Lina Khan is talking about reviewing merger policy for the FTC and asking for public comments. Such public comments will be, in her words, "critical."
Khan saying that the current merger wave "threatens to concentrate markets further." See our report on the merger frenzy. economicliberties.us/our-work/merge…
Khan says that while the merger wave has "delivered benefits for investment banks," it has not delivered benefits for ordinary Americans.
Antitrust mic drop
(1) Asks how data factors into mergers, about private equity roll-ups, and monopolization in its incipiency. (2) Asks about mergers and labor effects, layoffs and elimination of capacity. (3) Asks about *direct* evidence in merger analysis, not just market share and pricing.
Khan explicitly asks for people outside the antitrust community to weigh in with their thoughts on mergers. Workers, farmers, consumers, investors, etc.
New Antitrust Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter starts out with praise with Khan and the FTC. "Too many industries have become concentrated, and we need to understand why."
Kanter says the 'supply chain no longer follows a simple upstream and downstream path.' Sounds like there will be changes to the very concept of horizontal/vertical mergers that underpins current policy.
Kanter echoes Khan in asking to hear from a 'diverse set of stakeholders' on merger guidelines. Asks specifically for farmers and entrepreneurs to weigh in.
"Here's a message to the American people. Please share your views."
Kanter implies that firms that already have market power should have heightened standards.
Also says horizontal/vertical distinction doesn't always makes sense.
Finally notes DOJ shares the concerns of FTC on vertical mergers. FTC withdrew its vertical guidelines, DOJ hasn't.
Kanter talks about market definition as being too narrow, notes that we should think about competition in terms of stacks of products, aka ecosystems. This is fascinating.
A very strong emphasis from both Khan and Kanter on the experience of ordinary people in the real-world. Seems like they want to move away from abstract economic theory.
Antitrust establishment seems pretty annoyed. I wonder why. The existing merger policy has been great. nytimes.com/2018/04/01/art…
Why are they trying to change merger guidelines? Everything seems to be going great.
Everything is great. I don't get all of this 'there are too many mergers.'
It's super weird that anyone would want to change merger standards. Low prices are great. linde.com/news-media/pre…
Some initial thoughts. The Microsoft-Activision acquisition is clear evidence of consolidation in gaming. It's not just that Microsoft already owns 30 studios, it's that Activision itself is a roll-up of 25+ gaming studios. A merger of mergers.
There are reasons to think Microsoft will run Activision better than its existing leadership, which is terrible. But the clear goal here is to build out its streaming service Game Pass, and more broadly to achieve market power in the ecosystem of gaming.
This paper is incredibly dishonest. The main program was the Fed's bailout of the stock market, but somehow @davidautor de facto deny that the Federal Reserve bailout even existed. Just utterly shameful.
What a shocker that a bunch of Federal Reserve economists don't evaluate the Federal Reserve's massive bailout of billionaires.
The Paycheck Protection Program was quite successful at saving small businesses, and small businesses make a lot of products and services we need, and anchor communities. For some reason economists don't see any value in production or community.
1. I know everything is supposed to be totally awful in politics, but allow me to interrupt constant doom and gloom with... good news. On the monopoly front, corporate power is, ever so slightly, ebbing. Here are eight examples from the last week. mattstoller.substack.com/p/hope-on-the-…
2. Government antitrust cases are progressing. The Federal Trade Commission won an important procedural victory against Facebook this week. marketplace.org/shows/marketpl…
3. Meanwhile, state attorneys general, whose antitrust case was dismissed last year, appealed the dismissal. Normally they would have given up, but increasing heat on Facebook gave confidence to state level enforcers.
I was freaking out about COVID in Jan/Feb of 2020, before most people noticed. Back then Vox was saying it was the flu and Fauci was telling young people to go on cruise ships. Don’t act like the risk calculus of the public health bureaucracy is well-tuned to reality.
Back then among the left’s biggest concerns was whether people were patronizing Chinese restaurants. Our whole intellectual model for governance is embarrassing.
I wrote in Wired in late Feb of 2020 we would be experiencing shortages. Our risk calculus and governance models do not map to reality. wired.com/story/covid-19…
So a different way to characterize what Google was doing to publishers is 'stealing.' Sorry to get all technical about it. wsj.com/articles/googl…
"Google pocketed the difference between what it told publishers and advertisers that an ad cost and used the pool of money to manipulate future auctions to expand its digital monopoly.”
"The documents cite internal correspondence in which Google employees said some of these practices amounted to growing its business through “insider information."
Biden is flailing because the political emergency of the pandemic is over but the professional managerial class won't let him govern according to what voters actually want.
Hospitals and health care systems are under pressure because we let financiers strip mine them for parts. Little to do with Covid. Biden could fix this but he'd have to acknowledge it.
The stress on hospitals is coming from Wall Street.