mumbai.
What Palkhivala argued that day was something like the basic structure doctrine that was laid down—there are implied limitations to the Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
The Court said that the testimony of the complainant was inconsistent and riddled with variations and the allegations were an outcome of factional feud within the church and complainant's desire for power and position.
A thread on what happened in the Marital Rape case hearing today
Amicus Curiae, Senior Advocate Rajshekhar Rao asked the Delhi High Court if it is reasonable, just and fair in today’s day and age to deny the wife a right to call rape a rape.
A Bench of Justices Rajiv Shakdher and C Hari Shankar has been hearing these petitions.
Interestingly, Rao during the hearing today played a video of the Thames Valley Police where making a cup of tea is compared to the concept of consent.
Rao submitted that "by denying the opportunity for a woman to prosecute a man, even her husband, for rape has the practical effect of obliterating her consent altogether.”