Long-term bullish on $LUNA, but indecisive of its short-term direction?
OPTIONS would be an excellent addition to generating income while the market moves sideways.
A Threadπ§΅
1/ The two platforms currently supporting Options for $LUNA are @friktion_labs and @Katana_HQ, both on Solana.
Friktion offers two options strategies for $LUNAβCovered Calls and Cash secured puts, while Katana only offers Covered Calls for LUNA
2/ WTF are covered calls and cash-secured puts?
Let's see π
3/ First of all, you don't need to know the nitty-gritty of options here. Both are structured into a simple vault where the only thing you need to do is deposit $LUNA.
Let's look at an example of Covered Calls β¬
4/ Suppose you deposit 1 LUNA into the LUNA Covered Call Vault on Katana.
There will be a 'Strike Price'
In this case, the strike price is $92 and the current price of Luna is $86
5/ Each vault will also have an expiry date. Presently, each vault will expire weekly(on Friday, 8am UTC)
Suppose LUNA price reaches $100 before or at Expiry.
In that case, the Options will get exercised/executed
6/ What does that mean?
It means that your LUNA is sold at a 'strike price' of $92
So, we lost (100 -92) = $8.
The $92 is converted to LUNA.
92 /100 = 0.92 LUNA
7/ In dollar terms, we had $86 (the price of 1 LUNA in the beginning)
Now we have a $92 plus Yield.
What Yield? π
8/ For LUNA to be sold at $92, the buyer had to pay a 'premium' for the right to exercise(buy) it. That premium is the Yield we obtain, represented as 'projected APY' in the vault.
9/ The APY is derived from a time-weighted average of all previous rounds, and since it's only been around for a few weeks, the APYs can be extrapolated.
So as more epochs come along, the APY's will be updated to give a more reflective view of performance.
10/ Note: Yields are driven entirely based on market conditions and volatility - and not from token emissions seen in yield farming
So in dollar terms, we gained 92-86= $6 plus Yield. The Yield will be in the deposited asset, which is LUNA in this case.
11/ In Luna terms we lost 1-0.92= 0.08 LUNA.
The loss is unlimited because we don't have exposure to LUNA once it's sold off at $92. But since it's weekly, the chances of LUNA mooning hard are low.
12/ If $LUNA price doesnβt reach $100 before or at Expiry, the option expires worthless and you keep the yield!
Now let's look at an example of cash-secured puts for LUNA in Friktionππ
13/ Instead of depositing LUNA, we deposit $UST, say $100.
There will be a 'Strike Price.'
Let's say the strike price is $70 and the current price of Luna is $86
14/ Each vault will have a weekly expiry date, as mentioned before.
Suppose LUNA price reaches $70 at Expiry, the Options will get exercised.
What does that mean? π
15/ It means we purchased LUNA for the strike price of $70.
Now we have 100/ 70 = 1.42 LUNA.
But wait, we also get Yield for providing that option to the seller. Suppose the Yield is 10%(just for calculation) of the deposited amount, i.e., $10.
16/ So now we have $80 worth of LUNA = 1.42 + 0.14 = 1.56 LUNA.
Thus, the premium you receive allows you to lower your overall purchase price if you get assigned the shares.
17/ In both cases, the Yield is auto-compounded and used for the next round of weekly options unless withdrawn.
Both use the @PsyOptions protocol to mint/create an option in the backend. These options are sold through auction in the OTC market.
18/ Friktion uses European style options, so the options can only be exercised on Expiry.
Katana uses American-style options, so the options can be exercised at any time before or at Expiry.
There's a 10% performance fee and a 0.1% withdrawal fee on Friction
Katana has 0 fee's
19/ You can use @wormholecrypto to bridge LUNA/UST from Terra to Solana.
Heard concerns about how Anchor will sustain ~20% yield during a bear market and whether yield reserve will deplete. A quick π§΅
$ANC $LUNA
ππ
1/ First of all, the promise of Anchor is in the stabilized stable yield, not in the 20% itself.
The aim is to become the benchmark rate of Defi, and it doesn't necessarily have to be 20%.
2/ The long-term anchor rates can be algorithmically adjusted (currently static, set by gov), reflecting current market/protocol conditions, updating every long term period, like 6 months
Many dont know the difference between APR and APY, especially when it comes to defi. A simple 𧡠ππ
APR (annual percentage return) is the annual rate of return *not* taking into account effects of the compound of interest
APY(annual percentage yield) is the annual rate of return, taking into account the effects of the compound of interest.
APY>APR
It's better to calculate your returns on investment using APY, while APR is more common in lending
Eg, a yield farming program offers APR of 100%/yr. You deposit $1000. A year later you'll receive $2000, where $1000 is the initial capital and $1000 is APR
A thread 𧡠on @mars_protocol π΄ and why it could be the biggest interstellar value unlocker for the wider crypto landscape and a π for Terra
$mars $luna
Mars is a broader and more comprehensive companion to @anchor_protocol. While Anchor is limited to pos assets(yield generating) to ensure the sole focus of a fixed ~20% yield on deposits, Mars is more extensive in its offerings.
If you don't know how anchor works, I suggest this excellent thread by @FloodCapital