This is not an experiment I’m super excited to do on my own hardware (plus I don’t have a Chinese payment method.) Has anyone tried changing their Apple account to “mainland China” on the iCloud website to see what happens to data flows on their devices?
My question is: what warnings do you get on-device before it starts uploading your data to Guizhou? I hope someone is/has moved to China recently and is willing to try this for me.
What can I offer people to do this experiment for me? Happy to offer all the RTs in the world and I’ll even scrape up a tiny bounty if someone is willing.
To be clear here’s what I would like to see:
1. Set up a US/EU iCloud account that has not previously been registered in China, connect a device to it w/ iCloud Backup + Keychain. 2. Using iCloud.com (not the device!) change registration to “China (mainland)”. 1/
3. See what warnings appear on the device itself, if any, once it detects the registration change. 4. Optional (but would be awesome) monitor the network to see when device switches from US/EU iCloud datacenters to GCBD.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Although Facebook is the primary target of this pressure campaign, it’s hard not to notice how closely Apple’s client-side scanning announcement fits with the UK government’s desires.
Don’t listen to anyone who tells you “they’ll never give in to government pressure” when it’s obvious they already are.
Major surprise to me in reviewing this code is how immature the JS/Node/browser crypto ecosystem is in 2022. I wanted to say “just use <standard library>” but: what should that library be?
So instead of having proper well-maintained crypto libraries for securing all these assets, we have libraries from individual contributors. This is where OpenSSL was in 2000.
I decided to look at MetaMask’s crypto, and oh wow I wish I could unlook.
To be clear I didn’t even make it to a lot of the core routines yet. Just hunting through piles of poorly-commented JS and *hoping* the particular GitHub repo I’m looking at is actually the right one.
Reached a point where I was in someone’s personal GitHub repo and I was like “I think this is the right code” but honestly I dunno.
I am of the opinion that NFTs are going to be important. But I am also sympathetic to the take below. Don’t mistake *believing in the significance* of a technology for accepting and supporting all of its downsides.
One of the dumbest lessons I’ve learned in my career is that you should never disregard something that has hype behind it, even if you don’t think the tech makes sense.
Most “tech adoption” problems are really human coordination problems. Hype solves those. It doesn’t matter if you have a better solution, or that you think the proposed solution is stupid.
Facebook (ugh must we call them Meta) is deploying an image scanning system to detect revenge porn. The novelty is that the people reporting the images never have to show the originals to Facebook. about.fb.com/news/2021/12/s…
I’m sure this has been carefully thought out. I hope it has. Because as described in the post it seems fairly ripe for abuse.
In any case, it’s worth flagging this just in case you thought this image scanning tech would stop with child sexual abuse media. There is a whole library of content that people want to censor and surveil: often for perfectly benign reasons.
I’ve belatedly come to believe that we blew it by focusing on secure messaging, while Silicon Valley quietly built their unencrypted backup infrastructure and doomed most of our efforts.
I think people at Apple knew this back in ~2014, which is why they threw so much effort into an (ultimately doomed) effort to deploy end-to-end encrypted iCloud backup. But they were too late.
By the time they got close to deploying it, governments had realized the value of what Apple (and Google) had built. There was no way they were going to let that resource be taken from them.